Cargando…
Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study
Objective: This case–control study investigated the use of a low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol to measure motor cortex (M1) plasticity in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared with typically developing children (TDC). We hypothesized that impairm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2015.0183 |
_version_ | 1782455455326404608 |
---|---|
author | Pedapati, Ernest V. Gilbert, Donald L. Erickson, Craig A. Horn, Paul S. Shaffer, Rebecca C. Wink, Logan K. Laue, Cameron S. Wu, Steve W. |
author_facet | Pedapati, Ernest V. Gilbert, Donald L. Erickson, Craig A. Horn, Paul S. Shaffer, Rebecca C. Wink, Logan K. Laue, Cameron S. Wu, Steve W. |
author_sort | Pedapati, Ernest V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This case–control study investigated the use of a low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol to measure motor cortex (M1) plasticity in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared with typically developing children (TDC). We hypothesized that impairments in long-term potentiation-like properties represent a neurophysiological biomarker of abnormal cortical function in ASD. Methods: We studied youth with ASD aged 11–18 years and matched controls (TDC). Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) was delivered to the dominant M1 at an intensity of 70% of resting motor threshold. Suprathreshold single-pulse TMS was performed to compare amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) measured from surface electromyography electrodes on a target muscle before (20 pulses) and after (10 pulses/time point) iTBS at predefined timepoints (up to 30 minutes) to measure any potentiation effects. A linear mixed model was used to examine group differences in MEP amplitudes over time following iTBS. Results: Nine youth with ASD (mean age 15.6; 7 males; 6 right-hand dominant) and 9 TDC (mean age 14.5; 5 males; 9 right-hand dominant) participated. All subjects tolerated the procedure well. Both groups had a mean increase in excitability after iTBS for 30 minutes; however, the time course of excitability changes differed (F(9,144) = 2.05; p = 0.038). Post-hoc testing identified a significant decrease in amplitude of the ASD group at 20 minutes following iTBS compared with the TDC after correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate early evidence for a potential physiological biomarker of cortical plasticity in youth with ASD using a rapid low-intensity rTMS protocol with a discriminate measure at 20 minutes following stimulation. The procedure was well tolerated by all 18 participants. Future work will include modification of the protocol to improve the ability to distinguish subtypes of ASD based on behavioral and cognitive testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5035833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50358332016-10-04 Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study Pedapati, Ernest V. Gilbert, Donald L. Erickson, Craig A. Horn, Paul S. Shaffer, Rebecca C. Wink, Logan K. Laue, Cameron S. Wu, Steve W. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Original Articles Objective: This case–control study investigated the use of a low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol to measure motor cortex (M1) plasticity in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared with typically developing children (TDC). We hypothesized that impairments in long-term potentiation-like properties represent a neurophysiological biomarker of abnormal cortical function in ASD. Methods: We studied youth with ASD aged 11–18 years and matched controls (TDC). Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) was delivered to the dominant M1 at an intensity of 70% of resting motor threshold. Suprathreshold single-pulse TMS was performed to compare amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) measured from surface electromyography electrodes on a target muscle before (20 pulses) and after (10 pulses/time point) iTBS at predefined timepoints (up to 30 minutes) to measure any potentiation effects. A linear mixed model was used to examine group differences in MEP amplitudes over time following iTBS. Results: Nine youth with ASD (mean age 15.6; 7 males; 6 right-hand dominant) and 9 TDC (mean age 14.5; 5 males; 9 right-hand dominant) participated. All subjects tolerated the procedure well. Both groups had a mean increase in excitability after iTBS for 30 minutes; however, the time course of excitability changes differed (F(9,144) = 2.05; p = 0.038). Post-hoc testing identified a significant decrease in amplitude of the ASD group at 20 minutes following iTBS compared with the TDC after correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate early evidence for a potential physiological biomarker of cortical plasticity in youth with ASD using a rapid low-intensity rTMS protocol with a discriminate measure at 20 minutes following stimulation. The procedure was well tolerated by all 18 participants. Future work will include modification of the protocol to improve the ability to distinguish subtypes of ASD based on behavioral and cognitive testing. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016-09-01 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5035833/ /pubmed/27007257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2015.0183 Text en © Ernest V. Pedapati et al. 2016; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pedapati, Ernest V. Gilbert, Donald L. Erickson, Craig A. Horn, Paul S. Shaffer, Rebecca C. Wink, Logan K. Laue, Cameron S. Wu, Steve W. Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study |
title | Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study |
title_full | Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study |
title_short | Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study |
title_sort | abnormal cortical plasticity in youth with autism spectrum disorder: a transcranial magnetic stimulation case–control pilot study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2015.0183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedapatiernestv abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy AT gilbertdonaldl abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy AT ericksoncraiga abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy AT hornpauls abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy AT shafferrebeccac abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy AT winklogank abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy AT lauecamerons abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy AT wustevew abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy |