Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures

Context: Nutrition knowledge can influence dietary choices and impact on athletic performance. Valid and reliable measures are needed to assess the nutrition knowledge of athletes and coaches. Objectives: (1) To systematically review the published literature on nutrition knowledge of adult athletes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trakman, Gina L., Forsyth, Adrienne, Devlin, Brooke L., Belski, Regina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27649242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8090570
_version_ 1782455762142887936
author Trakman, Gina L.
Forsyth, Adrienne
Devlin, Brooke L.
Belski, Regina
author_facet Trakman, Gina L.
Forsyth, Adrienne
Devlin, Brooke L.
Belski, Regina
author_sort Trakman, Gina L.
collection PubMed
description Context: Nutrition knowledge can influence dietary choices and impact on athletic performance. Valid and reliable measures are needed to assess the nutrition knowledge of athletes and coaches. Objectives: (1) To systematically review the published literature on nutrition knowledge of adult athletes and coaches and (2) to assess the quality of measures used to assess nutrition knowledge. Data Sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscuss, Web of Science, and SCOPUS. Study Selection: 36 studies that provided a quantitative measure of nutrition knowledge and described the measurement tool that was used were included. Data extraction: Participant description, questionnaire description, results (mean correct and responses to individual items), study quality, and questionnaire quality. Data synthesis: All studies were of neutral quality. Tools used to measure knowledge did not consider health literacy, were outdated with regards to consensus recommendations, and lacked appropriate and adequate validation. The current status of nutrition knowledge in athletes and coaches is difficult to ascertain. Gaps in knowledge also remain unclear, but it is likely that energy density, the need for supplementation, and the role of protein are frequently misunderstood. Conclusions: Previous reports of nutrition knowledge need to be interpreted with caution. A new, universal, up-to-date, validated measure of general and sports nutrition knowledge is required to allow for assessment of nutrition knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5037555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50375552016-10-15 A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures Trakman, Gina L. Forsyth, Adrienne Devlin, Brooke L. Belski, Regina Nutrients Review Context: Nutrition knowledge can influence dietary choices and impact on athletic performance. Valid and reliable measures are needed to assess the nutrition knowledge of athletes and coaches. Objectives: (1) To systematically review the published literature on nutrition knowledge of adult athletes and coaches and (2) to assess the quality of measures used to assess nutrition knowledge. Data Sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscuss, Web of Science, and SCOPUS. Study Selection: 36 studies that provided a quantitative measure of nutrition knowledge and described the measurement tool that was used were included. Data extraction: Participant description, questionnaire description, results (mean correct and responses to individual items), study quality, and questionnaire quality. Data synthesis: All studies were of neutral quality. Tools used to measure knowledge did not consider health literacy, were outdated with regards to consensus recommendations, and lacked appropriate and adequate validation. The current status of nutrition knowledge in athletes and coaches is difficult to ascertain. Gaps in knowledge also remain unclear, but it is likely that energy density, the need for supplementation, and the role of protein are frequently misunderstood. Conclusions: Previous reports of nutrition knowledge need to be interpreted with caution. A new, universal, up-to-date, validated measure of general and sports nutrition knowledge is required to allow for assessment of nutrition knowledge. MDPI 2016-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5037555/ /pubmed/27649242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8090570 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Trakman, Gina L.
Forsyth, Adrienne
Devlin, Brooke L.
Belski, Regina
A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures
title A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures
title_full A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures
title_short A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures
title_sort systematic review of athletes’ and coaches’ nutrition knowledge and reflections on the quality of current nutrition knowledge measures
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27649242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8090570
work_keys_str_mv AT trakmanginal asystematicreviewofathletesandcoachesnutritionknowledgeandreflectionsonthequalityofcurrentnutritionknowledgemeasures
AT forsythadrienne asystematicreviewofathletesandcoachesnutritionknowledgeandreflectionsonthequalityofcurrentnutritionknowledgemeasures
AT devlinbrookel asystematicreviewofathletesandcoachesnutritionknowledgeandreflectionsonthequalityofcurrentnutritionknowledgemeasures
AT belskiregina asystematicreviewofathletesandcoachesnutritionknowledgeandreflectionsonthequalityofcurrentnutritionknowledgemeasures
AT trakmanginal systematicreviewofathletesandcoachesnutritionknowledgeandreflectionsonthequalityofcurrentnutritionknowledgemeasures
AT forsythadrienne systematicreviewofathletesandcoachesnutritionknowledgeandreflectionsonthequalityofcurrentnutritionknowledgemeasures
AT devlinbrookel systematicreviewofathletesandcoachesnutritionknowledgeandreflectionsonthequalityofcurrentnutritionknowledgemeasures
AT belskiregina systematicreviewofathletesandcoachesnutritionknowledgeandreflectionsonthequalityofcurrentnutritionknowledgemeasures