Cargando…
An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model
BACKGROUND: The Decision-Making Capacity Assessment (DMCA) Model includes a best-practice process and tools to assess DMCA, and implementation strategies at the organizational and assessor levels to support provision of DMCAs across the care continuum. A Developmental Evaluation of the DMCA Model wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Canadian Geriatrics Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729947 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.19.222 |
_version_ | 1782455973880791040 |
---|---|
author | Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C. Parmar, Jasneet Friesen, Steven Rogers, Laura G. Pike, Ashley Sluggett, Bryan |
author_facet | Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C. Parmar, Jasneet Friesen, Steven Rogers, Laura G. Pike, Ashley Sluggett, Bryan |
author_sort | Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Decision-Making Capacity Assessment (DMCA) Model includes a best-practice process and tools to assess DMCA, and implementation strategies at the organizational and assessor levels to support provision of DMCAs across the care continuum. A Developmental Evaluation of the DMCA Model was conducted. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used. Survey (N = 126) and focus group (N = 49) data were collected from practitioners utilizing the Model. RESULTS: Strengths of the Model include its best-practice and implementation approach, applicability to independent practitioners and inter-professional teams, focus on training/mentoring to enhance knowledge/skills, and provision of tools/processes. Post-training, participants agreed that they followed the Model’s guiding principles (90%), used problem-solving (92%), understood discipline-specific roles (87%), were confident in their knowledge of DMCAs (75%) and pertinent legislation (72%), accessed consultative services (88%), and received management support (64%). Model implementation is impeded when role clarity, physician engagement, inter-professional buy-in, accountability, dedicated resources, information sharing systems, and remuneration are lacking. Dedicated resources, job descriptions inclusive of DMCAs, ongoing education/mentoring supports, access to consultative services, and appropriate remuneration would support implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The DMCA Model offers practitioners, inter-professional teams, and organizations a best-practice and implementation approach to DMCAs. Addressing barriers and further contextualizing the Model would be warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5038930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Canadian Geriatrics Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50389302016-10-11 An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C. Parmar, Jasneet Friesen, Steven Rogers, Laura G. Pike, Ashley Sluggett, Bryan Can Geriatr J Original Research BACKGROUND: The Decision-Making Capacity Assessment (DMCA) Model includes a best-practice process and tools to assess DMCA, and implementation strategies at the organizational and assessor levels to support provision of DMCAs across the care continuum. A Developmental Evaluation of the DMCA Model was conducted. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used. Survey (N = 126) and focus group (N = 49) data were collected from practitioners utilizing the Model. RESULTS: Strengths of the Model include its best-practice and implementation approach, applicability to independent practitioners and inter-professional teams, focus on training/mentoring to enhance knowledge/skills, and provision of tools/processes. Post-training, participants agreed that they followed the Model’s guiding principles (90%), used problem-solving (92%), understood discipline-specific roles (87%), were confident in their knowledge of DMCAs (75%) and pertinent legislation (72%), accessed consultative services (88%), and received management support (64%). Model implementation is impeded when role clarity, physician engagement, inter-professional buy-in, accountability, dedicated resources, information sharing systems, and remuneration are lacking. Dedicated resources, job descriptions inclusive of DMCAs, ongoing education/mentoring supports, access to consultative services, and appropriate remuneration would support implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The DMCA Model offers practitioners, inter-professional teams, and organizations a best-practice and implementation approach to DMCAs. Addressing barriers and further contextualizing the Model would be warranted. Canadian Geriatrics Society 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5038930/ /pubmed/27729947 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.19.222 Text en © 2016 Author(s). Published by the Canadian Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C. Parmar, Jasneet Friesen, Steven Rogers, Laura G. Pike, Ashley Sluggett, Bryan An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model |
title | An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model |
title_full | An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model |
title_short | An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model |
title_sort | evaluation of the decision-making capacity assessment model |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729947 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.19.222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bremaultphillipssuzettec anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT parmarjasneet anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT friesensteven anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT rogerslaurag anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT pikeashley anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT sluggettbryan anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT bremaultphillipssuzettec evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT parmarjasneet evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT friesensteven evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT rogerslaurag evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT pikeashley evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel AT sluggettbryan evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel |