Cargando…

Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening

BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the French-speaking region has an organized breast cancer (BC) screening program; in the German-speaking region, only opportunistic screening until recently had been offered. We evaluated factors associated with attendance to breast cancer screening in these two regions....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eichholzer, Monika, Richard, Aline, Rohrmann, Sabine, Schmid, Seraina M., Leo, Cornelia, Huang, Dorothy J., Güth, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1760-4
_version_ 1782455424734199808
author Eichholzer, Monika
Richard, Aline
Rohrmann, Sabine
Schmid, Seraina M.
Leo, Cornelia
Huang, Dorothy J.
Güth, Uwe
author_facet Eichholzer, Monika
Richard, Aline
Rohrmann, Sabine
Schmid, Seraina M.
Leo, Cornelia
Huang, Dorothy J.
Güth, Uwe
author_sort Eichholzer, Monika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the French-speaking region has an organized breast cancer (BC) screening program; in the German-speaking region, only opportunistic screening until recently had been offered. We evaluated factors associated with attendance to breast cancer screening in these two regions. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 50–69 year-old women (n = 2769) from the Swiss Health Survey 2012. Factors of interest included education level, place of residence, nationality, marital status, smoking history, alcohol consumption, physical activity, diet, self-perceived health, history of chronic diseases and mental distress, visits to medical doctors and cervical and colorectal cancer screening. Outcome measures were dichotomized into ≤2 years since most recent mammography versus >2 years or never. RESULTS: In the German- and French-speaking regions, mammography attendance within the last two years was 34.9 % and 77.8 %, respectively. In the French region, moderate alcohol consumption (adjusted OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.28–3.15) increased screening attendance. Compared to those with no visit to a physician during the recent year, women in both regions with such visits attended statistically significantly more often BC screening (1–5 times vs. no visit: German (adjusted OR 3.96, 95 % CI 2.58–6.09); French: OR 7.25, 95 % CI 4.04–13.01). Non-attendance to cervical screening had a negative effect in both the German (adjusted OR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.25–0.79) and the French region (adjusted OR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.35–0.91). The same was true for colorectal cancer screening (German (adjusted OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.52–0.84); French: OR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.33–0.83). No other factor was associated with BC screening and none of the tests of interaction comparing the two regions revealed statistically significant results. CONCLUSION: The effect of socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle, health factors and screening behavior other than mammography on non-attendance to BC screening did not differ between the two regions with mainly opportunistic and organized screening, respectively, and did not explain the large differences in attendance between regions. Other potential explanations such as public promotion of attendance for BC screening, physicians’ recommendations regarding mammography participation or women’s beliefs should be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5035496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50354962016-09-29 Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening Eichholzer, Monika Richard, Aline Rohrmann, Sabine Schmid, Seraina M. Leo, Cornelia Huang, Dorothy J. Güth, Uwe BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the French-speaking region has an organized breast cancer (BC) screening program; in the German-speaking region, only opportunistic screening until recently had been offered. We evaluated factors associated with attendance to breast cancer screening in these two regions. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 50–69 year-old women (n = 2769) from the Swiss Health Survey 2012. Factors of interest included education level, place of residence, nationality, marital status, smoking history, alcohol consumption, physical activity, diet, self-perceived health, history of chronic diseases and mental distress, visits to medical doctors and cervical and colorectal cancer screening. Outcome measures were dichotomized into ≤2 years since most recent mammography versus >2 years or never. RESULTS: In the German- and French-speaking regions, mammography attendance within the last two years was 34.9 % and 77.8 %, respectively. In the French region, moderate alcohol consumption (adjusted OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.28–3.15) increased screening attendance. Compared to those with no visit to a physician during the recent year, women in both regions with such visits attended statistically significantly more often BC screening (1–5 times vs. no visit: German (adjusted OR 3.96, 95 % CI 2.58–6.09); French: OR 7.25, 95 % CI 4.04–13.01). Non-attendance to cervical screening had a negative effect in both the German (adjusted OR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.25–0.79) and the French region (adjusted OR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.35–0.91). The same was true for colorectal cancer screening (German (adjusted OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.52–0.84); French: OR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.33–0.83). No other factor was associated with BC screening and none of the tests of interaction comparing the two regions revealed statistically significant results. CONCLUSION: The effect of socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle, health factors and screening behavior other than mammography on non-attendance to BC screening did not differ between the two regions with mainly opportunistic and organized screening, respectively, and did not explain the large differences in attendance between regions. Other potential explanations such as public promotion of attendance for BC screening, physicians’ recommendations regarding mammography participation or women’s beliefs should be further investigated. BioMed Central 2016-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5035496/ /pubmed/27663642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1760-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eichholzer, Monika
Richard, Aline
Rohrmann, Sabine
Schmid, Seraina M.
Leo, Cornelia
Huang, Dorothy J.
Güth, Uwe
Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening
title Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening
title_full Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening
title_fullStr Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening
title_full_unstemmed Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening
title_short Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening
title_sort breast cancer screening attendance in two swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1760-4
work_keys_str_mv AT eichholzermonika breastcancerscreeningattendanceintwoswissregionsdominatedbyopportunisticororganizedscreening
AT richardaline breastcancerscreeningattendanceintwoswissregionsdominatedbyopportunisticororganizedscreening
AT rohrmannsabine breastcancerscreeningattendanceintwoswissregionsdominatedbyopportunisticororganizedscreening
AT schmidserainam breastcancerscreeningattendanceintwoswissregionsdominatedbyopportunisticororganizedscreening
AT leocornelia breastcancerscreeningattendanceintwoswissregionsdominatedbyopportunisticororganizedscreening
AT huangdorothyj breastcancerscreeningattendanceintwoswissregionsdominatedbyopportunisticororganizedscreening
AT guthuwe breastcancerscreeningattendanceintwoswissregionsdominatedbyopportunisticororganizedscreening