Cargando…

Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study

Objective: This case–control study investigated the use of a low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol to measure motor cortex (M1) plasticity in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared with typically developing children (TDC). We hypothesized that impairm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedapati, Ernest V., Gilbert, Donald L., Erickson, Craig A., Horn, Paul S., Shaffer, Rebecca C., Wink, Logan K., Laue, Cameron S., Wu, Steve W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2015.0183
_version_ 1782455455326404608
author Pedapati, Ernest V.
Gilbert, Donald L.
Erickson, Craig A.
Horn, Paul S.
Shaffer, Rebecca C.
Wink, Logan K.
Laue, Cameron S.
Wu, Steve W.
author_facet Pedapati, Ernest V.
Gilbert, Donald L.
Erickson, Craig A.
Horn, Paul S.
Shaffer, Rebecca C.
Wink, Logan K.
Laue, Cameron S.
Wu, Steve W.
author_sort Pedapati, Ernest V.
collection PubMed
description Objective: This case–control study investigated the use of a low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol to measure motor cortex (M1) plasticity in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared with typically developing children (TDC). We hypothesized that impairments in long-term potentiation-like properties represent a neurophysiological biomarker of abnormal cortical function in ASD. Methods: We studied youth with ASD aged 11–18 years and matched controls (TDC). Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) was delivered to the dominant M1 at an intensity of 70% of resting motor threshold. Suprathreshold single-pulse TMS was performed to compare amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) measured from surface electromyography electrodes on a target muscle before (20 pulses) and after (10 pulses/time point) iTBS at predefined timepoints (up to 30 minutes) to measure any potentiation effects. A linear mixed model was used to examine group differences in MEP amplitudes over time following iTBS. Results: Nine youth with ASD (mean age 15.6; 7 males; 6 right-hand dominant) and 9 TDC (mean age 14.5; 5 males; 9 right-hand dominant) participated. All subjects tolerated the procedure well. Both groups had a mean increase in excitability after iTBS for 30 minutes; however, the time course of excitability changes differed (F(9,144) = 2.05; p = 0.038). Post-hoc testing identified a significant decrease in amplitude of the ASD group at 20 minutes following iTBS compared with the TDC after correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate early evidence for a potential physiological biomarker of cortical plasticity in youth with ASD using a rapid low-intensity rTMS protocol with a discriminate measure at 20 minutes following stimulation. The procedure was well tolerated by all 18 participants. Future work will include modification of the protocol to improve the ability to distinguish subtypes of ASD based on behavioral and cognitive testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5035833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50358332016-10-04 Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study Pedapati, Ernest V. Gilbert, Donald L. Erickson, Craig A. Horn, Paul S. Shaffer, Rebecca C. Wink, Logan K. Laue, Cameron S. Wu, Steve W. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Original Articles Objective: This case–control study investigated the use of a low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol to measure motor cortex (M1) plasticity in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared with typically developing children (TDC). We hypothesized that impairments in long-term potentiation-like properties represent a neurophysiological biomarker of abnormal cortical function in ASD. Methods: We studied youth with ASD aged 11–18 years and matched controls (TDC). Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) was delivered to the dominant M1 at an intensity of 70% of resting motor threshold. Suprathreshold single-pulse TMS was performed to compare amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) measured from surface electromyography electrodes on a target muscle before (20 pulses) and after (10 pulses/time point) iTBS at predefined timepoints (up to 30 minutes) to measure any potentiation effects. A linear mixed model was used to examine group differences in MEP amplitudes over time following iTBS. Results: Nine youth with ASD (mean age 15.6; 7 males; 6 right-hand dominant) and 9 TDC (mean age 14.5; 5 males; 9 right-hand dominant) participated. All subjects tolerated the procedure well. Both groups had a mean increase in excitability after iTBS for 30 minutes; however, the time course of excitability changes differed (F(9,144) = 2.05; p = 0.038). Post-hoc testing identified a significant decrease in amplitude of the ASD group at 20 minutes following iTBS compared with the TDC after correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate early evidence for a potential physiological biomarker of cortical plasticity in youth with ASD using a rapid low-intensity rTMS protocol with a discriminate measure at 20 minutes following stimulation. The procedure was well tolerated by all 18 participants. Future work will include modification of the protocol to improve the ability to distinguish subtypes of ASD based on behavioral and cognitive testing. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016-09-01 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5035833/ /pubmed/27007257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2015.0183 Text en © Ernest V. Pedapati et al. 2016; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pedapati, Ernest V.
Gilbert, Donald L.
Erickson, Craig A.
Horn, Paul S.
Shaffer, Rebecca C.
Wink, Logan K.
Laue, Cameron S.
Wu, Steve W.
Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study
title Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study
title_full Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study
title_fullStr Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study
title_short Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case–Control Pilot Study
title_sort abnormal cortical plasticity in youth with autism spectrum disorder: a transcranial magnetic stimulation case–control pilot study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5035833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2015.0183
work_keys_str_mv AT pedapatiernestv abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy
AT gilbertdonaldl abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy
AT ericksoncraiga abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy
AT hornpauls abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy
AT shafferrebeccac abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy
AT winklogank abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy
AT lauecamerons abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy
AT wustevew abnormalcorticalplasticityinyouthwithautismspectrumdisorderatranscranialmagneticstimulationcasecontrolpilotstudy