Cargando…

Challenges for Use of PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit for Analysis of Poultry Meat

The rapid SafTest PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit (PeroxySafe method) was approved by the AOAC to determine peroxide values (PVs) in foods. Studies were conducted to remedy challenges (reaction time, lack of turbidity in samples, effect of prooxidant [NaCl]) for use of the method when analyzing PVs in turkey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Annie J., Suen, Lok T. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12960
_version_ 1782455331740188672
author King, Annie J.
Suen, Lok T. M.
author_facet King, Annie J.
Suen, Lok T. M.
author_sort King, Annie J.
collection PubMed
description The rapid SafTest PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit (PeroxySafe method) was approved by the AOAC to determine peroxide values (PVs) in foods. Studies were conducted to remedy challenges (reaction time, lack of turbidity in samples, effect of prooxidant [NaCl]) for use of the method when analyzing PVs in turkey meat. Initially, PVs could not be consistently obtained after a reaction time of 10 min (per directions) for variously processed meat. However, trends indicated that heated and heated/stored samples generally had higher numerical values than Fresh ones. This trend agreed with that of other investigators, suggesting usefulness of the method if consistent data could be obtained. Data for PVs of all treatments within processing conditions were recorded at 10, 20, and 30 min. There was a highly significant (P ≤ 0.0001) effect for reaction time with 30 min > 20 min > 10 min. An increase in PVs was noted for heated samples when lipids and oxidation products were released by homogenization, rather than vortexing with glass beads, and data were recorded at the 30 min. It is likely that these precautions may promote more accurate determination of PVs from samples with NaCl, a prooxidant. Comparison of extraction procedures for the PeroxySafe method and that of Grau and others (2000) showed that the extraction procedure (homogenization) of the latter method produced numerically greater PVs for fresh/stored samples than that of the former. However, it was concluded that the PeroxySafe method could be used for comparative analyses of samples when adequate extraction (turbidity) occurred and measurements were recorded after a 20 to 30 min reaction time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50348072016-10-03 Challenges for Use of PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit for Analysis of Poultry Meat King, Annie J. Suen, Lok T. M. J Food Sci C: Food Chemistry The rapid SafTest PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit (PeroxySafe method) was approved by the AOAC to determine peroxide values (PVs) in foods. Studies were conducted to remedy challenges (reaction time, lack of turbidity in samples, effect of prooxidant [NaCl]) for use of the method when analyzing PVs in turkey meat. Initially, PVs could not be consistently obtained after a reaction time of 10 min (per directions) for variously processed meat. However, trends indicated that heated and heated/stored samples generally had higher numerical values than Fresh ones. This trend agreed with that of other investigators, suggesting usefulness of the method if consistent data could be obtained. Data for PVs of all treatments within processing conditions were recorded at 10, 20, and 30 min. There was a highly significant (P ≤ 0.0001) effect for reaction time with 30 min > 20 min > 10 min. An increase in PVs was noted for heated samples when lipids and oxidation products were released by homogenization, rather than vortexing with glass beads, and data were recorded at the 30 min. It is likely that these precautions may promote more accurate determination of PVs from samples with NaCl, a prooxidant. Comparison of extraction procedures for the PeroxySafe method and that of Grau and others (2000) showed that the extraction procedure (homogenization) of the latter method produced numerically greater PVs for fresh/stored samples than that of the former. However, it was concluded that the PeroxySafe method could be used for comparative analyses of samples when adequate extraction (turbidity) occurred and measurements were recorded after a 20 to 30 min reaction time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-14 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5034807/ /pubmed/26172608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12960 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Food Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Institute of Food Technologists This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle C: Food Chemistry
King, Annie J.
Suen, Lok T. M.
Challenges for Use of PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit for Analysis of Poultry Meat
title Challenges for Use of PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit for Analysis of Poultry Meat
title_full Challenges for Use of PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit for Analysis of Poultry Meat
title_fullStr Challenges for Use of PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit for Analysis of Poultry Meat
title_full_unstemmed Challenges for Use of PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit for Analysis of Poultry Meat
title_short Challenges for Use of PeroxySafe(™) MSA Kit for Analysis of Poultry Meat
title_sort challenges for use of peroxysafe(™) msa kit for analysis of poultry meat
topic C: Food Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12960
work_keys_str_mv AT kinganniej challengesforuseofperoxysafemsakitforanalysisofpoultrymeat
AT suenloktm challengesforuseofperoxysafemsakitforanalysisofpoultrymeat