Cargando…
A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Comparing radiation treatment plans to ascertain the optimal intensity-modulated radiation technique for low-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Treatment plans for 20 randomly selected patients were generated using the same dose objectives. A dosimetric comparison was performed between vario...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27671348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0707-6 |
_version_ | 1782455774260232192 |
---|---|
author | Scobioala, Sergiu Kittel, Christopher Wissmann, Nicolas Haverkamp, Uwe Channaoui, Mohammed Habibeh, Omar Elsayad, Khaled Eich, Hans Theodor |
author_facet | Scobioala, Sergiu Kittel, Christopher Wissmann, Nicolas Haverkamp, Uwe Channaoui, Mohammed Habibeh, Omar Elsayad, Khaled Eich, Hans Theodor |
author_sort | Scobioala, Sergiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Comparing radiation treatment plans to ascertain the optimal intensity-modulated radiation technique for low-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Treatment plans for 20 randomly selected patients were generated using the same dose objectives. A dosimetric comparison was performed between various intensity-modulated techniques, including protons. All treatment plans provided conventional treatment with 79.2Gy. Dosimetric indices for the target volume and organs at risk (OAR), including homogeneity index and four conformity indices were analyzed. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between techniques were observed for homogeneity values. Dose distributions showed significant differences at low-to-medium doses. At doses above 50Gy all techniques revealed a steep dose gradient outside the planning target volume (PTV). Protons demonstrated superior rectum sparing at low-to-higher doses (V10-V70, P < .05) and bladder sparing at low-to-medium doses (V10–V30, P < .05). Helical tomotherapy (HT) provided superior rectum sparing compared to Sliding Window (SW) and Rapid Arc (RA) (V10–V70, P < .05). SW displayed superior bladder sparing compared to HT and RA (V10–V50, P < .05). Protons generated significantly higher femoral heads exposure and HT had superior sparing of those. CONCLUSION: All techniques are able to provide a homogeneous and highly conformal dose distribution. Protons demonstrated superior sparing of the rectum and bladder at a wide dose spectrum. The radiation technique itself as well as treatment planning algorithms result in different OAR sparing between HT, SW and RA, with superior rectum sparing by HT and superior bladder sparing by SW. Radiation plans can be further optimized by individual modification of dose objectives dependent on treatment plan strategy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0707-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5037612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50376122016-10-05 A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma Scobioala, Sergiu Kittel, Christopher Wissmann, Nicolas Haverkamp, Uwe Channaoui, Mohammed Habibeh, Omar Elsayad, Khaled Eich, Hans Theodor Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Comparing radiation treatment plans to ascertain the optimal intensity-modulated radiation technique for low-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Treatment plans for 20 randomly selected patients were generated using the same dose objectives. A dosimetric comparison was performed between various intensity-modulated techniques, including protons. All treatment plans provided conventional treatment with 79.2Gy. Dosimetric indices for the target volume and organs at risk (OAR), including homogeneity index and four conformity indices were analyzed. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between techniques were observed for homogeneity values. Dose distributions showed significant differences at low-to-medium doses. At doses above 50Gy all techniques revealed a steep dose gradient outside the planning target volume (PTV). Protons demonstrated superior rectum sparing at low-to-higher doses (V10-V70, P < .05) and bladder sparing at low-to-medium doses (V10–V30, P < .05). Helical tomotherapy (HT) provided superior rectum sparing compared to Sliding Window (SW) and Rapid Arc (RA) (V10–V70, P < .05). SW displayed superior bladder sparing compared to HT and RA (V10–V50, P < .05). Protons generated significantly higher femoral heads exposure and HT had superior sparing of those. CONCLUSION: All techniques are able to provide a homogeneous and highly conformal dose distribution. Protons demonstrated superior sparing of the rectum and bladder at a wide dose spectrum. The radiation technique itself as well as treatment planning algorithms result in different OAR sparing between HT, SW and RA, with superior rectum sparing by HT and superior bladder sparing by SW. Radiation plans can be further optimized by individual modification of dose objectives dependent on treatment plan strategy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0707-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5037612/ /pubmed/27671348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0707-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Scobioala, Sergiu Kittel, Christopher Wissmann, Nicolas Haverkamp, Uwe Channaoui, Mohammed Habibeh, Omar Elsayad, Khaled Eich, Hans Theodor A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma |
title | A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma |
title_full | A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma |
title_fullStr | A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma |
title_short | A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma |
title_sort | treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, sliding window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27671348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0707-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scobioalasergiu atreatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT kittelchristopher atreatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT wissmannnicolas atreatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT haverkampuwe atreatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT channaouimohammed atreatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT habibehomar atreatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT elsayadkhaled atreatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT eichhanstheodor atreatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT scobioalasergiu treatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT kittelchristopher treatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT wissmannnicolas treatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT haverkampuwe treatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT channaouimohammed treatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT habibehomar treatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT elsayadkhaled treatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma AT eichhanstheodor treatmentplanningstudycomparingtomotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyslidingwindowandprotontherapyforlowriskprostatecarcinoma |