Cargando…

Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST)

BACKGROUND: Studies on time to diagnosis are an increasing field of clinical research that may help to plan corrective actions and identify inequities in access to healthcare. Specific features of time to diagnosis studies, such as how participants were selected and how time to diagnosis was defined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Launay, Elise, Cohen, Jérémie F., Bossuyt, Patrick M., Buekens, Pierre, Deeks, Jonathan, Dye, Timothy, Feltbower, Richard, Ferrari, Andrea, Kramer, Michael, Leeflang, Mariska, Moher, David, Moons, Karel G., von Elm, Erik, Ravaud, Philippe, Chalumeau, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27677259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0690-7
_version_ 1782456152095719424
author Launay, Elise
Cohen, Jérémie F.
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Buekens, Pierre
Deeks, Jonathan
Dye, Timothy
Feltbower, Richard
Ferrari, Andrea
Kramer, Michael
Leeflang, Mariska
Moher, David
Moons, Karel G.
von Elm, Erik
Ravaud, Philippe
Chalumeau, Martin
author_facet Launay, Elise
Cohen, Jérémie F.
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Buekens, Pierre
Deeks, Jonathan
Dye, Timothy
Feltbower, Richard
Ferrari, Andrea
Kramer, Michael
Leeflang, Mariska
Moher, David
Moons, Karel G.
von Elm, Erik
Ravaud, Philippe
Chalumeau, Martin
author_sort Launay, Elise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies on time to diagnosis are an increasing field of clinical research that may help to plan corrective actions and identify inequities in access to healthcare. Specific features of time to diagnosis studies, such as how participants were selected and how time to diagnosis was defined and measured, are poorly reported. The present study aims to derive a reporting guideline for studies on time to diagnosis. METHODS: Each item of a list previously used to evaluate the completeness of reporting of studies on time to diagnosis was independently evaluated by a core panel of international experts (n = 11) for relevance and readability before an open electronic discussion allowed consensus to be reached on a refined list. The list was then submitted with an explanatory document to first, last and/or corresponding authors (n = 98) of published systematic reviews on time to diagnosis (n = 45) for relevance and readability, and finally approved by the core expert panel. RESULTS: The refined reporting guideline consists of a 19-item checklist: six items are about the process of participant selection (with a suggested flowchart), six about the definition and measurement of time to diagnosis, and three about optional analyses of associations between time to diagnosis and participant characteristics and health outcomes. Of 24 responding authors of systematic reviews, more than 21 (≥88 %) rated the items as relevant, and more than 17 (≥70 %) as readable; 19 of 22 (86 %) authors stated that they would potentially use the reporting guideline in the future. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a reporting guideline (REST) that could help authors, reviewers, and editors of time to diagnosis study reports to improve the completeness and the accuracy of their reporting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0690-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5039933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50399332016-10-05 Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST) Launay, Elise Cohen, Jérémie F. Bossuyt, Patrick M. Buekens, Pierre Deeks, Jonathan Dye, Timothy Feltbower, Richard Ferrari, Andrea Kramer, Michael Leeflang, Mariska Moher, David Moons, Karel G. von Elm, Erik Ravaud, Philippe Chalumeau, Martin BMC Med Guideline BACKGROUND: Studies on time to diagnosis are an increasing field of clinical research that may help to plan corrective actions and identify inequities in access to healthcare. Specific features of time to diagnosis studies, such as how participants were selected and how time to diagnosis was defined and measured, are poorly reported. The present study aims to derive a reporting guideline for studies on time to diagnosis. METHODS: Each item of a list previously used to evaluate the completeness of reporting of studies on time to diagnosis was independently evaluated by a core panel of international experts (n = 11) for relevance and readability before an open electronic discussion allowed consensus to be reached on a refined list. The list was then submitted with an explanatory document to first, last and/or corresponding authors (n = 98) of published systematic reviews on time to diagnosis (n = 45) for relevance and readability, and finally approved by the core expert panel. RESULTS: The refined reporting guideline consists of a 19-item checklist: six items are about the process of participant selection (with a suggested flowchart), six about the definition and measurement of time to diagnosis, and three about optional analyses of associations between time to diagnosis and participant characteristics and health outcomes. Of 24 responding authors of systematic reviews, more than 21 (≥88 %) rated the items as relevant, and more than 17 (≥70 %) as readable; 19 of 22 (86 %) authors stated that they would potentially use the reporting guideline in the future. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a reporting guideline (REST) that could help authors, reviewers, and editors of time to diagnosis study reports to improve the completeness and the accuracy of their reporting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0690-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5039933/ /pubmed/27677259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0690-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Guideline
Launay, Elise
Cohen, Jérémie F.
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Buekens, Pierre
Deeks, Jonathan
Dye, Timothy
Feltbower, Richard
Ferrari, Andrea
Kramer, Michael
Leeflang, Mariska
Moher, David
Moons, Karel G.
von Elm, Erik
Ravaud, Philippe
Chalumeau, Martin
Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST)
title Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST)
title_full Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST)
title_fullStr Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST)
title_full_unstemmed Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST)
title_short Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST)
title_sort reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (rest)
topic Guideline
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27677259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0690-7
work_keys_str_mv AT launayelise reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT cohenjeremief reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT bossuytpatrickm reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT buekenspierre reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT deeksjonathan reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT dyetimothy reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT feltbowerrichard reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT ferrariandrea reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT kramermichael reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT leeflangmariska reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT moherdavid reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT moonskarelg reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT vonelmerik reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT ravaudphilippe reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest
AT chalumeaumartin reportingstudiesontimetodiagnosisproposalofaguidelinebyaninternationalpanelrest