Cargando…

FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease

AIM: To evaluate the perspective of gastroenterologists regarding the impact of fecal calprotectin (FC) on the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Patients with known IBD or symptoms suggestive of IBD for whom the physician identified that FC would be clinically us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenfeld, Greg, Greenup, Astrid-Jane, Round, Andrew, Takach, Oliver, Halparin, Lawrence, Saadeddin, Abid, Ho, Jin Kee, Lee, Terry, Enns, Robert, Bressler, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8211
_version_ 1782455662782971904
author Rosenfeld, Greg
Greenup, Astrid-Jane
Round, Andrew
Takach, Oliver
Halparin, Lawrence
Saadeddin, Abid
Ho, Jin Kee
Lee, Terry
Enns, Robert
Bressler, Brian
author_facet Rosenfeld, Greg
Greenup, Astrid-Jane
Round, Andrew
Takach, Oliver
Halparin, Lawrence
Saadeddin, Abid
Ho, Jin Kee
Lee, Terry
Enns, Robert
Bressler, Brian
author_sort Rosenfeld, Greg
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the perspective of gastroenterologists regarding the impact of fecal calprotectin (FC) on the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Patients with known IBD or symptoms suggestive of IBD for whom the physician identified that FC would be clinically useful were recruited. Physicians completed an online “pre survey” outlining their rationale for the test. After receipt of the test results, the physicians completed an online “post survey” to portray their perceived impact of the test result on patient management. Clinical outcomes for a subset of patients with follow-up data available beyond the completion of the “post survey” were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 373 test kits distributed, 290 were returned, resulting in 279 fully completed surveys. One hundred and ninety patients were known to have IBD; 147 (77%) with Crohn’s Disease, 43 (21%) Ulcerative Colitis and 5 (2%) IBD unclassified. Indications for FC testing included: 90 (32.2%) to differentiate a new diagnosis of IBD from Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), 85 (30.5%) to distinguish symptoms of IBS from IBD in those known to have IBD and 104 (37.2%) as an objective measure of inflammation. FC levels resulted in a change in management 51.3% (143/279) of the time which included a significant reduction in the number of colonoscopies (118) performed (P < 0.001). Overall, 97.5% (272/279) of the time, the physicians found the test sufficiently useful that they would order it again in similar situations. Follow-up data was available for 172 patients with further support for the clinical utility of FC provided. CONCLUSION: The FC test effected a change in management 51.3% of the time and receipt of the result was associated with a reduction in the number of colonoscopies performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5037090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50370902016-09-29 FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease Rosenfeld, Greg Greenup, Astrid-Jane Round, Andrew Takach, Oliver Halparin, Lawrence Saadeddin, Abid Ho, Jin Kee Lee, Terry Enns, Robert Bressler, Brian World J Gastroenterol Observational Study AIM: To evaluate the perspective of gastroenterologists regarding the impact of fecal calprotectin (FC) on the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Patients with known IBD or symptoms suggestive of IBD for whom the physician identified that FC would be clinically useful were recruited. Physicians completed an online “pre survey” outlining their rationale for the test. After receipt of the test results, the physicians completed an online “post survey” to portray their perceived impact of the test result on patient management. Clinical outcomes for a subset of patients with follow-up data available beyond the completion of the “post survey” were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 373 test kits distributed, 290 were returned, resulting in 279 fully completed surveys. One hundred and ninety patients were known to have IBD; 147 (77%) with Crohn’s Disease, 43 (21%) Ulcerative Colitis and 5 (2%) IBD unclassified. Indications for FC testing included: 90 (32.2%) to differentiate a new diagnosis of IBD from Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), 85 (30.5%) to distinguish symptoms of IBS from IBD in those known to have IBD and 104 (37.2%) as an objective measure of inflammation. FC levels resulted in a change in management 51.3% (143/279) of the time which included a significant reduction in the number of colonoscopies (118) performed (P < 0.001). Overall, 97.5% (272/279) of the time, the physicians found the test sufficiently useful that they would order it again in similar situations. Follow-up data was available for 172 patients with further support for the clinical utility of FC provided. CONCLUSION: The FC test effected a change in management 51.3% of the time and receipt of the result was associated with a reduction in the number of colonoscopies performed. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016-09-28 2016-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5037090/ /pubmed/27688663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8211 Text en ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Rosenfeld, Greg
Greenup, Astrid-Jane
Round, Andrew
Takach, Oliver
Halparin, Lawrence
Saadeddin, Abid
Ho, Jin Kee
Lee, Terry
Enns, Robert
Bressler, Brian
FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease
title FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease
title_full FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease
title_fullStr FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease
title_full_unstemmed FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease
title_short FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease
title_sort focus: future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8211
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenfeldgreg focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT greenupastridjane focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT roundandrew focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT takacholiver focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT halparinlawrence focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT saadeddinabid focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT hojinkee focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT leeterry focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT ennsrobert focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease
AT bresslerbrian focusfutureoffecalcalprotectinutilitystudyininflammatoryboweldisease