Cargando…

Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users

The ability to detect a target signal masked by noise is improved in normal-hearing listeners when interaural phase differences (IPDs) between the ear signals exist either in the masker or in the signal. To improve binaural hearing in bilaterally implanted cochlear implant (BiCI) users, a coding str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zirn, Stefan, Arndt, Susan, Aschendorff, Antje, Laszig, Roland, Wesarg, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27659487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516665608
_version_ 1782455529843458048
author Zirn, Stefan
Arndt, Susan
Aschendorff, Antje
Laszig, Roland
Wesarg, Thomas
author_facet Zirn, Stefan
Arndt, Susan
Aschendorff, Antje
Laszig, Roland
Wesarg, Thomas
author_sort Zirn, Stefan
collection PubMed
description The ability to detect a target signal masked by noise is improved in normal-hearing listeners when interaural phase differences (IPDs) between the ear signals exist either in the masker or in the signal. To improve binaural hearing in bilaterally implanted cochlear implant (BiCI) users, a coding strategy providing the best possible access to IPD is highly desirable. In this study, we compared two coding strategies in BiCI users provided with CI systems from MED-EL (Innsbruck, Austria). The CI systems were bilaterally programmed either with the fine structure processing strategy FS4 or with the constant rate strategy high definition continuous interleaved sampling (HDCIS). Familiarization periods between 6 and 12 weeks were considered. The effect of IPD was measured in two types of experiments: (a) IPD detection thresholds with tonal signals addressing mainly one apical interaural electrode pair and (b) with speech in noise in terms of binaural speech intelligibility level differences (BILD) addressing multiple electrodes bilaterally. The results in (a) showed improved IPD detection thresholds with FS4 compared with HDCIS in four out of the seven BiCI users. In contrast, 12 BiCI users in (b) showed similar BILD with FS4 (0.6 ± 1.9 dB) and HDCIS (0.5 ± 2.0 dB). However, no correlation between results in (a) and (b) both obtained with FS4 was found. In conclusion, the degree of IPD sensitivity determined on an apical interaural electrode pair was not an indicator for BILD based on bilateral multielectrode stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5036260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50362602016-10-07 Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users Zirn, Stefan Arndt, Susan Aschendorff, Antje Laszig, Roland Wesarg, Thomas Trends Hear ISAAR Special Issue The ability to detect a target signal masked by noise is improved in normal-hearing listeners when interaural phase differences (IPDs) between the ear signals exist either in the masker or in the signal. To improve binaural hearing in bilaterally implanted cochlear implant (BiCI) users, a coding strategy providing the best possible access to IPD is highly desirable. In this study, we compared two coding strategies in BiCI users provided with CI systems from MED-EL (Innsbruck, Austria). The CI systems were bilaterally programmed either with the fine structure processing strategy FS4 or with the constant rate strategy high definition continuous interleaved sampling (HDCIS). Familiarization periods between 6 and 12 weeks were considered. The effect of IPD was measured in two types of experiments: (a) IPD detection thresholds with tonal signals addressing mainly one apical interaural electrode pair and (b) with speech in noise in terms of binaural speech intelligibility level differences (BILD) addressing multiple electrodes bilaterally. The results in (a) showed improved IPD detection thresholds with FS4 compared with HDCIS in four out of the seven BiCI users. In contrast, 12 BiCI users in (b) showed similar BILD with FS4 (0.6 ± 1.9 dB) and HDCIS (0.5 ± 2.0 dB). However, no correlation between results in (a) and (b) both obtained with FS4 was found. In conclusion, the degree of IPD sensitivity determined on an apical interaural electrode pair was not an indicator for BILD based on bilateral multielectrode stimulation. SAGE Publications 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5036260/ /pubmed/27659487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516665608 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle ISAAR Special Issue
Zirn, Stefan
Arndt, Susan
Aschendorff, Antje
Laszig, Roland
Wesarg, Thomas
Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort perception of interaural phase differences with envelope and fine structure coding strategies in bilateral cochlear implant users
topic ISAAR Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27659487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516665608
work_keys_str_mv AT zirnstefan perceptionofinterauralphasedifferenceswithenvelopeandfinestructurecodingstrategiesinbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT arndtsusan perceptionofinterauralphasedifferenceswithenvelopeandfinestructurecodingstrategiesinbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT aschendorffantje perceptionofinterauralphasedifferenceswithenvelopeandfinestructurecodingstrategiesinbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT laszigroland perceptionofinterauralphasedifferenceswithenvelopeandfinestructurecodingstrategiesinbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT wesargthomas perceptionofinterauralphasedifferenceswithenvelopeandfinestructurecodingstrategiesinbilateralcochlearimplantusers