Cargando…
Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis
BACKGROUND: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for a wide spectrum of nosocomial and community associated infections worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze MRSA strains from the general population in Canton Sarajevo, B&H. METHODS: Our investigation includi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708486 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.248-252 |
_version_ | 1782455870826741760 |
---|---|
author | Rebic, Velma Budimir, Ana Aljicevic, Mufida Bektas, Sabaheta Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic Rebic, Damir |
author_facet | Rebic, Velma Budimir, Ana Aljicevic, Mufida Bektas, Sabaheta Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic Rebic, Damir |
author_sort | Rebic, Velma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for a wide spectrum of nosocomial and community associated infections worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze MRSA strains from the general population in Canton Sarajevo, B&H. METHODS: Our investigation including either phenotypic and genotypic markers such as antimicrobial resistance, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), SCC typing, and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) detection. RESULTS: Antimicrobial susceptibility: all MRSA isolates were resistant to the β-lactam antibiotics tested, and all isolates were susceptible trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole, rifampicin, fusidic acid, linezolid and vancomycin. Sixty-eight per cent of the MRSA isolates were resistant to erythromycin, 5% to clindamycin, 5% to gentamicin and 4% to ciprofloxacin. After the PFGE analysis, the isolates were grouped into five similarity groups: A-E. The largest number of isolates belonged to one of two groups: C: 60 (60%) and D: 27 (27%). In both groups C and D, SCCmec type IV was predominant (60% and 88, 8%, respectively). A total of 24% of the isolates had positive expression of PVL genes, while 76% showed a statistically significantly greater negative expression of PVL genes. CONCLUSION: SCCmec type IV, together with the susceptibility profile and PFGE grouping, is considered to be typical of CA-MRSA |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5038174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50381742016-10-05 Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis Rebic, Velma Budimir, Ana Aljicevic, Mufida Bektas, Sabaheta Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic Rebic, Damir Acta Inform Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for a wide spectrum of nosocomial and community associated infections worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze MRSA strains from the general population in Canton Sarajevo, B&H. METHODS: Our investigation including either phenotypic and genotypic markers such as antimicrobial resistance, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), SCC typing, and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) detection. RESULTS: Antimicrobial susceptibility: all MRSA isolates were resistant to the β-lactam antibiotics tested, and all isolates were susceptible trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole, rifampicin, fusidic acid, linezolid and vancomycin. Sixty-eight per cent of the MRSA isolates were resistant to erythromycin, 5% to clindamycin, 5% to gentamicin and 4% to ciprofloxacin. After the PFGE analysis, the isolates were grouped into five similarity groups: A-E. The largest number of isolates belonged to one of two groups: C: 60 (60%) and D: 27 (27%). In both groups C and D, SCCmec type IV was predominant (60% and 88, 8%, respectively). A total of 24% of the isolates had positive expression of PVL genes, while 76% showed a statistically significantly greater negative expression of PVL genes. CONCLUSION: SCCmec type IV, together with the susceptibility profile and PFGE grouping, is considered to be typical of CA-MRSA AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-07-16 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5038174/ /pubmed/27708486 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.248-252 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Velma Rebic, Ana Budimir, Mufida Aljicevic, Sabaheta Bektas, Sabina Mahmutovic Vranic, and Damir Rebic http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Rebic, Velma Budimir, Ana Aljicevic, Mufida Bektas, Sabaheta Vranic, Sabina Mahmutovic Rebic, Damir Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis |
title | Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis |
title_full | Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis |
title_fullStr | Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis |
title_full_unstemmed | Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis |
title_short | Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Using DNA Fingerprints by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis |
title_sort | typing of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus using dna fingerprints by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708486 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.248-252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rebicvelma typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis AT budimirana typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis AT aljicevicmufida typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis AT bektassabaheta typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis AT vranicsabinamahmutovic typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis AT rebicdamir typingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureususingdnafingerprintsbypulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis |