Cargando…

Supplemental Protein during Heavy Cycling Training and Recovery Impacts Skeletal Muscle and Heart Rate Responses but Not Performance

The effects of protein supplementation on cycling performance, skeletal muscle function, and heart rate responses to exercise were examined following intensified (ICT) and reduced-volume training (RVT). Seven cyclists performed consecutive periods of normal training (NT), ICT (10 days; average train...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Lugos, Andrew C., Luden, Nicholas D., Faller, Justin M., Akers, Jeremy D., McKenzie, Alec I., Saunders, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8090550
_version_ 1782455757550125056
author D’Lugos, Andrew C.
Luden, Nicholas D.
Faller, Justin M.
Akers, Jeremy D.
McKenzie, Alec I.
Saunders, Michael J.
author_facet D’Lugos, Andrew C.
Luden, Nicholas D.
Faller, Justin M.
Akers, Jeremy D.
McKenzie, Alec I.
Saunders, Michael J.
author_sort D’Lugos, Andrew C.
collection PubMed
description The effects of protein supplementation on cycling performance, skeletal muscle function, and heart rate responses to exercise were examined following intensified (ICT) and reduced-volume training (RVT). Seven cyclists performed consecutive periods of normal training (NT), ICT (10 days; average training duration 220% of NT), and RVT (10 days; training duration 66% of NT). In a crossover design, subjects consumed supplemental carbohydrate (CHO) or an equal amount of carbohydrate with added protein (CP) during and following each exercise session (CP = +0.94 g/kg/day protein during ICT; +0.39 g/kg/day during RVT). A 30-kilometer time trial performance (following 120 min at 50% W(max)) was modestly impaired following ICT (+2.4 ± 6.4% versus NT) and returned to baseline levels following RVT (−0.7 ± 4.5% versus NT), with similar responses between CHO and CP. Skeletal muscle torque at 120 deg/s benefited from CP, compared to CHO, following ICT. However, this effect was no longer present at RVT. Following ICT, muscle fiber cross-sectional area was increased with CP, while there were no clear changes with CHO. Reductions in constant-load heart rates (at 50% W(max)) following RVT were likely greater with CP than CHO (−9 ± 9 bpm). Overall it appears that CP supplementation impacted skeletal muscle and heart rate responses during a period of heavy training and recovery, but this did not result in meaningful changes in time trial performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5037535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50375352016-10-15 Supplemental Protein during Heavy Cycling Training and Recovery Impacts Skeletal Muscle and Heart Rate Responses but Not Performance D’Lugos, Andrew C. Luden, Nicholas D. Faller, Justin M. Akers, Jeremy D. McKenzie, Alec I. Saunders, Michael J. Nutrients Article The effects of protein supplementation on cycling performance, skeletal muscle function, and heart rate responses to exercise were examined following intensified (ICT) and reduced-volume training (RVT). Seven cyclists performed consecutive periods of normal training (NT), ICT (10 days; average training duration 220% of NT), and RVT (10 days; training duration 66% of NT). In a crossover design, subjects consumed supplemental carbohydrate (CHO) or an equal amount of carbohydrate with added protein (CP) during and following each exercise session (CP = +0.94 g/kg/day protein during ICT; +0.39 g/kg/day during RVT). A 30-kilometer time trial performance (following 120 min at 50% W(max)) was modestly impaired following ICT (+2.4 ± 6.4% versus NT) and returned to baseline levels following RVT (−0.7 ± 4.5% versus NT), with similar responses between CHO and CP. Skeletal muscle torque at 120 deg/s benefited from CP, compared to CHO, following ICT. However, this effect was no longer present at RVT. Following ICT, muscle fiber cross-sectional area was increased with CP, while there were no clear changes with CHO. Reductions in constant-load heart rates (at 50% W(max)) following RVT were likely greater with CP than CHO (−9 ± 9 bpm). Overall it appears that CP supplementation impacted skeletal muscle and heart rate responses during a period of heavy training and recovery, but this did not result in meaningful changes in time trial performance. MDPI 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5037535/ /pubmed/27618091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8090550 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
D’Lugos, Andrew C.
Luden, Nicholas D.
Faller, Justin M.
Akers, Jeremy D.
McKenzie, Alec I.
Saunders, Michael J.
Supplemental Protein during Heavy Cycling Training and Recovery Impacts Skeletal Muscle and Heart Rate Responses but Not Performance
title Supplemental Protein during Heavy Cycling Training and Recovery Impacts Skeletal Muscle and Heart Rate Responses but Not Performance
title_full Supplemental Protein during Heavy Cycling Training and Recovery Impacts Skeletal Muscle and Heart Rate Responses but Not Performance
title_fullStr Supplemental Protein during Heavy Cycling Training and Recovery Impacts Skeletal Muscle and Heart Rate Responses but Not Performance
title_full_unstemmed Supplemental Protein during Heavy Cycling Training and Recovery Impacts Skeletal Muscle and Heart Rate Responses but Not Performance
title_short Supplemental Protein during Heavy Cycling Training and Recovery Impacts Skeletal Muscle and Heart Rate Responses but Not Performance
title_sort supplemental protein during heavy cycling training and recovery impacts skeletal muscle and heart rate responses but not performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8090550
work_keys_str_mv AT dlugosandrewc supplementalproteinduringheavycyclingtrainingandrecoveryimpactsskeletalmuscleandheartrateresponsesbutnotperformance
AT ludennicholasd supplementalproteinduringheavycyclingtrainingandrecoveryimpactsskeletalmuscleandheartrateresponsesbutnotperformance
AT fallerjustinm supplementalproteinduringheavycyclingtrainingandrecoveryimpactsskeletalmuscleandheartrateresponsesbutnotperformance
AT akersjeremyd supplementalproteinduringheavycyclingtrainingandrecoveryimpactsskeletalmuscleandheartrateresponsesbutnotperformance
AT mckenziealeci supplementalproteinduringheavycyclingtrainingandrecoveryimpactsskeletalmuscleandheartrateresponsesbutnotperformance
AT saundersmichaelj supplementalproteinduringheavycyclingtrainingandrecoveryimpactsskeletalmuscleandheartrateresponsesbutnotperformance