Cargando…

Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids

The conversion of high-dose intravenous (IV) opioids to an equianalgesic epidural (EP) or intrathecal (IT) dose is a common clinical dilemma for which there is little evidence to guide practice. Expert opinion varies, though a 100 IV:10:EP:1 IT conversion ratio is commonly cited in the literature, e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorlin, Andrew W, Rosenfeld, David M, Maloney, Jillian, Wie, Christopher S, McGarvey, Johnathan, Trentman, Terrence L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703394
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S113216
_version_ 1782455577442516992
author Gorlin, Andrew W
Rosenfeld, David M
Maloney, Jillian
Wie, Christopher S
McGarvey, Johnathan
Trentman, Terrence L
author_facet Gorlin, Andrew W
Rosenfeld, David M
Maloney, Jillian
Wie, Christopher S
McGarvey, Johnathan
Trentman, Terrence L
author_sort Gorlin, Andrew W
collection PubMed
description The conversion of high-dose intravenous (IV) opioids to an equianalgesic epidural (EP) or intrathecal (IT) dose is a common clinical dilemma for which there is little evidence to guide practice. Expert opinion varies, though a 100 IV:10:EP:1 IT conversion ratio is commonly cited in the literature, especially for morphine. In this study, the authors surveyed 724 pain specialists to elucidate the ratios that respondents apply to convert high-dose IV morphine, hydromorphone, and fentanyl to both EP and IT routes. Eighty-three respondents completed the survey. Conversion ratios were calculated and entered into graphical scatter plots. The data suggest that there is wide variation in how pain specialists convert high-dose IV opioids to EP and IT routes. The 100 IV:10 EP:1 IT ratio was the most common answer of survey respondent, especially for morphine, though also for hydromorphone and fentanyl. Furthermore, more respondents applied a more aggressive conversion strategy for hydromorphone and fentanyl, likely reflecting less spinal selectivity of those opioids compared with morphine. The authors conclude that there is little consensus on this issue and suggest that in the absence of better data, a conservative approach to opioid conversion between IV and neuraxial routes is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5036565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50365652016-10-04 Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids Gorlin, Andrew W Rosenfeld, David M Maloney, Jillian Wie, Christopher S McGarvey, Johnathan Trentman, Terrence L J Pain Res Original Research The conversion of high-dose intravenous (IV) opioids to an equianalgesic epidural (EP) or intrathecal (IT) dose is a common clinical dilemma for which there is little evidence to guide practice. Expert opinion varies, though a 100 IV:10:EP:1 IT conversion ratio is commonly cited in the literature, especially for morphine. In this study, the authors surveyed 724 pain specialists to elucidate the ratios that respondents apply to convert high-dose IV morphine, hydromorphone, and fentanyl to both EP and IT routes. Eighty-three respondents completed the survey. Conversion ratios were calculated and entered into graphical scatter plots. The data suggest that there is wide variation in how pain specialists convert high-dose IV opioids to EP and IT routes. The 100 IV:10 EP:1 IT ratio was the most common answer of survey respondent, especially for morphine, though also for hydromorphone and fentanyl. Furthermore, more respondents applied a more aggressive conversion strategy for hydromorphone and fentanyl, likely reflecting less spinal selectivity of those opioids compared with morphine. The authors conclude that there is little consensus on this issue and suggest that in the absence of better data, a conservative approach to opioid conversion between IV and neuraxial routes is warranted. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5036565/ /pubmed/27703394 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S113216 Text en © 2016 Gorlin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gorlin, Andrew W
Rosenfeld, David M
Maloney, Jillian
Wie, Christopher S
McGarvey, Johnathan
Trentman, Terrence L
Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids
title Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids
title_full Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids
title_fullStr Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids
title_full_unstemmed Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids
title_short Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids
title_sort survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703394
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S113216
work_keys_str_mv AT gorlinandreww surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids
AT rosenfelddavidm surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids
AT maloneyjillian surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids
AT wiechristophers surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids
AT mcgarveyjohnathan surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids
AT trentmanterrencel surveyofpainspecialistsregardingconversionofhighdoseintravenoustoneuraxialopioids