Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis
BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are significant indications for antibiotic treatment. Daptomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been registered and licensed to be used in the treatment of these infections. However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The objective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703367 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115175 |
_version_ | 1782455910080184320 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Chao Mao, Zhi Yang, Mengmeng Kang, Hongjun Liu, Hui Pan, Liang Hu, Jie Luo, Jun Zhou, Feihu |
author_facet | Liu, Chao Mao, Zhi Yang, Mengmeng Kang, Hongjun Liu, Hui Pan, Liang Hu, Jie Luo, Jun Zhou, Feihu |
author_sort | Liu, Chao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are significant indications for antibiotic treatment. Daptomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been registered and licensed to be used in the treatment of these infections. However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daptomycin for the treatment of SSTIs and to analyze whether the available sample size has been large enough and is conclusive. METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared daptomycin with other antibiotics in adult patients with SSTIs up to February 2016. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (n=2,002). There was no difference in either the clinical success rate (intention-to-treat population: relative risk [RR] =1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.99–1.10, P=0.12; clinically evaluable population: RR =1.00, 95% CI =0.97–1.04, P=0.82) or the microbiological success rate (RR =1.00, 95% CI =0.95–1.06, P=0.92) between the daptomycin and comparator groups for treating SSTIs, which was confirmed by TSA. Compared with vancomycin, daptomycin exhibited no advantage in increasing the clinical success rate (RR =1.03, 95% CI =0.95–1.13, P=0.47), and this was also confirmed by TSA. All-cause mortality, overall treatment-related adverse events, and creatine phosphokinase events were similar between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Daptomycin and comparator drugs are equally efficacious with regard to clinical and microbiological success for patients with SSTIs, and TSA showed that no additional randomized controlled trials are required. Although daptomycin is a good alternative when other antibiotics are contraindicated for patients with SSTIs and it can serve as a first-line treatment for SSTIs, clinicians should be aware of potential adverse events, such as daptomycin-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia and creatine phosphokinase, when treating patients with daptomycin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5038576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50385762016-10-04 Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis Liu, Chao Mao, Zhi Yang, Mengmeng Kang, Hongjun Liu, Hui Pan, Liang Hu, Jie Luo, Jun Zhou, Feihu Ther Clin Risk Manag Review BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are significant indications for antibiotic treatment. Daptomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been registered and licensed to be used in the treatment of these infections. However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daptomycin for the treatment of SSTIs and to analyze whether the available sample size has been large enough and is conclusive. METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared daptomycin with other antibiotics in adult patients with SSTIs up to February 2016. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (n=2,002). There was no difference in either the clinical success rate (intention-to-treat population: relative risk [RR] =1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.99–1.10, P=0.12; clinically evaluable population: RR =1.00, 95% CI =0.97–1.04, P=0.82) or the microbiological success rate (RR =1.00, 95% CI =0.95–1.06, P=0.92) between the daptomycin and comparator groups for treating SSTIs, which was confirmed by TSA. Compared with vancomycin, daptomycin exhibited no advantage in increasing the clinical success rate (RR =1.03, 95% CI =0.95–1.13, P=0.47), and this was also confirmed by TSA. All-cause mortality, overall treatment-related adverse events, and creatine phosphokinase events were similar between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Daptomycin and comparator drugs are equally efficacious with regard to clinical and microbiological success for patients with SSTIs, and TSA showed that no additional randomized controlled trials are required. Although daptomycin is a good alternative when other antibiotics are contraindicated for patients with SSTIs and it can serve as a first-line treatment for SSTIs, clinicians should be aware of potential adverse events, such as daptomycin-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia and creatine phosphokinase, when treating patients with daptomycin. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5038576/ /pubmed/27703367 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115175 Text en © 2016 Liu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Liu, Chao Mao, Zhi Yang, Mengmeng Kang, Hongjun Liu, Hui Pan, Liang Hu, Jie Luo, Jun Zhou, Feihu Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703367 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuchao efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis AT maozhi efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis AT yangmengmeng efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis AT kanghongjun efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liuhui efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis AT panliang efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis AT hujie efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis AT luojun efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis AT zhoufeihu efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis |