Cargando…

Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS

BACKGROUND: In the majority of pediatric patients, the hemolytic–uremic syndrome (HUS) is caused by an infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), mostly serotype O157. It is important to discriminate between HUS caused by STEC and complement-mediated HUS (atypical HUS) due to diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijnsma, Kioa L., van Bommel, Sheila A. M., van der Velden, Thea, Volokhina, Elena, Schreuder, Michiel F., van den Heuvel, Lambertus P., van de Kar, Nicole C. A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27240858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3420-7
_version_ 1782456012167446528
author Wijnsma, Kioa L.
van Bommel, Sheila A. M.
van der Velden, Thea
Volokhina, Elena
Schreuder, Michiel F.
van den Heuvel, Lambertus P.
van de Kar, Nicole C. A. J.
author_facet Wijnsma, Kioa L.
van Bommel, Sheila A. M.
van der Velden, Thea
Volokhina, Elena
Schreuder, Michiel F.
van den Heuvel, Lambertus P.
van de Kar, Nicole C. A. J.
author_sort Wijnsma, Kioa L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the majority of pediatric patients, the hemolytic–uremic syndrome (HUS) is caused by an infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), mostly serotype O157. It is important to discriminate between HUS caused by STEC and complement-mediated HUS (atypical HUS) due to differences in treatment and outcome. As STEC and its toxins can only be detected in the patient’s stool for a short period of time after disease onset, the infectious agent may go undetected using only fecal diagnostic tests. Serum antibodies to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of STEC persist for several weeks and may therefore be of added value in the diagnosis of STEC. METHODS: All patients with clinical STEC-HUS who were treated at Radboud University Medical Center between 1990 and 2014 were included in this retrospective single-center study. Clinical and diagnostic microbiological data were collected. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies against LPS of STEC serotype O157 were detected by a serological assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Data from 65 patients weres available for analysis. Fecal diagnostic testing found evidence of an STEC infection in 34/63 patients (54 %). Serological evidence of STEC O157 was obtained in an additional 16 patients. This is an added value of 23 % (p < 0.0001) when the serological antibody assay is used in addition to standard fecal diagnostic tests to confirm the diagnosis STEC-HUS. This added value becomes especially apparent when the tests are performed more than 7 days after the initial manifestation of the gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The serological anti-O157 LPS assay clearly makes a positive contribution when used in combination with standard fecal diagnostic tests to diagnose STEC-HUS and should be incorporated in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5039220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50392202016-10-11 Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS Wijnsma, Kioa L. van Bommel, Sheila A. M. van der Velden, Thea Volokhina, Elena Schreuder, Michiel F. van den Heuvel, Lambertus P. van de Kar, Nicole C. A. J. Pediatr Nephrol Original Article BACKGROUND: In the majority of pediatric patients, the hemolytic–uremic syndrome (HUS) is caused by an infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), mostly serotype O157. It is important to discriminate between HUS caused by STEC and complement-mediated HUS (atypical HUS) due to differences in treatment and outcome. As STEC and its toxins can only be detected in the patient’s stool for a short period of time after disease onset, the infectious agent may go undetected using only fecal diagnostic tests. Serum antibodies to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of STEC persist for several weeks and may therefore be of added value in the diagnosis of STEC. METHODS: All patients with clinical STEC-HUS who were treated at Radboud University Medical Center between 1990 and 2014 were included in this retrospective single-center study. Clinical and diagnostic microbiological data were collected. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies against LPS of STEC serotype O157 were detected by a serological assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Data from 65 patients weres available for analysis. Fecal diagnostic testing found evidence of an STEC infection in 34/63 patients (54 %). Serological evidence of STEC O157 was obtained in an additional 16 patients. This is an added value of 23 % (p < 0.0001) when the serological antibody assay is used in addition to standard fecal diagnostic tests to confirm the diagnosis STEC-HUS. This added value becomes especially apparent when the tests are performed more than 7 days after the initial manifestation of the gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The serological anti-O157 LPS assay clearly makes a positive contribution when used in combination with standard fecal diagnostic tests to diagnose STEC-HUS and should be incorporated in clinical practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-05-30 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5039220/ /pubmed/27240858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3420-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wijnsma, Kioa L.
van Bommel, Sheila A. M.
van der Velden, Thea
Volokhina, Elena
Schreuder, Michiel F.
van den Heuvel, Lambertus P.
van de Kar, Nicole C. A. J.
Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS
title Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS
title_full Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS
title_fullStr Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS
title_full_unstemmed Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS
title_short Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS
title_sort fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish stec-hus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27240858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3420-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wijnsmakioal fecaldiagnosticsincombinationwithserologybesttesttoestablishstechus
AT vanbommelsheilaam fecaldiagnosticsincombinationwithserologybesttesttoestablishstechus
AT vanderveldenthea fecaldiagnosticsincombinationwithserologybesttesttoestablishstechus
AT volokhinaelena fecaldiagnosticsincombinationwithserologybesttesttoestablishstechus
AT schreudermichielf fecaldiagnosticsincombinationwithserologybesttesttoestablishstechus
AT vandenheuvellambertusp fecaldiagnosticsincombinationwithserologybesttesttoestablishstechus
AT vandekarnicolecaj fecaldiagnosticsincombinationwithserologybesttesttoestablishstechus