Cargando…
Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids
The conversion of high-dose intravenous (IV) opioids to an equianalgesic epidural (EP) or intrathecal (IT) dose is a common clinical dilemma for which there is little evidence to guide practice. Expert opinion varies, though a 100 IV:10:EP:1 IT conversion ratio is commonly cited in the literature, e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703394 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S113216 |
_version_ | 1782455577442516992 |
---|---|
author | Gorlin, Andrew W Rosenfeld, David M Maloney, Jillian Wie, Christopher S McGarvey, Johnathan Trentman, Terrence L |
author_facet | Gorlin, Andrew W Rosenfeld, David M Maloney, Jillian Wie, Christopher S McGarvey, Johnathan Trentman, Terrence L |
author_sort | Gorlin, Andrew W |
collection | PubMed |
description | The conversion of high-dose intravenous (IV) opioids to an equianalgesic epidural (EP) or intrathecal (IT) dose is a common clinical dilemma for which there is little evidence to guide practice. Expert opinion varies, though a 100 IV:10:EP:1 IT conversion ratio is commonly cited in the literature, especially for morphine. In this study, the authors surveyed 724 pain specialists to elucidate the ratios that respondents apply to convert high-dose IV morphine, hydromorphone, and fentanyl to both EP and IT routes. Eighty-three respondents completed the survey. Conversion ratios were calculated and entered into graphical scatter plots. The data suggest that there is wide variation in how pain specialists convert high-dose IV opioids to EP and IT routes. The 100 IV:10 EP:1 IT ratio was the most common answer of survey respondent, especially for morphine, though also for hydromorphone and fentanyl. Furthermore, more respondents applied a more aggressive conversion strategy for hydromorphone and fentanyl, likely reflecting less spinal selectivity of those opioids compared with morphine. The authors conclude that there is little consensus on this issue and suggest that in the absence of better data, a conservative approach to opioid conversion between IV and neuraxial routes is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5036565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50365652016-10-04 Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids Gorlin, Andrew W Rosenfeld, David M Maloney, Jillian Wie, Christopher S McGarvey, Johnathan Trentman, Terrence L J Pain Res Original Research The conversion of high-dose intravenous (IV) opioids to an equianalgesic epidural (EP) or intrathecal (IT) dose is a common clinical dilemma for which there is little evidence to guide practice. Expert opinion varies, though a 100 IV:10:EP:1 IT conversion ratio is commonly cited in the literature, especially for morphine. In this study, the authors surveyed 724 pain specialists to elucidate the ratios that respondents apply to convert high-dose IV morphine, hydromorphone, and fentanyl to both EP and IT routes. Eighty-three respondents completed the survey. Conversion ratios were calculated and entered into graphical scatter plots. The data suggest that there is wide variation in how pain specialists convert high-dose IV opioids to EP and IT routes. The 100 IV:10 EP:1 IT ratio was the most common answer of survey respondent, especially for morphine, though also for hydromorphone and fentanyl. Furthermore, more respondents applied a more aggressive conversion strategy for hydromorphone and fentanyl, likely reflecting less spinal selectivity of those opioids compared with morphine. The authors conclude that there is little consensus on this issue and suggest that in the absence of better data, a conservative approach to opioid conversion between IV and neuraxial routes is warranted. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5036565/ /pubmed/27703394 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S113216 Text en © 2016 Gorlin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gorlin, Andrew W Rosenfeld, David M Maloney, Jillian Wie, Christopher S McGarvey, Johnathan Trentman, Terrence L Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids |
title | Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids |
title_full | Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids |
title_fullStr | Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids |
title_short | Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids |
title_sort | survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703394 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S113216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorlinandreww surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids AT rosenfelddavidm surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids AT maloneyjillian surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids AT wiechristophers surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids AT mcgarveyjohnathan surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids AT trentmanterrencel surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids |