Cargando…

Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test

The Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) is a sensitive test for nonverbal fluency suitable for all age groups. However, assessment of performance on the RFFT is time-consuming and may be affected by interrater differences. Therefore, we developed computer software specifically designed to analyze perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elderson, Martin F., Pham, Sander, van Eersel, Marlise E. A., Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H. R., Kok, Johan, Gansevoort, Ron T., Tucha, Oliver, van der Klauw, Melanie M., Slaets, Joris P. J., Izaks, Gerbrand J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163286
_version_ 1782455364840587264
author Elderson, Martin F.
Pham, Sander
van Eersel, Marlise E. A.
Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H. R.
Kok, Johan
Gansevoort, Ron T.
Tucha, Oliver
van der Klauw, Melanie M.
Slaets, Joris P. J.
Izaks, Gerbrand J.
author_facet Elderson, Martin F.
Pham, Sander
van Eersel, Marlise E. A.
Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H. R.
Kok, Johan
Gansevoort, Ron T.
Tucha, Oliver
van der Klauw, Melanie M.
Slaets, Joris P. J.
Izaks, Gerbrand J.
author_sort Elderson, Martin F.
collection PubMed
description The Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) is a sensitive test for nonverbal fluency suitable for all age groups. However, assessment of performance on the RFFT is time-consuming and may be affected by interrater differences. Therefore, we developed computer software specifically designed to analyze performance on the RFFT by automated pattern recognition. The aim of this study was to compare assessment by the new software with conventional assessment by human raters. The software was developed using data from the Lifelines Cohort Study and validated in an independent cohort of the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End Stage Disease (PREVEND) study. The total study population included 1,761 persons: 54% men; mean age (SD), 58 (10) years. All RFFT protocols were assessed by the new software and two independent human raters (criterion standard). The mean number of unique designs (SD) was 81 (29) and the median number of perseverative errors (interquartile range) was 9 (4 to 16). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the computerized and human assessment was 0.994 (95%CI, 0.988 to 0.996; p<0.001) and 0.991 (95%CI, 0.990 to 0.991; p<0.001) for the number of unique designs and perseverative errors, respectively. The mean difference (SD) between the computerized and human assessment was -1.42 (2.78) and +0.02 (1.94) points for the number of unique designs and perseverative errors, respectively. This was comparable to the agreement between two independent human assessments: ICC, 0.995 (0.994 to 0.995; p<0.001) and 0.985 (0.982 to 0.988; p<0.001), and mean difference (SD), -0.44 (2.98) and +0.56 (2.36) points for the number of unique designs and perseverative errors, respectively. We conclude that the agreement between the computerized and human assessment was very high and comparable to the agreement between two independent human assessments. Therefore, the software is an accurate tool for the assessment of performance on the RFFT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5035016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50350162016-10-10 Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test Elderson, Martin F. Pham, Sander van Eersel, Marlise E. A. Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H. R. Kok, Johan Gansevoort, Ron T. Tucha, Oliver van der Klauw, Melanie M. Slaets, Joris P. J. Izaks, Gerbrand J. PLoS One Research Article The Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) is a sensitive test for nonverbal fluency suitable for all age groups. However, assessment of performance on the RFFT is time-consuming and may be affected by interrater differences. Therefore, we developed computer software specifically designed to analyze performance on the RFFT by automated pattern recognition. The aim of this study was to compare assessment by the new software with conventional assessment by human raters. The software was developed using data from the Lifelines Cohort Study and validated in an independent cohort of the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End Stage Disease (PREVEND) study. The total study population included 1,761 persons: 54% men; mean age (SD), 58 (10) years. All RFFT protocols were assessed by the new software and two independent human raters (criterion standard). The mean number of unique designs (SD) was 81 (29) and the median number of perseverative errors (interquartile range) was 9 (4 to 16). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the computerized and human assessment was 0.994 (95%CI, 0.988 to 0.996; p<0.001) and 0.991 (95%CI, 0.990 to 0.991; p<0.001) for the number of unique designs and perseverative errors, respectively. The mean difference (SD) between the computerized and human assessment was -1.42 (2.78) and +0.02 (1.94) points for the number of unique designs and perseverative errors, respectively. This was comparable to the agreement between two independent human assessments: ICC, 0.995 (0.994 to 0.995; p<0.001) and 0.985 (0.982 to 0.988; p<0.001), and mean difference (SD), -0.44 (2.98) and +0.56 (2.36) points for the number of unique designs and perseverative errors, respectively. We conclude that the agreement between the computerized and human assessment was very high and comparable to the agreement between two independent human assessments. Therefore, the software is an accurate tool for the assessment of performance on the RFFT. Public Library of Science 2016-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5035016/ /pubmed/27661083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163286 Text en © 2016 Elderson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elderson, Martin F.
Pham, Sander
van Eersel, Marlise E. A.
Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H. R.
Kok, Johan
Gansevoort, Ron T.
Tucha, Oliver
van der Klauw, Melanie M.
Slaets, Joris P. J.
Izaks, Gerbrand J.
Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test
title Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test
title_full Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test
title_fullStr Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test
title_full_unstemmed Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test
title_short Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test
title_sort agreement between computerized and human assessment of performance on the ruff figural fluency test
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163286
work_keys_str_mv AT eldersonmartinf agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT phamsander agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT vaneerselmarliseea agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT wolffenbuttelbrucehr agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT kokjohan agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT gansevoortront agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT tuchaoliver agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT vanderklauwmelaniem agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT slaetsjorispj agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest
AT izaksgerbrandj agreementbetweencomputerizedandhumanassessmentofperformanceontherufffiguralfluencytest