Cargando…

Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ

The present is a retrospective study examining the use of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) for guiding breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). A total of 142 patients with pathologically confirmed DCIS were initially included in the study. The patients underwent preoper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Anqian, Zhu, Luoxi, Tan, Yanjuan, Liu, Jian, Xiang, Jingjing, Zhu, Qingqing, Bao, Lingyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27698816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4924
_version_ 1782455880319500288
author Huang, Anqian
Zhu, Luoxi
Tan, Yanjuan
Liu, Jian
Xiang, Jingjing
Zhu, Qingqing
Bao, Lingyun
author_facet Huang, Anqian
Zhu, Luoxi
Tan, Yanjuan
Liu, Jian
Xiang, Jingjing
Zhu, Qingqing
Bao, Lingyun
author_sort Huang, Anqian
collection PubMed
description The present is a retrospective study examining the use of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) for guiding breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). A total of 142 patients with pathologically confirmed DCIS were initially included in the study. The patients underwent preoperative examination by conventional ultrasound and by ABVS. The BI-RADS category system was used to identify benign and malignant lesions, after which breast conservation surgery was performed, and the therapeutic effects were compared. DCIS lesions were found in each quadrant of the breasts. Typical symptoms included: Duct ectasia and filling in 23 cases, mass (mainly solid, occasionally cystic, with or without calcification) in 38 cases, hypoechoic area (with or without calcification) in 33 cases, calcifications (simple) in 23 cases, and architectural distortion in 17 cases. In addition, 110 cases (82.1%) were detected as grade ≥4 according to the BI-RADS category, and 92 cases (68.7%) were considered malignant lesions following conventional ultrasound scanning. The detection rate of ABVS was significantly higher than that of conventional ultrasound (χ(2)=268.000, P<0.001). The average tumor diameter was 2.5±0.8 cm using ABVS and 2.0±0.9 cm using conventional ultrasound (the former being significantly higher than the latter; t=6.325, P=0.034). Eight patients (5.6%) had recurrences of the cancer, and the tumor diameter in the 8 patients was significantly larger using ABVS as compared to conventional ultrasound. In the diagnosis of DCIS, ABVS was superior to conventional ultrasound scanner in guiding breast conservation surgery and predicting recurrence. However, large-scale studies are required for confirmation of the findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5038336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50383362016-10-03 Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ Huang, Anqian Zhu, Luoxi Tan, Yanjuan Liu, Jian Xiang, Jingjing Zhu, Qingqing Bao, Lingyun Oncol Lett Articles The present is a retrospective study examining the use of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) for guiding breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). A total of 142 patients with pathologically confirmed DCIS were initially included in the study. The patients underwent preoperative examination by conventional ultrasound and by ABVS. The BI-RADS category system was used to identify benign and malignant lesions, after which breast conservation surgery was performed, and the therapeutic effects were compared. DCIS lesions were found in each quadrant of the breasts. Typical symptoms included: Duct ectasia and filling in 23 cases, mass (mainly solid, occasionally cystic, with or without calcification) in 38 cases, hypoechoic area (with or without calcification) in 33 cases, calcifications (simple) in 23 cases, and architectural distortion in 17 cases. In addition, 110 cases (82.1%) were detected as grade ≥4 according to the BI-RADS category, and 92 cases (68.7%) were considered malignant lesions following conventional ultrasound scanning. The detection rate of ABVS was significantly higher than that of conventional ultrasound (χ(2)=268.000, P<0.001). The average tumor diameter was 2.5±0.8 cm using ABVS and 2.0±0.9 cm using conventional ultrasound (the former being significantly higher than the latter; t=6.325, P=0.034). Eight patients (5.6%) had recurrences of the cancer, and the tumor diameter in the 8 patients was significantly larger using ABVS as compared to conventional ultrasound. In the diagnosis of DCIS, ABVS was superior to conventional ultrasound scanner in guiding breast conservation surgery and predicting recurrence. However, large-scale studies are required for confirmation of the findings. D.A. Spandidos 2016-10 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5038336/ /pubmed/27698816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4924 Text en Copyright: © Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Huang, Anqian
Zhu, Luoxi
Tan, Yanjuan
Liu, Jian
Xiang, Jingjing
Zhu, Qingqing
Bao, Lingyun
Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ
title Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ
title_full Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ
title_fullStr Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ
title_short Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ
title_sort evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27698816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4924
work_keys_str_mv AT huanganqian evaluationofautomatedbreastvolumescannerforbreastconservationsurgeryinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT zhuluoxi evaluationofautomatedbreastvolumescannerforbreastconservationsurgeryinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT tanyanjuan evaluationofautomatedbreastvolumescannerforbreastconservationsurgeryinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT liujian evaluationofautomatedbreastvolumescannerforbreastconservationsurgeryinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT xiangjingjing evaluationofautomatedbreastvolumescannerforbreastconservationsurgeryinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT zhuqingqing evaluationofautomatedbreastvolumescannerforbreastconservationsurgeryinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT baolingyun evaluationofautomatedbreastvolumescannerforbreastconservationsurgeryinductalcarcinomainsitu