Cargando…

“Fast-track” and “Minimally Invasive” Surgery for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols or fast-track (FT) programs enable a shorter hospital stay and lower complication rate. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with a lesser trauma and a quicker recovery in many elective abdominal surgeries. However, little is kno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xin-Xin, Pan, Hua-Feng, Jiang, Zhi-Wei, Zhang, Shu, Wang, Zhi-Ming, Chen, Ping, Zhao, Yan, Wang, Gang, Zhao, Kun, Li, Jie-Shou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27647187
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.190659
_version_ 1782456169706553344
author Liu, Xin-Xin
Pan, Hua-Feng
Jiang, Zhi-Wei
Zhang, Shu
Wang, Zhi-Ming
Chen, Ping
Zhao, Yan
Wang, Gang
Zhao, Kun
Li, Jie-Shou
author_facet Liu, Xin-Xin
Pan, Hua-Feng
Jiang, Zhi-Wei
Zhang, Shu
Wang, Zhi-Ming
Chen, Ping
Zhao, Yan
Wang, Gang
Zhao, Kun
Li, Jie-Shou
author_sort Liu, Xin-Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols or fast-track (FT) programs enable a shorter hospital stay and lower complication rate. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with a lesser trauma and a quicker recovery in many elective abdominal surgeries. However, little is known of the safety and effectiveness made by ERAS protocols combined with MIS for gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness made by FT programs and MIS in combination or alone. METHODS: We summarized an 11-year experience on gastric cancer patients undergoing elective laparotomy or minimally invasive gastric resection in standard cares (SC) or FT programs during January 2004 to December 2014. A total of 984 patients were enrolled and assigned into four groups: open gastrectomies (OG) with SC (OG + SC group, n = 167); OG with FT programs (OG + FT group, n = 277); laparoscopic gastrectomies (LG) with FT programs (LG + FT group, n = 248); and robot-assisted gastrectomies (RG) with FT programs (RG + FT group, n = 292). Patients’ data were collected to evaluate the clinical outcome. The primary end point was the length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: The OG + SC group showed the longest postoperative hospital stay (mean: 12.3 days, median: 11 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 6–16 days), while OG + FT, LG + FT, and RG + FT groups recovered faster (mean: 7.4, 6.4, and 6.6 days, median: 6, 6, and 6 days, IQR: 3–9, 4–8, and 3–9 days, respectively, all P < 0.001). The postoperative rehabilitation parameters such as flatus time after surgery (4.7 ± 0.9, 3.1 ± 0.8, 3.0 ± 0.9, and 3.1 ± 0.9 days) followed the same manner. After 30 postoperative days’ follow-up, the total incidence of complications was 9.6% in OG + SC group, 10.1% in OG + FT group, 8.1% in LG + FT group, and 10.3% in RG + FT group. The complications showed no significant differences between the four groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocols alone could significantly bring fast recovery after surgery regardless of the surgical technique. MIS further reduces postoperative hospital stay. It is safe and effective to apply ERAS protocols combined with MIS for gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5040014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50400142016-10-12 “Fast-track” and “Minimally Invasive” Surgery for Gastric Cancer Liu, Xin-Xin Pan, Hua-Feng Jiang, Zhi-Wei Zhang, Shu Wang, Zhi-Ming Chen, Ping Zhao, Yan Wang, Gang Zhao, Kun Li, Jie-Shou Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols or fast-track (FT) programs enable a shorter hospital stay and lower complication rate. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with a lesser trauma and a quicker recovery in many elective abdominal surgeries. However, little is known of the safety and effectiveness made by ERAS protocols combined with MIS for gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness made by FT programs and MIS in combination or alone. METHODS: We summarized an 11-year experience on gastric cancer patients undergoing elective laparotomy or minimally invasive gastric resection in standard cares (SC) or FT programs during January 2004 to December 2014. A total of 984 patients were enrolled and assigned into four groups: open gastrectomies (OG) with SC (OG + SC group, n = 167); OG with FT programs (OG + FT group, n = 277); laparoscopic gastrectomies (LG) with FT programs (LG + FT group, n = 248); and robot-assisted gastrectomies (RG) with FT programs (RG + FT group, n = 292). Patients’ data were collected to evaluate the clinical outcome. The primary end point was the length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: The OG + SC group showed the longest postoperative hospital stay (mean: 12.3 days, median: 11 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 6–16 days), while OG + FT, LG + FT, and RG + FT groups recovered faster (mean: 7.4, 6.4, and 6.6 days, median: 6, 6, and 6 days, IQR: 3–9, 4–8, and 3–9 days, respectively, all P < 0.001). The postoperative rehabilitation parameters such as flatus time after surgery (4.7 ± 0.9, 3.1 ± 0.8, 3.0 ± 0.9, and 3.1 ± 0.9 days) followed the same manner. After 30 postoperative days’ follow-up, the total incidence of complications was 9.6% in OG + SC group, 10.1% in OG + FT group, 8.1% in LG + FT group, and 10.3% in RG + FT group. The complications showed no significant differences between the four groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocols alone could significantly bring fast recovery after surgery regardless of the surgical technique. MIS further reduces postoperative hospital stay. It is safe and effective to apply ERAS protocols combined with MIS for gastric cancer. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5040014/ /pubmed/27647187 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.190659 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Liu, Xin-Xin
Pan, Hua-Feng
Jiang, Zhi-Wei
Zhang, Shu
Wang, Zhi-Ming
Chen, Ping
Zhao, Yan
Wang, Gang
Zhao, Kun
Li, Jie-Shou
“Fast-track” and “Minimally Invasive” Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title “Fast-track” and “Minimally Invasive” Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_full “Fast-track” and “Minimally Invasive” Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr “Fast-track” and “Minimally Invasive” Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed “Fast-track” and “Minimally Invasive” Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_short “Fast-track” and “Minimally Invasive” Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_sort “fast-track” and “minimally invasive” surgery for gastric cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27647187
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.190659
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxinxin fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT panhuafeng fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT jiangzhiwei fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT zhangshu fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT wangzhiming fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT chenping fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT zhaoyan fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT wanggang fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT zhaokun fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer
AT lijieshou fasttrackandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastriccancer