Cargando…

An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model

BACKGROUND: The Decision-Making Capacity Assessment (DMCA) Model includes a best-practice process and tools to assess DMCA, and implementation strategies at the organizational and assessor levels to support provision of DMCAs across the care continuum. A Developmental Evaluation of the DMCA Model wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C., Parmar, Jasneet, Friesen, Steven, Rogers, Laura G., Pike, Ashley, Sluggett, Bryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Geriatrics Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729947
http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.19.222
_version_ 1782455973880791040
author Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C.
Parmar, Jasneet
Friesen, Steven
Rogers, Laura G.
Pike, Ashley
Sluggett, Bryan
author_facet Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C.
Parmar, Jasneet
Friesen, Steven
Rogers, Laura G.
Pike, Ashley
Sluggett, Bryan
author_sort Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Decision-Making Capacity Assessment (DMCA) Model includes a best-practice process and tools to assess DMCA, and implementation strategies at the organizational and assessor levels to support provision of DMCAs across the care continuum. A Developmental Evaluation of the DMCA Model was conducted. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used. Survey (N = 126) and focus group (N = 49) data were collected from practitioners utilizing the Model. RESULTS: Strengths of the Model include its best-practice and implementation approach, applicability to independent practitioners and inter-professional teams, focus on training/mentoring to enhance knowledge/skills, and provision of tools/processes. Post-training, participants agreed that they followed the Model’s guiding principles (90%), used problem-solving (92%), understood discipline-specific roles (87%), were confident in their knowledge of DMCAs (75%) and pertinent legislation (72%), accessed consultative services (88%), and received management support (64%). Model implementation is impeded when role clarity, physician engagement, inter-professional buy-in, accountability, dedicated resources, information sharing systems, and remuneration are lacking. Dedicated resources, job descriptions inclusive of DMCAs, ongoing education/mentoring supports, access to consultative services, and appropriate remuneration would support implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The DMCA Model offers practitioners, inter-professional teams, and organizations a best-practice and implementation approach to DMCAs. Addressing barriers and further contextualizing the Model would be warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5038930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Canadian Geriatrics Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50389302016-10-11 An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C. Parmar, Jasneet Friesen, Steven Rogers, Laura G. Pike, Ashley Sluggett, Bryan Can Geriatr J Original Research BACKGROUND: The Decision-Making Capacity Assessment (DMCA) Model includes a best-practice process and tools to assess DMCA, and implementation strategies at the organizational and assessor levels to support provision of DMCAs across the care continuum. A Developmental Evaluation of the DMCA Model was conducted. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used. Survey (N = 126) and focus group (N = 49) data were collected from practitioners utilizing the Model. RESULTS: Strengths of the Model include its best-practice and implementation approach, applicability to independent practitioners and inter-professional teams, focus on training/mentoring to enhance knowledge/skills, and provision of tools/processes. Post-training, participants agreed that they followed the Model’s guiding principles (90%), used problem-solving (92%), understood discipline-specific roles (87%), were confident in their knowledge of DMCAs (75%) and pertinent legislation (72%), accessed consultative services (88%), and received management support (64%). Model implementation is impeded when role clarity, physician engagement, inter-professional buy-in, accountability, dedicated resources, information sharing systems, and remuneration are lacking. Dedicated resources, job descriptions inclusive of DMCAs, ongoing education/mentoring supports, access to consultative services, and appropriate remuneration would support implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The DMCA Model offers practitioners, inter-professional teams, and organizations a best-practice and implementation approach to DMCAs. Addressing barriers and further contextualizing the Model would be warranted. Canadian Geriatrics Society 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5038930/ /pubmed/27729947 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.19.222 Text en © 2016 Author(s). Published by the Canadian Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Brémault-Phillips, Suzette C.
Parmar, Jasneet
Friesen, Steven
Rogers, Laura G.
Pike, Ashley
Sluggett, Bryan
An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model
title An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model
title_full An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model
title_short An Evaluation of the Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model
title_sort evaluation of the decision-making capacity assessment model
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729947
http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.19.222
work_keys_str_mv AT bremaultphillipssuzettec anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT parmarjasneet anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT friesensteven anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT rogerslaurag anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT pikeashley anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT sluggettbryan anevaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT bremaultphillipssuzettec evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT parmarjasneet evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT friesensteven evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT rogerslaurag evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT pikeashley evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel
AT sluggettbryan evaluationofthedecisionmakingcapacityassessmentmodel