Cargando…

Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)

BACKGROUND: Vibration-induced white finger (VWF) is the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Two tests have been standardised so as to assist the diagnosis of VWF: the measurement of finger rewarming times and the measurement of finger systolic blood pressures (FSBPs). OBJEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Ying, Griffin, Michael J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27535036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103688
_version_ 1782455522885107712
author Ye, Ying
Griffin, Michael J
author_facet Ye, Ying
Griffin, Michael J
author_sort Ye, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vibration-induced white finger (VWF) is the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Two tests have been standardised so as to assist the diagnosis of VWF: the measurement of finger rewarming times and the measurement of finger systolic blood pressures (FSBPs). OBJECTIVES: This study investigates whether the two tests distinguish between fingers with and without symptoms of whiteness and compares individual results between the two test methods. METHODS: In 60 men reporting symptoms of the HAVS, the times for their fingers to rewarm by 4°C (after immersion in 15°C water for 5 min) and FSBPs at 30°C, 15°C and 10°C were measured on the same day. RESULTS: There were significant increases in finger rewarming times and significant reductions in FSBPs at both 15°C and 10°C in fingers reported to suffer blanching. The FSBPs had sensitivities and specificities >90%, whereas the finger rewarming test had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 79%. Fingers having longer rewarming times had lower FSBPs at both temperatures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that, when the test conditions are controlled according to the relevant standard, finger rewarming times and FSBPs can provide useful information for the diagnosis of VWF, although FSBPs are more sensitive and more specific.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5036229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50362292016-10-17 Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) Ye, Ying Griffin, Michael J Occup Environ Med Methodology BACKGROUND: Vibration-induced white finger (VWF) is the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Two tests have been standardised so as to assist the diagnosis of VWF: the measurement of finger rewarming times and the measurement of finger systolic blood pressures (FSBPs). OBJECTIVES: This study investigates whether the two tests distinguish between fingers with and without symptoms of whiteness and compares individual results between the two test methods. METHODS: In 60 men reporting symptoms of the HAVS, the times for their fingers to rewarm by 4°C (after immersion in 15°C water for 5 min) and FSBPs at 30°C, 15°C and 10°C were measured on the same day. RESULTS: There were significant increases in finger rewarming times and significant reductions in FSBPs at both 15°C and 10°C in fingers reported to suffer blanching. The FSBPs had sensitivities and specificities >90%, whereas the finger rewarming test had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 79%. Fingers having longer rewarming times had lower FSBPs at both temperatures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that, when the test conditions are controlled according to the relevant standard, finger rewarming times and FSBPs can provide useful information for the diagnosis of VWF, although FSBPs are more sensitive and more specific. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10 2016-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5036229/ /pubmed/27535036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103688 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Methodology
Ye, Ying
Griffin, Michael J
Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)
title Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)
title_full Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)
title_fullStr Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)
title_short Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)
title_sort assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (havs)
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27535036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103688
work_keys_str_mv AT yeying assessmentoftwoalternativestandardisedtestsforthevascularcomponentofthehandarmvibrationsyndromehavs
AT griffinmichaelj assessmentoftwoalternativestandardisedtestsforthevascularcomponentofthehandarmvibrationsyndromehavs