Cargando…

Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances

BACKGROUND: Using lingual enamel surfaces for bracket placement not only has esthetic advantages, but may also be suitable in terms of reducing frequencies of enamel decalcifications. OBJECTIVE: To test the null-hypothesis that there is no significant difference in enamel decalcification or cavitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knösel, Michael, Klang, Elisabeth, Helms, Hans-Joachim, Wiechmann, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26420772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv069
_version_ 1782456193604648960
author Knösel, Michael
Klang, Elisabeth
Helms, Hans-Joachim
Wiechmann, Dirk
author_facet Knösel, Michael
Klang, Elisabeth
Helms, Hans-Joachim
Wiechmann, Dirk
author_sort Knösel, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Using lingual enamel surfaces for bracket placement not only has esthetic advantages, but may also be suitable in terms of reducing frequencies of enamel decalcifications. OBJECTIVE: To test the null-hypothesis that there is no significant difference in enamel decalcification or cavitation incidence adjacent to and beneath bracket bases between two lingual multi-bracket (MB) appliances that are different in terms of design, material composition, and manufacturing technology (group A: WIN, DW-LingualSystems; group B: Incognito, 3M-Unitek), taking into account patient- and treatment-related variables on white spot lesion (WSL) formation. METHODS: Standardized, digital, top-view photographs of 630 consecutive subjects (16214 teeth; n (Incognito) = 237/6076 teeth; n (WIN) = 393/10138 teeth; mean age: 17.47±7.8; m/f 43.2/56.8%) with completed lingual MB treatment of the upper and lower permanent teeth 1–7 were screened for decalcification or cavitation adjacent to and beneath the bracket bases before and after treatment, scored from 0 to 7. Non-parametric ANOVA was used for main effects ‘appliance type’, ‘gender’, ‘treatment complexity’, ‘grouped age’ (≤16/>16 years), and ‘treatment duration’ as covariable, at an α-level of 5%. RESULTS: About 2.57% [5.94%] of all teeth in group A [B] developed decalcifications. Subject-related incidence was 9.59% [16.17%] for upper incisors in group A [B], and 12.98% [25.74%] for all teeth 16–46. There were significant effects by gender, age, and treatment duration. CONCLUSION: The null-hypothesis was rejected: sub-bracket lesions were significantly less frequent in group A, while frequencies of WSL adjacent to brackets were not significantly affected by appliance type. In view of the overall low incidences of lingual post-orthodontic white-spot lesions, the use of lingual appliances is advocated as a valid strategy for a reduction of enamel decalcifications during orthodontic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5040132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50401322016-09-29 Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances Knösel, Michael Klang, Elisabeth Helms, Hans-Joachim Wiechmann, Dirk Eur J Orthod Original Article BACKGROUND: Using lingual enamel surfaces for bracket placement not only has esthetic advantages, but may also be suitable in terms of reducing frequencies of enamel decalcifications. OBJECTIVE: To test the null-hypothesis that there is no significant difference in enamel decalcification or cavitation incidence adjacent to and beneath bracket bases between two lingual multi-bracket (MB) appliances that are different in terms of design, material composition, and manufacturing technology (group A: WIN, DW-LingualSystems; group B: Incognito, 3M-Unitek), taking into account patient- and treatment-related variables on white spot lesion (WSL) formation. METHODS: Standardized, digital, top-view photographs of 630 consecutive subjects (16214 teeth; n (Incognito) = 237/6076 teeth; n (WIN) = 393/10138 teeth; mean age: 17.47±7.8; m/f 43.2/56.8%) with completed lingual MB treatment of the upper and lower permanent teeth 1–7 were screened for decalcification or cavitation adjacent to and beneath the bracket bases before and after treatment, scored from 0 to 7. Non-parametric ANOVA was used for main effects ‘appliance type’, ‘gender’, ‘treatment complexity’, ‘grouped age’ (≤16/>16 years), and ‘treatment duration’ as covariable, at an α-level of 5%. RESULTS: About 2.57% [5.94%] of all teeth in group A [B] developed decalcifications. Subject-related incidence was 9.59% [16.17%] for upper incisors in group A [B], and 12.98% [25.74%] for all teeth 16–46. There were significant effects by gender, age, and treatment duration. CONCLUSION: The null-hypothesis was rejected: sub-bracket lesions were significantly less frequent in group A, while frequencies of WSL adjacent to brackets were not significantly affected by appliance type. In view of the overall low incidences of lingual post-orthodontic white-spot lesions, the use of lingual appliances is advocated as a valid strategy for a reduction of enamel decalcifications during orthodontic treatment. Oxford University Press 2016-10 2015-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5040132/ /pubmed/26420772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv069 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Knösel, Michael
Klang, Elisabeth
Helms, Hans-Joachim
Wiechmann, Dirk
Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances
title Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances
title_full Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances
title_fullStr Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances
title_full_unstemmed Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances
title_short Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances
title_sort occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26420772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv069
work_keys_str_mv AT knoselmichael occurrenceandseverityofenameldecalcificationadjacenttobracketbasesandsubbracketlesionsduringorthodontictreatmentwithtwodifferentlingualappliances
AT klangelisabeth occurrenceandseverityofenameldecalcificationadjacenttobracketbasesandsubbracketlesionsduringorthodontictreatmentwithtwodifferentlingualappliances
AT helmshansjoachim occurrenceandseverityofenameldecalcificationadjacenttobracketbasesandsubbracketlesionsduringorthodontictreatmentwithtwodifferentlingualappliances
AT wiechmanndirk occurrenceandseverityofenameldecalcificationadjacenttobracketbasesandsubbracketlesionsduringorthodontictreatmentwithtwodifferentlingualappliances