Cargando…
Why several truths can be true
In this paper, we offer a perspective on complementarity, acknowledging that it is not possible for human perception and cognition to grasp reality with unambiguous concepts or theories. Therefore, multiple concepts and perspectives are valid when they are not exaggerated beyond reasonable limits an...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207146 |
_version_ | 1782455476893515776 |
---|---|
author | Meland, Eivind Brodersen, John |
author_facet | Meland, Eivind Brodersen, John |
author_sort | Meland, Eivind |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, we offer a perspective on complementarity, acknowledging that it is not possible for human perception and cognition to grasp reality with unambiguous concepts or theories. Therefore, multiple concepts and perspectives are valid when they are not exaggerated beyond reasonable limits and do not claim exclusive validity. We recommend a humble stance enabling respectful dialogue between different perspectives in medical science and practice. KEY POINTS: No single perspective in clinical or scientific medicine can exhaustively explain medical phenomena. Scientific attitude is characterised by a willingness to look for objections against what we prefer as truths. Complementarity or unifying contradictions are concepts that allow for humility and pluralism in clinical and scientific medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5036018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50360182016-10-04 Why several truths can be true Meland, Eivind Brodersen, John Scand J Prim Health Care Analysis Paper In this paper, we offer a perspective on complementarity, acknowledging that it is not possible for human perception and cognition to grasp reality with unambiguous concepts or theories. Therefore, multiple concepts and perspectives are valid when they are not exaggerated beyond reasonable limits and do not claim exclusive validity. We recommend a humble stance enabling respectful dialogue between different perspectives in medical science and practice. KEY POINTS: No single perspective in clinical or scientific medicine can exhaustively explain medical phenomena. Scientific attitude is characterised by a willingness to look for objections against what we prefer as truths. Complementarity or unifying contradictions are concepts that allow for humility and pluralism in clinical and scientific medicine. Taylor & Francis 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5036018/ /pubmed/27406215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207146 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Analysis Paper Meland, Eivind Brodersen, John Why several truths can be true |
title | Why several truths can be true |
title_full | Why several truths can be true |
title_fullStr | Why several truths can be true |
title_full_unstemmed | Why several truths can be true |
title_short | Why several truths can be true |
title_sort | why several truths can be true |
topic | Analysis Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT melandeivind whyseveraltruthscanbetrue AT brodersenjohn whyseveraltruthscanbetrue |