Cargando…

Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis

BACKGROUND: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for a wide spectrum of nosocomial and community associated infections worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze MRSA strains from the general population in Canton Sarajevo, B&H. METHODS: Our investigation includi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebic, Velma, Budimir, Ana, Aljicevic, Mufida, Bektas, Sabaheta, Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic, Rebic, Damir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708486
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.248-252
_version_ 1782455870826741760
author Rebic, Velma
Budimir, Ana
Aljicevic, Mufida
Bektas, Sabaheta
Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic
Rebic, Damir
author_facet Rebic, Velma
Budimir, Ana
Aljicevic, Mufida
Bektas, Sabaheta
Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic
Rebic, Damir
author_sort Rebic, Velma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for a wide spectrum of nosocomial and community associated infections worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze MRSA strains from the general population in Canton Sarajevo, B&H. METHODS: Our investigation including either phenotypic and genotypic markers such as antimicrobial resistance, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), SCC typing, and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) detection. RESULTS: Antimicrobial susceptibility: all MRSA isolates were resistant to the β-lactam antibiotics tested, and all isolates were susceptible trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole, rifampicin, fusidic acid, linezolid and vancomycin. Sixty-eight per cent of the MRSA isolates were resistant to erythromycin, 5% to clindamycin, 5% to gentamicin and 4% to ciprofloxacin. After the PFGE analysis, the isolates were grouped into five similarity groups: A-E. The largest number of isolates belonged to one of two groups: C: 60 (60%) and D: 27 (27%). In both groups C and D, SCCmec type IV was predominant (60% and 88, 8%, respectively). A total of 24% of the isolates had positive expression of PVL genes, while 76% showed a statistically significantly greater negative expression of PVL genes. CONCLUSION: SCCmec type IV, together with the susceptibility profile and PFGE grouping, is considered to be typical of CA-MRSA
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5038174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50381742016-10-05 Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis Rebic, Velma Budimir, Ana Aljicevic, Mufida Bektas, Sabaheta Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic Rebic, Damir Acta Inform Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for a wide spectrum of nosocomial and community associated infections worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze MRSA strains from the general population in Canton Sarajevo, B&H. METHODS: Our investigation including either phenotypic and genotypic markers such as antimicrobial resistance, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), SCC typing, and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) detection. RESULTS: Antimicrobial susceptibility: all MRSA isolates were resistant to the β-lactam antibiotics tested, and all isolates were susceptible trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole, rifampicin, fusidic acid, linezolid and vancomycin. Sixty-eight per cent of the MRSA isolates were resistant to erythromycin, 5% to clindamycin, 5% to gentamicin and 4% to ciprofloxacin. After the PFGE analysis, the isolates were grouped into five similarity groups: A-E. The largest number of isolates belonged to one of two groups: C: 60 (60%) and D: 27 (27%). In both groups C and D, SCCmec type IV was predominant (60% and 88, 8%, respectively). A total of 24% of the isolates had positive expression of PVL genes, while 76% showed a statistically significantly greater negative expression of PVL genes. CONCLUSION: SCCmec type IV, together with the susceptibility profile and PFGE grouping, is considered to be typical of CA-MRSA AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-07-16 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5038174/ /pubmed/27708486 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.248-252 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Velma Rebic, Ana Budimir, Mufida Aljicevic, Sabaheta Bektas, Sabina Mahmutovic Vranic, and Damir Rebic http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rebic, Velma
Budimir, Ana
Aljicevic, Mufida
Bektas, Sabaheta
Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic
Rebic, Damir
Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis
title Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis
title_full Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis
title_fullStr Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis
title_full_unstemmed Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis
title_short Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis
title_sort typing of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus using dna fingerprints by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708486
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.248-252
work_keys_str_mv AT rebicvelma typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT budimirana typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT aljicevicmufida typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT bektassabaheta typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT vranicsabinamahmutovic typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT rebicdamir typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis