Cargando…

Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if a durable bilayer implant composed of trabecular metal with autologous periosteum on top would be suitable to reconstitute large osteochondral defects. This design would allow for secure implant fixation, subsequent integration and remodeling. MATERIALS AND METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mrosek, E. H., Chung, H-W., Fitzsimmons, J. S., O’Driscoll, S. W., Reinholz, G. G., Schagemann, J. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0070.R1
_version_ 1782455851147067392
author Mrosek, E. H.
Chung, H-W.
Fitzsimmons, J. S.
O’Driscoll, S. W.
Reinholz, G. G.
Schagemann, J. C.
author_facet Mrosek, E. H.
Chung, H-W.
Fitzsimmons, J. S.
O’Driscoll, S. W.
Reinholz, G. G.
Schagemann, J. C.
author_sort Mrosek, E. H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if a durable bilayer implant composed of trabecular metal with autologous periosteum on top would be suitable to reconstitute large osteochondral defects. This design would allow for secure implant fixation, subsequent integration and remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult sheep were randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 8/group): 1. trabecular metal/periosteal graft (TMPG), 2. trabecular metal (TM), 3. empty defect (ED). Cartilage and bone healing were assessed macroscopically, biochemically (type II collagen, sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) content) and histologically. RESULTS: At 16 weeks post-operatively, histological scores amongst treatment groups were not statistically different (TMPG: overall 12.7, cartilage 8.6, bone 4.1; TM: overall 14.2, cartilage 9.5, bone 4.9; ED: overall 13.6, cartilage 9.1, bone 4.5). Metal scaffolds were incorporated into the surrounding bone, both in TM and TMPG. The sGAG yield was lower in the neo-cartilage regions compared with the articular cartilage (AC) controls (TMPG 20.8/AC 39.5, TM 25.6/AC 33.3, ED 32.2/AC 40.2 µg sGAG/1 mg respectively), with statistical significance being achieved for the TMPG group (p < 0.05). Hypercellularity of the neo-cartilage was found in TM and ED, as the dsDNA content was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared with contralateral AC controls (TM 126.7/AC 71.1, ED 99.3/AC 62.8 ng dsDNA/1 mg). The highest type II collagen content was found in neo-cartilage after TM compared with TMPG and ED (TM 60%/TMPG 40%/ED 39%). Inter-treatment differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: TM is a highly suitable material for the reconstitution of osseous defects. TM enables excellent bony ingrowth and fast integration. However, combined with autologous periosteum, such a biocomposite failed to promote satisfactory neo-cartilage formation. Cite this article: E. H. Mrosek, H-W. Chung, J. S. Fitzsimmons, S. W. O’Driscoll, G. G. Reinholz, J. C. Schagemann. Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model. Bone Joint J 2016;5:403–411. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0070.R1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5037966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50379662016-10-05 Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model Mrosek, E. H. Chung, H-W. Fitzsimmons, J. S. O’Driscoll, S. W. Reinholz, G. G. Schagemann, J. C. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if a durable bilayer implant composed of trabecular metal with autologous periosteum on top would be suitable to reconstitute large osteochondral defects. This design would allow for secure implant fixation, subsequent integration and remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult sheep were randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 8/group): 1. trabecular metal/periosteal graft (TMPG), 2. trabecular metal (TM), 3. empty defect (ED). Cartilage and bone healing were assessed macroscopically, biochemically (type II collagen, sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) content) and histologically. RESULTS: At 16 weeks post-operatively, histological scores amongst treatment groups were not statistically different (TMPG: overall 12.7, cartilage 8.6, bone 4.1; TM: overall 14.2, cartilage 9.5, bone 4.9; ED: overall 13.6, cartilage 9.1, bone 4.5). Metal scaffolds were incorporated into the surrounding bone, both in TM and TMPG. The sGAG yield was lower in the neo-cartilage regions compared with the articular cartilage (AC) controls (TMPG 20.8/AC 39.5, TM 25.6/AC 33.3, ED 32.2/AC 40.2 µg sGAG/1 mg respectively), with statistical significance being achieved for the TMPG group (p < 0.05). Hypercellularity of the neo-cartilage was found in TM and ED, as the dsDNA content was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared with contralateral AC controls (TM 126.7/AC 71.1, ED 99.3/AC 62.8 ng dsDNA/1 mg). The highest type II collagen content was found in neo-cartilage after TM compared with TMPG and ED (TM 60%/TMPG 40%/ED 39%). Inter-treatment differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: TM is a highly suitable material for the reconstitution of osseous defects. TM enables excellent bony ingrowth and fast integration. However, combined with autologous periosteum, such a biocomposite failed to promote satisfactory neo-cartilage formation. Cite this article: E. H. Mrosek, H-W. Chung, J. S. Fitzsimmons, S. W. O’Driscoll, G. G. Reinholz, J. C. Schagemann. Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model. Bone Joint J 2016;5:403–411. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0070.R1. 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5037966/ /pubmed/27660334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0070.R1 Text en © 2016 Mayo Foundation for Education and Research. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Mrosek, E. H.
Chung, H-W.
Fitzsimmons, J. S.
O’Driscoll, S. W.
Reinholz, G. G.
Schagemann, J. C.
Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model
title Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model
title_full Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model
title_fullStr Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model
title_full_unstemmed Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model
title_short Porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: A follow-up study in a sheep model
title_sort porous tantalum biocomposites for osteochondral defect repair: a follow-up study in a sheep model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0070.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT mrosekeh poroustantalumbiocompositesforosteochondraldefectrepairafollowupstudyinasheepmodel
AT chunghw poroustantalumbiocompositesforosteochondraldefectrepairafollowupstudyinasheepmodel
AT fitzsimmonsjs poroustantalumbiocompositesforosteochondraldefectrepairafollowupstudyinasheepmodel
AT odriscollsw poroustantalumbiocompositesforosteochondraldefectrepairafollowupstudyinasheepmodel
AT reinholzgg poroustantalumbiocompositesforosteochondraldefectrepairafollowupstudyinasheepmodel
AT schagemannjc poroustantalumbiocompositesforosteochondraldefectrepairafollowupstudyinasheepmodel