Cargando…
The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: One of the best sources for high quality information about healthcare interventions is a systematic review. A well-conducted systematic review includes a comprehensive literature search. There is limited empiric evidence to guide the extent of searching, in particular the number of elect...
Autores principales: | Hartling, Lisa, Featherstone, Robin, Nuspl, Megan, Shave, Kassi, Dryden, Donna M., Vandermeer, Ben |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27670136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0232-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews
por: Hartling, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: systematic reviews of screening and treatment effectiveness and patient preferences
por: Wingert, Aireen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
From the Trenches: A Cross-Sectional Study Applying the GRADE Tool in Systematic Reviews of Healthcare Interventions
por: Hartling, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Parent experiences and information needs relating to procedural pain in children: a systematic review protocol
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Dissemination of evidence in paediatric emergency medicine: a quantitative descriptive evaluation of a 16-week social media promotion
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)