Cargando…

New Phase of Growth for Xenogeneic-Based Bioartificial Organs

In this article, we examine the advanced clinical development of bioartificial organs and describe the challenges to implementing such systems into patient care. The case for bioartificial organs is evident: they are meant to reduce patient morbidity and mortality caused by the persistent shortage o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pitkin, Zorina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657057
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091593
_version_ 1782455830093758464
author Pitkin, Zorina
author_facet Pitkin, Zorina
author_sort Pitkin, Zorina
collection PubMed
description In this article, we examine the advanced clinical development of bioartificial organs and describe the challenges to implementing such systems into patient care. The case for bioartificial organs is evident: they are meant to reduce patient morbidity and mortality caused by the persistent shortage of organs available for allotransplantation. The widespread introduction and adoption of bioengineered organs, incorporating cells and tissues derived from either human or animal sources, would help address this shortage. Despite the decades of development, the variety of organs studied and bioengineered, and continuous progress in the field, only two bioengineered systems are currently commercially available: Apligraf(®) and Dermagraft(®) are both approved by the FDA to treat diabetic foot ulcers, and Apligraf(®) is approved to treat venous leg ulcers. Currently, no products based on xenotransplantation have been approved by the FDA. Risk factors include immunological barriers and the potential infectivity of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV), which is unique to xenotransplantation. Recent breakthroughs in gene editing may, however, mitigate risks related to PERV. Because of its primary role in interrupting progress in xenotransplantation, we present a risk assessment for PERV infection, and conclude that the formerly high risk has been reduced to a moderate level. Advances in gene editing, and more broadly in the field, may make it more likely than ever before that bioartificial organs will alleviate the suffering of patients with organ failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5037858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50378582016-09-29 New Phase of Growth for Xenogeneic-Based Bioartificial Organs Pitkin, Zorina Int J Mol Sci Review In this article, we examine the advanced clinical development of bioartificial organs and describe the challenges to implementing such systems into patient care. The case for bioartificial organs is evident: they are meant to reduce patient morbidity and mortality caused by the persistent shortage of organs available for allotransplantation. The widespread introduction and adoption of bioengineered organs, incorporating cells and tissues derived from either human or animal sources, would help address this shortage. Despite the decades of development, the variety of organs studied and bioengineered, and continuous progress in the field, only two bioengineered systems are currently commercially available: Apligraf(®) and Dermagraft(®) are both approved by the FDA to treat diabetic foot ulcers, and Apligraf(®) is approved to treat venous leg ulcers. Currently, no products based on xenotransplantation have been approved by the FDA. Risk factors include immunological barriers and the potential infectivity of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV), which is unique to xenotransplantation. Recent breakthroughs in gene editing may, however, mitigate risks related to PERV. Because of its primary role in interrupting progress in xenotransplantation, we present a risk assessment for PERV infection, and conclude that the formerly high risk has been reduced to a moderate level. Advances in gene editing, and more broadly in the field, may make it more likely than ever before that bioartificial organs will alleviate the suffering of patients with organ failure. MDPI 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5037858/ /pubmed/27657057 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091593 Text en © 2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pitkin, Zorina
New Phase of Growth for Xenogeneic-Based Bioartificial Organs
title New Phase of Growth for Xenogeneic-Based Bioartificial Organs
title_full New Phase of Growth for Xenogeneic-Based Bioartificial Organs
title_fullStr New Phase of Growth for Xenogeneic-Based Bioartificial Organs
title_full_unstemmed New Phase of Growth for Xenogeneic-Based Bioartificial Organs
title_short New Phase of Growth for Xenogeneic-Based Bioartificial Organs
title_sort new phase of growth for xenogeneic-based bioartificial organs
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657057
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091593
work_keys_str_mv AT pitkinzorina newphaseofgrowthforxenogeneicbasedbioartificialorgans