Cargando…

Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry

OBJECTIVES: To identify the intranasal (IN) sedatives used to achieve conscious sedation during dental procedures amongst children. METHODS: A literature review was conducted by identifying relevant studies through searches on Medline. Search included IN of midazolam, ketamine, sufentanil, dexmedeto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: AlSarheed, Maha A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570849
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.9.15003
_version_ 1782456094996561920
author AlSarheed, Maha A.
author_facet AlSarheed, Maha A.
author_sort AlSarheed, Maha A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify the intranasal (IN) sedatives used to achieve conscious sedation during dental procedures amongst children. METHODS: A literature review was conducted by identifying relevant studies through searches on Medline. Search included IN of midazolam, ketamine, sufentanil, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, haloperidol and loranzepam. Studies included were conducted amongst individuals below 18 years, published in English, and were not restricted by year. Exclusion criteria were articles that did not focus on pediatric dentistry. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. The most commonly used sedatives were midazolam, followed by ketamine and sufentanil. Onset of action for IN midazolam was 5-15 minutes (min), however, IN ketamine was faster (mean 5.74 min), while both IN sufentanil (mean 20 min) and IN dexmedetomidine (mean 25 min) were slow in comparison. Midazolam was effective for modifying behavior in mild to moderately anxious children, however, for more invasive or prolonged procedures, stronger sedatives, such as IN ketamine, IN sufentanil were recommended. In addition, ketamine fared better in overall success rate (89%) when compared with IN midazolam (69%). Intranasal dexmedetomidine was only used as pre-medication amongst children. While its’ onset of action is longer when compared with IN midazolam, it produced deeper sedation at the time of separation from the parent and at the time of anesthesia induction. CONCLUSION: Intranasal midazolam, ketamine and sufentanil are effective and safe for conscious sedation, while intranasal midazolam, dexmedetomidine and sufentanil have proven to be effective premedications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5039613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50396132016-10-04 Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry AlSarheed, Maha A. Saudi Med J Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: To identify the intranasal (IN) sedatives used to achieve conscious sedation during dental procedures amongst children. METHODS: A literature review was conducted by identifying relevant studies through searches on Medline. Search included IN of midazolam, ketamine, sufentanil, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, haloperidol and loranzepam. Studies included were conducted amongst individuals below 18 years, published in English, and were not restricted by year. Exclusion criteria were articles that did not focus on pediatric dentistry. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. The most commonly used sedatives were midazolam, followed by ketamine and sufentanil. Onset of action for IN midazolam was 5-15 minutes (min), however, IN ketamine was faster (mean 5.74 min), while both IN sufentanil (mean 20 min) and IN dexmedetomidine (mean 25 min) were slow in comparison. Midazolam was effective for modifying behavior in mild to moderately anxious children, however, for more invasive or prolonged procedures, stronger sedatives, such as IN ketamine, IN sufentanil were recommended. In addition, ketamine fared better in overall success rate (89%) when compared with IN midazolam (69%). Intranasal dexmedetomidine was only used as pre-medication amongst children. While its’ onset of action is longer when compared with IN midazolam, it produced deeper sedation at the time of separation from the parent and at the time of anesthesia induction. CONCLUSION: Intranasal midazolam, ketamine and sufentanil are effective and safe for conscious sedation, while intranasal midazolam, dexmedetomidine and sufentanil have proven to be effective premedications. Saudi Medical Journal 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5039613/ /pubmed/27570849 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.9.15003 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
AlSarheed, Maha A.
Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry
title Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry
title_full Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry
title_fullStr Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry
title_full_unstemmed Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry
title_short Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry
title_sort intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570849
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.9.15003
work_keys_str_mv AT alsarheedmahaa intranasalsedativesinpediatricdentistry