Cargando…
Computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning
There are two prevailing notions regarding the involvement of the corticobasal ganglia system in value‐based learning: (i) the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia are crucial for appetitive and aversive learning, respectively, and (ii) the activity of midbrain dopamine neurons represen...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26095906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12994 |
_version_ | 1782455339523768320 |
---|---|
author | Morita, Kenji Kawaguchi, Yasuo |
author_facet | Morita, Kenji Kawaguchi, Yasuo |
author_sort | Morita, Kenji |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are two prevailing notions regarding the involvement of the corticobasal ganglia system in value‐based learning: (i) the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia are crucial for appetitive and aversive learning, respectively, and (ii) the activity of midbrain dopamine neurons represents reward‐prediction error. Although (ii) constitutes a critical assumption of (i), it remains elusive how (ii) holds given (i), with the basal‐ganglia influence on the dopamine neurons. Here we present a computational neural‐circuit model that potentially resolves this issue. Based on the latest analyses of the heterogeneous corticostriatal neurons and connections, our model posits that the direct and indirect pathways, respectively, represent the values of upcoming and previous actions, and up‐regulate and down‐regulate the dopamine neurons via the basal‐ganglia output nuclei. This explains how the difference between the upcoming and previous values, which constitutes the core of reward‐prediction error, is calculated. Simultaneously, it predicts that blockade of the direct/indirect pathway causes a negative/positive shift of reward‐prediction error and thereby impairs learning from positive/negative error, i.e. appetitive/aversive learning. Through simulation of reward‐reversal learning and punishment‐avoidance learning, we show that our model could indeed account for the experimentally observed features that are suggested to support notion (i) and could also provide predictions on neural activity. We also present a behavioral prediction of our model, through simulation of inter‐temporal choice, on how the balance between the two pathways relates to the subject's time preference. These results indicate that our model, incorporating the heterogeneity of the cortical influence on the basal ganglia, is expected to provide a closed‐circuit mechanistic understanding of appetitive/aversive learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5034842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50348422016-10-03 Computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning Morita, Kenji Kawaguchi, Yasuo Eur J Neurosci Computational Neuroscience There are two prevailing notions regarding the involvement of the corticobasal ganglia system in value‐based learning: (i) the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia are crucial for appetitive and aversive learning, respectively, and (ii) the activity of midbrain dopamine neurons represents reward‐prediction error. Although (ii) constitutes a critical assumption of (i), it remains elusive how (ii) holds given (i), with the basal‐ganglia influence on the dopamine neurons. Here we present a computational neural‐circuit model that potentially resolves this issue. Based on the latest analyses of the heterogeneous corticostriatal neurons and connections, our model posits that the direct and indirect pathways, respectively, represent the values of upcoming and previous actions, and up‐regulate and down‐regulate the dopamine neurons via the basal‐ganglia output nuclei. This explains how the difference between the upcoming and previous values, which constitutes the core of reward‐prediction error, is calculated. Simultaneously, it predicts that blockade of the direct/indirect pathway causes a negative/positive shift of reward‐prediction error and thereby impairs learning from positive/negative error, i.e. appetitive/aversive learning. Through simulation of reward‐reversal learning and punishment‐avoidance learning, we show that our model could indeed account for the experimentally observed features that are suggested to support notion (i) and could also provide predictions on neural activity. We also present a behavioral prediction of our model, through simulation of inter‐temporal choice, on how the balance between the two pathways relates to the subject's time preference. These results indicate that our model, incorporating the heterogeneity of the cortical influence on the basal ganglia, is expected to provide a closed‐circuit mechanistic understanding of appetitive/aversive learning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-25 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5034842/ /pubmed/26095906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12994 Text en © 2015 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Computational Neuroscience Morita, Kenji Kawaguchi, Yasuo Computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning |
title | Computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning |
title_full | Computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning |
title_fullStr | Computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning |
title_short | Computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning |
title_sort | computing reward‐prediction error: an integrated account of cortical timing and basal‐ganglia pathways for appetitive and aversive learning |
topic | Computational Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26095906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moritakenji computingrewardpredictionerroranintegratedaccountofcorticaltimingandbasalgangliapathwaysforappetitiveandaversivelearning AT kawaguchiyasuo computingrewardpredictionerroranintegratedaccountofcorticaltimingandbasalgangliapathwaysforappetitiveandaversivelearning |