Cargando…

The impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice

BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) has the potential to cause irreversible blindness and stroke in affected patients [1–4]. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains the gold standard test for GCA [6–8]. Recent literature suggests that TAB does not change management of patients with suspected GCA and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cristaudo, Adam Thomas, Mizumoto, Ryo, Hendahewa, Rasika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27699002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.09.004
_version_ 1782455669291483136
author Cristaudo, Adam Thomas
Mizumoto, Ryo
Hendahewa, Rasika
author_facet Cristaudo, Adam Thomas
Mizumoto, Ryo
Hendahewa, Rasika
author_sort Cristaudo, Adam Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) has the potential to cause irreversible blindness and stroke in affected patients [1–4]. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains the gold standard test for GCA [6–8]. Recent literature suggests that TAB does not change management of patients with suspected GCA and that ultrasound scan (USS) may be sufficient enough alone to confirm the diagnosis [9–11,13]. The aim of this study is to therefore determine the impact of TAB on current surgical practice and emergency theatre services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was performed of patients who had undergone TAB at the Caboolture Hospital from January 2010 to September 2015. Demographic and clinical data was collected from patient's medical records in regards to GCA. RESULTS: A total of 55 TAB were performed on 50 patients. Only two TAB were positive for GCA. Thirty-eight (76%) patients had a pre-TAB ACR criteria score of ≥3. Pre-operative corticosteroids were administered in forty-five (90%) patients, on average 4 ± 10 days pre-TAB. Mean time to TAB was 1.6 ± 1.6 days following their booking. Ninety-one percent of TAB were performed by surgical registrars. All TAB were performed using local anaesthesia alone. CONCLUSIONS: TAB is an expensive procedure with a low positive yield. Recent evidence suggests promising results with USS in diagnosing GCA. With the exceedingly low positive TAB results found in this study, patients with suspected GCA should be investigated in accordance with the above algorithm. The routine use of USS will reduce the number of negative TAB performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5037119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50371192016-10-03 The impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice Cristaudo, Adam Thomas Mizumoto, Ryo Hendahewa, Rasika Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) has the potential to cause irreversible blindness and stroke in affected patients [1–4]. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains the gold standard test for GCA [6–8]. Recent literature suggests that TAB does not change management of patients with suspected GCA and that ultrasound scan (USS) may be sufficient enough alone to confirm the diagnosis [9–11,13]. The aim of this study is to therefore determine the impact of TAB on current surgical practice and emergency theatre services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was performed of patients who had undergone TAB at the Caboolture Hospital from January 2010 to September 2015. Demographic and clinical data was collected from patient's medical records in regards to GCA. RESULTS: A total of 55 TAB were performed on 50 patients. Only two TAB were positive for GCA. Thirty-eight (76%) patients had a pre-TAB ACR criteria score of ≥3. Pre-operative corticosteroids were administered in forty-five (90%) patients, on average 4 ± 10 days pre-TAB. Mean time to TAB was 1.6 ± 1.6 days following their booking. Ninety-one percent of TAB were performed by surgical registrars. All TAB were performed using local anaesthesia alone. CONCLUSIONS: TAB is an expensive procedure with a low positive yield. Recent evidence suggests promising results with USS in diagnosing GCA. With the exceedingly low positive TAB results found in this study, patients with suspected GCA should be investigated in accordance with the above algorithm. The routine use of USS will reduce the number of negative TAB performed. Elsevier 2016-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5037119/ /pubmed/27699002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.09.004 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cristaudo, Adam Thomas
Mizumoto, Ryo
Hendahewa, Rasika
The impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice
title The impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice
title_full The impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice
title_fullStr The impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice
title_full_unstemmed The impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice
title_short The impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice
title_sort impact of temporal artery biopsy on surgical practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27699002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.09.004
work_keys_str_mv AT cristaudoadamthomas theimpactoftemporalarterybiopsyonsurgicalpractice
AT mizumotoryo theimpactoftemporalarterybiopsyonsurgicalpractice
AT hendahewarasika theimpactoftemporalarterybiopsyonsurgicalpractice
AT cristaudoadamthomas impactoftemporalarterybiopsyonsurgicalpractice
AT mizumotoryo impactoftemporalarterybiopsyonsurgicalpractice
AT hendahewarasika impactoftemporalarterybiopsyonsurgicalpractice