Cargando…

Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators

OBJECTIVE: To identify existing quality indicators (QIs) for diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of patients with infectious diseases in primary care. DESIGN: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. We included studies with a description of the development of QIs for diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saust, Laura Trolle, Monrad, Rikke Nygaard, Hansen, Malene Plejdrup, Arpi, Magnus, Bjerrum, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207143
_version_ 1782455476222427136
author Saust, Laura Trolle
Monrad, Rikke Nygaard
Hansen, Malene Plejdrup
Arpi, Magnus
Bjerrum, Lars
author_facet Saust, Laura Trolle
Monrad, Rikke Nygaard
Hansen, Malene Plejdrup
Arpi, Magnus
Bjerrum, Lars
author_sort Saust, Laura Trolle
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify existing quality indicators (QIs) for diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of patients with infectious diseases in primary care. DESIGN: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. We included studies with a description of the development of QIs for diagnosis and antibiotic use in patients with infectious diseases in primary care. We extracted information about (1) type of infection; (2) target for quality assessment; (3) methodology used for developing the QIs; and (4) whether the QIs were developed for a national or international application. The QIs were organised into three categories: (1) QIs focusing on the diagnostic process; (2) QIs focusing on the decision to prescribe antibiotics; and (3) QIs concerning the choice of antibiotics. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in this review and a total of 130 QIs were identified. The majority (72%) of the QIs were focusing on choice of antibiotics, 22% concerned the decision to prescribe antibiotics, and few (6%) concerned the diagnostic process. Most QIs were either related to respiratory tract infections or not related to any type of infection. A consensus method (mainly the Delphi technique), based on either a literature study or national guidelines, was used for the development of QIs in all of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The small number of existing QIs predominantly focuses on the choice of antibiotics and is often drug-specific. There is a remarkable lack of diagnostic QIs. Future development of new QIs, especially disease-specific QIs concerning the diagnostic process, is needed. KEY POINTS: In order to improve the use of antibiotics in primary care, measurable instruments, such as quality indicators, are needed to assess the quality of care being provided. A total of 11 studies were found, including 130 quality indicators for diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care. The majority of the identified quality indicators were focusing on the choice of antibiotics and only a few concerned the diagnostic process. All quality indicators were developed by means of a consensus method and were often based on literature studies or guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5036015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50360152016-10-04 Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators Saust, Laura Trolle Monrad, Rikke Nygaard Hansen, Malene Plejdrup Arpi, Magnus Bjerrum, Lars Scand J Prim Health Care Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: To identify existing quality indicators (QIs) for diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of patients with infectious diseases in primary care. DESIGN: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. We included studies with a description of the development of QIs for diagnosis and antibiotic use in patients with infectious diseases in primary care. We extracted information about (1) type of infection; (2) target for quality assessment; (3) methodology used for developing the QIs; and (4) whether the QIs were developed for a national or international application. The QIs were organised into three categories: (1) QIs focusing on the diagnostic process; (2) QIs focusing on the decision to prescribe antibiotics; and (3) QIs concerning the choice of antibiotics. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in this review and a total of 130 QIs were identified. The majority (72%) of the QIs were focusing on choice of antibiotics, 22% concerned the decision to prescribe antibiotics, and few (6%) concerned the diagnostic process. Most QIs were either related to respiratory tract infections or not related to any type of infection. A consensus method (mainly the Delphi technique), based on either a literature study or national guidelines, was used for the development of QIs in all of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The small number of existing QIs predominantly focuses on the choice of antibiotics and is often drug-specific. There is a remarkable lack of diagnostic QIs. Future development of new QIs, especially disease-specific QIs concerning the diagnostic process, is needed. KEY POINTS: In order to improve the use of antibiotics in primary care, measurable instruments, such as quality indicators, are needed to assess the quality of care being provided. A total of 11 studies were found, including 130 quality indicators for diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care. The majority of the identified quality indicators were focusing on the choice of antibiotics and only a few concerned the diagnostic process. All quality indicators were developed by means of a consensus method and were often based on literature studies or guidelines. Taylor & Francis 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5036015/ /pubmed/27450462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207143 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Saust, Laura Trolle
Monrad, Rikke Nygaard
Hansen, Malene Plejdrup
Arpi, Magnus
Bjerrum, Lars
Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators
title Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators
title_full Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators
title_fullStr Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators
title_full_unstemmed Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators
title_short Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators
title_sort quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207143
work_keys_str_mv AT saustlauratrolle qualityassessmentofdiagnosisandantibiotictreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesinprimarycareasystematicreviewofqualityindicators
AT monradrikkenygaard qualityassessmentofdiagnosisandantibiotictreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesinprimarycareasystematicreviewofqualityindicators
AT hansenmaleneplejdrup qualityassessmentofdiagnosisandantibiotictreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesinprimarycareasystematicreviewofqualityindicators
AT arpimagnus qualityassessmentofdiagnosisandantibiotictreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesinprimarycareasystematicreviewofqualityindicators
AT bjerrumlars qualityassessmentofdiagnosisandantibiotictreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesinprimarycareasystematicreviewofqualityindicators