Cargando…
Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation
AIM: To investigate clinicopathological features of early stage gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation (GCED). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated data on 6 cases of early stage GCED and 186 cases of early stage conventional gastric cancer (CGC: well or moderately differentiated aden...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8203 |
_version_ | 1782455662549139456 |
---|---|
author | Matsumoto, Kohei Ueyama, Hiroya Matsumoto, Kenshi Akazawa, Yoichi Komori, Hiroyuki Takeda, Tsutomu Murakami, Takashi Asaoka, Daisuke Hojo, Mariko Tomita, Natsumi Nagahara, Akihito Kajiyama, Yoshiaki Yao, Takashi Watanabe, Sumio |
author_facet | Matsumoto, Kohei Ueyama, Hiroya Matsumoto, Kenshi Akazawa, Yoichi Komori, Hiroyuki Takeda, Tsutomu Murakami, Takashi Asaoka, Daisuke Hojo, Mariko Tomita, Natsumi Nagahara, Akihito Kajiyama, Yoshiaki Yao, Takashi Watanabe, Sumio |
author_sort | Matsumoto, Kohei |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To investigate clinicopathological features of early stage gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation (GCED). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated data on 6 cases of early stage GCED and 186 cases of early stage conventional gastric cancer (CGC: well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma) who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection from September 2011 to February 2015 in our hospital. GCED was defined as a tumor having a primitive intestine-like structure composed of cuboidal or columnar cells with clear cytoplasm and immunohistochemical positivity for either alpha-fetoprotein, Glypican 3 or SALL4. The following were compared between GCED and CGC: age, gender, location and size of tumor, macroscopic type, ulceration, depth of invasion, lymphatic and venous invasion, positive horizontal and vertical margin, curative resection rate. RESULTS: Six cases (5 males, 1 female; mean age 75.7 years; 6 lesions) of early gastric cancer with a GCED component and 186 cases (139 males, 47 females; mean age 72.7 years; 209 lesions) of early stage CGC were investigated. Mean tumor diameters were similar but rates of submucosal invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and non-curative resection were higher in GCED than CGC (66.6% vs 11.4%, 33.3% vs 2.3%, 66.6% vs 0.4%, 83.3% vs 11% respectively, P < 0.01). Deep submucosal invasion was not revealed endoscopically or by preoperative biopsy. Histologically, in GCED the superficial mucosal layer was covered with a CGC component. The GCED component tended to exist in the deeper part of the mucosa to the submucosa by lymphatic and/or venous invasion, without severe stromal reaction. In addition, Glypican 3 was the most sensitive marker for GCED (positivity, 83.3%), immunohistochemically. CONCLUSION: Even in the early stage GCED has high malignant potential, and preoperative diagnosis is considered difficult. Endoscopists and pathologists should know the clinicopathological features of this highly malignant type of cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5037089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50370892016-09-29 Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation Matsumoto, Kohei Ueyama, Hiroya Matsumoto, Kenshi Akazawa, Yoichi Komori, Hiroyuki Takeda, Tsutomu Murakami, Takashi Asaoka, Daisuke Hojo, Mariko Tomita, Natsumi Nagahara, Akihito Kajiyama, Yoshiaki Yao, Takashi Watanabe, Sumio World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study AIM: To investigate clinicopathological features of early stage gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation (GCED). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated data on 6 cases of early stage GCED and 186 cases of early stage conventional gastric cancer (CGC: well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma) who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection from September 2011 to February 2015 in our hospital. GCED was defined as a tumor having a primitive intestine-like structure composed of cuboidal or columnar cells with clear cytoplasm and immunohistochemical positivity for either alpha-fetoprotein, Glypican 3 or SALL4. The following were compared between GCED and CGC: age, gender, location and size of tumor, macroscopic type, ulceration, depth of invasion, lymphatic and venous invasion, positive horizontal and vertical margin, curative resection rate. RESULTS: Six cases (5 males, 1 female; mean age 75.7 years; 6 lesions) of early gastric cancer with a GCED component and 186 cases (139 males, 47 females; mean age 72.7 years; 209 lesions) of early stage CGC were investigated. Mean tumor diameters were similar but rates of submucosal invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and non-curative resection were higher in GCED than CGC (66.6% vs 11.4%, 33.3% vs 2.3%, 66.6% vs 0.4%, 83.3% vs 11% respectively, P < 0.01). Deep submucosal invasion was not revealed endoscopically or by preoperative biopsy. Histologically, in GCED the superficial mucosal layer was covered with a CGC component. The GCED component tended to exist in the deeper part of the mucosa to the submucosa by lymphatic and/or venous invasion, without severe stromal reaction. In addition, Glypican 3 was the most sensitive marker for GCED (positivity, 83.3%), immunohistochemically. CONCLUSION: Even in the early stage GCED has high malignant potential, and preoperative diagnosis is considered difficult. Endoscopists and pathologists should know the clinicopathological features of this highly malignant type of cancer. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016-09-28 2016-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5037089/ /pubmed/27688662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8203 Text en ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Matsumoto, Kohei Ueyama, Hiroya Matsumoto, Kenshi Akazawa, Yoichi Komori, Hiroyuki Takeda, Tsutomu Murakami, Takashi Asaoka, Daisuke Hojo, Mariko Tomita, Natsumi Nagahara, Akihito Kajiyama, Yoshiaki Yao, Takashi Watanabe, Sumio Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation |
title | Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation |
title_full | Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation |
title_fullStr | Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation |
title_short | Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation |
title_sort | clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsumotokohei clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT ueyamahiroya clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT matsumotokenshi clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT akazawayoichi clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT komorihiroyuki clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT takedatsutomu clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT murakamitakashi clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT asaokadaisuke clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT hojomariko clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT tomitanatsumi clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT nagaharaakihito clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT kajiyamayoshiaki clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT yaotakashi clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation AT watanabesumio clinicopathologicalfeaturesofalphafetoproteinproducingearlygastriccancerwithenteroblasticdifferentiation |