Cargando…
Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review
AIM: To perform a systematic review to grade guidelines and present recommendations for clinical management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: A database search was conducted on PubMed for guidelines published before May 2016, supplemented by reviewing relevant websites. The Appr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688665 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8226 |
_version_ | 1782455663245393920 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Jin-Zhou Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna Wan, Xing-Yong Fei, Su-Juan Pang, Xun-Lei Meng, Fan-Dong Yu, Chao-Hui Li, You-Ming |
author_facet | Zhu, Jin-Zhou Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna Wan, Xing-Yong Fei, Su-Juan Pang, Xun-Lei Meng, Fan-Dong Yu, Chao-Hui Li, You-Ming |
author_sort | Zhu, Jin-Zhou |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To perform a systematic review to grade guidelines and present recommendations for clinical management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: A database search was conducted on PubMed for guidelines published before May 2016, supplemented by reviewing relevant websites. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (ARGEE) Instrument II was a tool designed to appraise the methodological rigor and transparency in which a clinical guideline is developed and it is used internationally. It was used to appraise the quality of guidelines in this study. The inclusion criteria include: clinical NAFLD guidelines for adults, published in English, and released by governmental agencies or key organizations. RESULTS: Eleven guidelines were included in this study. Since 2007, guidelines have been released in Asia (3 in China, 1 in South Korea, and 1 in Japan), Europe (1 in Italy), America (1 in United States and 1 in Chile) and three international agencies [European associations joint, Asia-Pacific Working Party and World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO)]. Using the ARGEE II instrument, we found US 2012 and Europe 2016 had the highest scores, especially in the areas of rigor of development and applicability. Additionally, Italy 2010 and Korea 2013 also presented comprehensive content, rigorous procedures and good applicability. And WGO 2014 offered various algorithms for clinical practice. Lastly, a practical algorithm for the clinical management was developed, based on the recommended guidelines. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review of NAFLD guidelines. It may yield insights for physicians and policy-makers in the development and application of guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5037092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50370922016-09-29 Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review Zhu, Jin-Zhou Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna Wan, Xing-Yong Fei, Su-Juan Pang, Xun-Lei Meng, Fan-Dong Yu, Chao-Hui Li, You-Ming World J Gastroenterol Systematic Reviews AIM: To perform a systematic review to grade guidelines and present recommendations for clinical management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: A database search was conducted on PubMed for guidelines published before May 2016, supplemented by reviewing relevant websites. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (ARGEE) Instrument II was a tool designed to appraise the methodological rigor and transparency in which a clinical guideline is developed and it is used internationally. It was used to appraise the quality of guidelines in this study. The inclusion criteria include: clinical NAFLD guidelines for adults, published in English, and released by governmental agencies or key organizations. RESULTS: Eleven guidelines were included in this study. Since 2007, guidelines have been released in Asia (3 in China, 1 in South Korea, and 1 in Japan), Europe (1 in Italy), America (1 in United States and 1 in Chile) and three international agencies [European associations joint, Asia-Pacific Working Party and World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO)]. Using the ARGEE II instrument, we found US 2012 and Europe 2016 had the highest scores, especially in the areas of rigor of development and applicability. Additionally, Italy 2010 and Korea 2013 also presented comprehensive content, rigorous procedures and good applicability. And WGO 2014 offered various algorithms for clinical practice. Lastly, a practical algorithm for the clinical management was developed, based on the recommended guidelines. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review of NAFLD guidelines. It may yield insights for physicians and policy-makers in the development and application of guidelines. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016-09-28 2016-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5037092/ /pubmed/27688665 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8226 Text en ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Zhu, Jin-Zhou Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna Wan, Xing-Yong Fei, Su-Juan Pang, Xun-Lei Meng, Fan-Dong Yu, Chao-Hui Li, You-Ming Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review |
title | Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review |
title_full | Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review |
title_short | Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review |
title_sort | clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688665 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhujinzhou clinicalguidelinesofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseasystematicreview AT hollishansenkelseanna clinicalguidelinesofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseasystematicreview AT wanxingyong clinicalguidelinesofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseasystematicreview AT feisujuan clinicalguidelinesofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseasystematicreview AT pangxunlei clinicalguidelinesofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseasystematicreview AT mengfandong clinicalguidelinesofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseasystematicreview AT yuchaohui clinicalguidelinesofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseasystematicreview AT liyouming clinicalguidelinesofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseasystematicreview |