Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are significant indications for antibiotic treatment. Daptomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been registered and licensed to be used in the treatment of these infections. However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chao, Mao, Zhi, Yang, Mengmeng, Kang, Hongjun, Liu, Hui, Pan, Liang, Hu, Jie, Luo, Jun, Zhou, Feihu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703367
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115175
_version_ 1782455910080184320
author Liu, Chao
Mao, Zhi
Yang, Mengmeng
Kang, Hongjun
Liu, Hui
Pan, Liang
Hu, Jie
Luo, Jun
Zhou, Feihu
author_facet Liu, Chao
Mao, Zhi
Yang, Mengmeng
Kang, Hongjun
Liu, Hui
Pan, Liang
Hu, Jie
Luo, Jun
Zhou, Feihu
author_sort Liu, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are significant indications for antibiotic treatment. Daptomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been registered and licensed to be used in the treatment of these infections. However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daptomycin for the treatment of SSTIs and to analyze whether the available sample size has been large enough and is conclusive. METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared daptomycin with other antibiotics in adult patients with SSTIs up to February 2016. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (n=2,002). There was no difference in either the clinical success rate (intention-to-treat population: relative risk [RR] =1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.99–1.10, P=0.12; clinically evaluable population: RR =1.00, 95% CI =0.97–1.04, P=0.82) or the microbiological success rate (RR =1.00, 95% CI =0.95–1.06, P=0.92) between the daptomycin and comparator groups for treating SSTIs, which was confirmed by TSA. Compared with vancomycin, daptomycin exhibited no advantage in increasing the clinical success rate (RR =1.03, 95% CI =0.95–1.13, P=0.47), and this was also confirmed by TSA. All-cause mortality, overall treatment-related adverse events, and creatine phosphokinase events were similar between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Daptomycin and comparator drugs are equally efficacious with regard to clinical and microbiological success for patients with SSTIs, and TSA showed that no additional randomized controlled trials are required. Although daptomycin is a good alternative when other antibiotics are contraindicated for patients with SSTIs and it can serve as a first-line treatment for SSTIs, clinicians should be aware of potential adverse events, such as daptomycin-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia and creatine phosphokinase, when treating patients with daptomycin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5038576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50385762016-10-04 Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis Liu, Chao Mao, Zhi Yang, Mengmeng Kang, Hongjun Liu, Hui Pan, Liang Hu, Jie Luo, Jun Zhou, Feihu Ther Clin Risk Manag Review BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are significant indications for antibiotic treatment. Daptomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been registered and licensed to be used in the treatment of these infections. However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daptomycin for the treatment of SSTIs and to analyze whether the available sample size has been large enough and is conclusive. METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared daptomycin with other antibiotics in adult patients with SSTIs up to February 2016. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (n=2,002). There was no difference in either the clinical success rate (intention-to-treat population: relative risk [RR] =1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.99–1.10, P=0.12; clinically evaluable population: RR =1.00, 95% CI =0.97–1.04, P=0.82) or the microbiological success rate (RR =1.00, 95% CI =0.95–1.06, P=0.92) between the daptomycin and comparator groups for treating SSTIs, which was confirmed by TSA. Compared with vancomycin, daptomycin exhibited no advantage in increasing the clinical success rate (RR =1.03, 95% CI =0.95–1.13, P=0.47), and this was also confirmed by TSA. All-cause mortality, overall treatment-related adverse events, and creatine phosphokinase events were similar between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Daptomycin and comparator drugs are equally efficacious with regard to clinical and microbiological success for patients with SSTIs, and TSA showed that no additional randomized controlled trials are required. Although daptomycin is a good alternative when other antibiotics are contraindicated for patients with SSTIs and it can serve as a first-line treatment for SSTIs, clinicians should be aware of potential adverse events, such as daptomycin-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia and creatine phosphokinase, when treating patients with daptomycin. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5038576/ /pubmed/27703367 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115175 Text en © 2016 Liu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Liu, Chao
Mao, Zhi
Yang, Mengmeng
Kang, Hongjun
Liu, Hui
Pan, Liang
Hu, Jie
Luo, Jun
Zhou, Feihu
Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis
title Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703367
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115175
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchao efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT maozhi efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yangmengmeng efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT kanghongjun efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT liuhui efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT panliang efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT hujie efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT luojun efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT zhoufeihu efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinforskinandsofttissueinfectionsasystematicreviewwithtrialsequentialanalysis