Cargando…

Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients

BACKGROUND: The current study aims to compare the application and convenience of the upper arm port with the other two methods of implanted ports in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS: Currently, the standard of practice is placement of centra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yanhong, Cai, Yonghua, Gan, Xiaoqin, Ye, Xinmei, Ling, Jiayu, Kang, Liang, Ye, Junwen, Zhang, Xingwei, Zhang, Jianwei, Cai, Yue, Hu, Huabin, Huang, Meijin, Deng, Yanhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1002-6
_version_ 1782455416867782656
author Li, Yanhong
Cai, Yonghua
Gan, Xiaoqin
Ye, Xinmei
Ling, Jiayu
Kang, Liang
Ye, Junwen
Zhang, Xingwei
Zhang, Jianwei
Cai, Yue
Hu, Huabin
Huang, Meijin
Deng, Yanhong
author_facet Li, Yanhong
Cai, Yonghua
Gan, Xiaoqin
Ye, Xinmei
Ling, Jiayu
Kang, Liang
Ye, Junwen
Zhang, Xingwei
Zhang, Jianwei
Cai, Yue
Hu, Huabin
Huang, Meijin
Deng, Yanhong
author_sort Li, Yanhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current study aims to compare the application and convenience of the upper arm port with the other two methods of implanted ports in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS: Currently, the standard of practice is placement of central venous access via an internal jugular vein approach. Perioperative time, postoperative complications, and postoperative comfort level in patients receiving an implanted venous port in the upper arm were retrospectively compared to those in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein from April 2013 to November 2014. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-four patients are recruited for this analysis, consisting of 107 in the upper arm vein group, 70 in the jugular vein group, and 167 in the subclavian vein group. The occurrence of catheter misplacement in the upper arm vein is higher than that in the other two groups (13.1 vs. 2.9 vs. 5.4 %, respectively, P = 0.02), while the other complications in the perioperative period were not significantly different. The occurrence of transfusion obstacle of the upper arm vein group is significantly lower than that of the jugular and subclavian groups (0.9 vs. 7.1 vs. 7.2 %, P = 0.01). The occurrence of thrombus is also lower than that of other two groups (0.9 vs. 4.3 vs. 3.6 %, P = 0.03). Regarding the postoperative comfort, the influences of appearance (0 vs. 7.1 vs. 2.9 %, P = 0.006) and sleep (0.9 vs. 4.2 vs. 10.7 %, P = 0.003) are significantly better than those of the jugular and subclavian vein groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the jugular and the subclavian vein groups, the implanted venous port in the upper arm vein has fewer complications and more convenience and comfort, and might be a superior novel choice for patients requiring long-term chemotherapy or parenteral nutrition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5035459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50354592016-09-29 Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients Li, Yanhong Cai, Yonghua Gan, Xiaoqin Ye, Xinmei Ling, Jiayu Kang, Liang Ye, Junwen Zhang, Xingwei Zhang, Jianwei Cai, Yue Hu, Huabin Huang, Meijin Deng, Yanhong World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The current study aims to compare the application and convenience of the upper arm port with the other two methods of implanted ports in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS: Currently, the standard of practice is placement of central venous access via an internal jugular vein approach. Perioperative time, postoperative complications, and postoperative comfort level in patients receiving an implanted venous port in the upper arm were retrospectively compared to those in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein from April 2013 to November 2014. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-four patients are recruited for this analysis, consisting of 107 in the upper arm vein group, 70 in the jugular vein group, and 167 in the subclavian vein group. The occurrence of catheter misplacement in the upper arm vein is higher than that in the other two groups (13.1 vs. 2.9 vs. 5.4 %, respectively, P = 0.02), while the other complications in the perioperative period were not significantly different. The occurrence of transfusion obstacle of the upper arm vein group is significantly lower than that of the jugular and subclavian groups (0.9 vs. 7.1 vs. 7.2 %, P = 0.01). The occurrence of thrombus is also lower than that of other two groups (0.9 vs. 4.3 vs. 3.6 %, P = 0.03). Regarding the postoperative comfort, the influences of appearance (0 vs. 7.1 vs. 2.9 %, P = 0.006) and sleep (0.9 vs. 4.2 vs. 10.7 %, P = 0.003) are significantly better than those of the jugular and subclavian vein groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the jugular and the subclavian vein groups, the implanted venous port in the upper arm vein has fewer complications and more convenience and comfort, and might be a superior novel choice for patients requiring long-term chemotherapy or parenteral nutrition. BioMed Central 2016-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5035459/ /pubmed/27664131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1002-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Yanhong
Cai, Yonghua
Gan, Xiaoqin
Ye, Xinmei
Ling, Jiayu
Kang, Liang
Ye, Junwen
Zhang, Xingwei
Zhang, Jianwei
Cai, Yue
Hu, Huabin
Huang, Meijin
Deng, Yanhong
Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients
title Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients
title_full Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients
title_fullStr Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients
title_full_unstemmed Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients
title_short Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients
title_sort application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1002-6
work_keys_str_mv AT liyanhong applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT caiyonghua applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT ganxiaoqin applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT yexinmei applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT lingjiayu applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT kangliang applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT yejunwen applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT zhangxingwei applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT zhangjianwei applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT caiyue applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT huhuabin applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT huangmeijin applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients
AT dengyanhong applicationandcomparisonofdifferentimplantedportsinmalignanttumorpatients