Cargando…

Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach”

INTRODUCTION: Balancing reliability and resource limitations as well as recruitment activities during admission interviews is a challenge for many medical schools. The Modified Personal Interview (MPI) has been shown to have good psychometric properties while being resource efficient for specialized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanson, Mark D., Woods, Nicole N., Martimianakis, Maria Athina, Rasasingham, Raj, Kulasegaram, Kulamakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27638394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0298-9
_version_ 1782455392312229888
author Hanson, Mark D.
Woods, Nicole N.
Martimianakis, Maria Athina
Rasasingham, Raj
Kulasegaram, Kulamakan
author_facet Hanson, Mark D.
Woods, Nicole N.
Martimianakis, Maria Athina
Rasasingham, Raj
Kulasegaram, Kulamakan
author_sort Hanson, Mark D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Balancing reliability and resource limitations as well as recruitment activities during admission interviews is a challenge for many medical schools. The Modified Personal Interview (MPI) has been shown to have good psychometric properties while being resource efficient for specialized admission interviews. We describe implementation of an MPI adaptation integrating psychometric rigour alongside resourcing and recruitment goals for larger-scale medical school admission interviewing at the University of Toronto. METHODS: The MPI was implemented during the 2013–2014 admission cycle. The MPI uses multiple independent sampling by having applicants interviewed in a circuit of four brief semi-structured interviews. Recruitment is reflected in a longer MPI interviewing time to foster a ‘human touch’. Psychometric evaluation includes generalizability studies to examine inter-interview reliability and other major sources of error variance. We evaluated MPI impact upon applicant recruitment yield and resourcing. RESULTS: MPI reliability is 0.56. MPI implementation maintained recruitment compared with previous year. MPI implementation required 160 interviewers for 600 applicants whereas for pre-MPI implementation 290 interviewers were required to interview 587 applicants. MPI score correlated with first year OSCE performance at 0.30 (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: MPI reliability is measured at 0.56 alongside enhanced resource utilization and maintenance of recruitment yield. This ‘intermediate approach’ may enable broader institutional uptake of integrated multiple independent sampling-based admission interviewing within institution-specific resourcing and recruitment goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5035284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50352842016-10-09 Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach” Hanson, Mark D. Woods, Nicole N. Martimianakis, Maria Athina Rasasingham, Raj Kulasegaram, Kulamakan Perspect Med Educ Original Article INTRODUCTION: Balancing reliability and resource limitations as well as recruitment activities during admission interviews is a challenge for many medical schools. The Modified Personal Interview (MPI) has been shown to have good psychometric properties while being resource efficient for specialized admission interviews. We describe implementation of an MPI adaptation integrating psychometric rigour alongside resourcing and recruitment goals for larger-scale medical school admission interviewing at the University of Toronto. METHODS: The MPI was implemented during the 2013–2014 admission cycle. The MPI uses multiple independent sampling by having applicants interviewed in a circuit of four brief semi-structured interviews. Recruitment is reflected in a longer MPI interviewing time to foster a ‘human touch’. Psychometric evaluation includes generalizability studies to examine inter-interview reliability and other major sources of error variance. We evaluated MPI impact upon applicant recruitment yield and resourcing. RESULTS: MPI reliability is 0.56. MPI implementation maintained recruitment compared with previous year. MPI implementation required 160 interviewers for 600 applicants whereas for pre-MPI implementation 290 interviewers were required to interview 587 applicants. MPI score correlated with first year OSCE performance at 0.30 (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: MPI reliability is measured at 0.56 alongside enhanced resource utilization and maintenance of recruitment yield. This ‘intermediate approach’ may enable broader institutional uptake of integrated multiple independent sampling-based admission interviewing within institution-specific resourcing and recruitment goals. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016-09-16 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5035284/ /pubmed/27638394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0298-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hanson, Mark D.
Woods, Nicole N.
Martimianakis, Maria Athina
Rasasingham, Raj
Kulasegaram, Kulamakan
Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach”
title Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach”
title_full Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach”
title_fullStr Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach”
title_full_unstemmed Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach”
title_short Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach”
title_sort multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an “intermediate approach”
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27638394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0298-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hansonmarkd multipleindependentsamplingwithinmedicalschooladmissioninterviewinganintermediateapproach
AT woodsnicolen multipleindependentsamplingwithinmedicalschooladmissioninterviewinganintermediateapproach
AT martimianakismariaathina multipleindependentsamplingwithinmedicalschooladmissioninterviewinganintermediateapproach
AT rasasinghamraj multipleindependentsamplingwithinmedicalschooladmissioninterviewinganintermediateapproach
AT kulasegaramkulamakan multipleindependentsamplingwithinmedicalschooladmissioninterviewinganintermediateapproach