Cargando…

Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines

BACKGROUND: For tumour imaging with PET, the literature proposes to administer a patient-specific FDG activity that depends quadratically on a patient’s body weight. However, a practical approach on how to implement such a protocol in clinical practice is currently lacking. We aimed to provide a pra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koopman, Daniëlle, van Osch, Jochen A. C., Jager, Pieter L., Tenbergen, Carlijn J. A., Knollema, Siert, Slump, Cornelis H., van Dalen, Jorn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0158-z
_version_ 1782456264349974528
author Koopman, Daniëlle
van Osch, Jochen A. C.
Jager, Pieter L.
Tenbergen, Carlijn J. A.
Knollema, Siert
Slump, Cornelis H.
van Dalen, Jorn A.
author_facet Koopman, Daniëlle
van Osch, Jochen A. C.
Jager, Pieter L.
Tenbergen, Carlijn J. A.
Knollema, Siert
Slump, Cornelis H.
van Dalen, Jorn A.
author_sort Koopman, Daniëlle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For tumour imaging with PET, the literature proposes to administer a patient-specific FDG activity that depends quadratically on a patient’s body weight. However, a practical approach on how to implement such a protocol in clinical practice is currently lacking. We aimed to provide a practical method to determine a FDG activity formula for whole-body PET examinations that satisfies both the EANM guidelines and this quadratic relation. RESULTS: We have developed a methodology that results in a formula describing the patient-specific FDG activity to administer. A PET study using the NEMA NU-2001 image quality phantom forms the basis of our method. This phantom needs to be filled with 2.0 and 20.0 kBq FDG/mL in the background and spheres, respectively. After a PET acquisition of 10 min, a reconstruction has to be performed that results in sphere recovery coefficients (RCs) that are within the specifications as defined by the EANM Research Ltd (EARL). By performing reconstructions based on shorter scan durations, the minimal scan time per bed position (T(min)) needs to be extracted using an image coefficient of variation (COV) of 15 %. At T(min), the RCs should be within EARL specifications as well. Finally, the FDG activity (in MBq) to administer can be described by [Formula: see text] with c a constant that is typically 0.0533 (MBq/kg(2)), w the patient’s body weight (in kg), and t the scan time per bed position that is chosen in a clinical setting (in seconds). We successfully demonstrated this methodology using a state-of-the-art PET/CT scanner. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a practical method that results in a formula describing the FDG activity to administer to individual patients for whole-body PET examinations, taking into account both the EANM guidelines and a quadratic relation between FDG activity and patient’s body weight. This formula is generally applicable to any PET system, using a specified image reconstruction and scan time per bed position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5040656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50406562016-10-12 Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines Koopman, Daniëlle van Osch, Jochen A. C. Jager, Pieter L. Tenbergen, Carlijn J. A. Knollema, Siert Slump, Cornelis H. van Dalen, Jorn A. EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: For tumour imaging with PET, the literature proposes to administer a patient-specific FDG activity that depends quadratically on a patient’s body weight. However, a practical approach on how to implement such a protocol in clinical practice is currently lacking. We aimed to provide a practical method to determine a FDG activity formula for whole-body PET examinations that satisfies both the EANM guidelines and this quadratic relation. RESULTS: We have developed a methodology that results in a formula describing the patient-specific FDG activity to administer. A PET study using the NEMA NU-2001 image quality phantom forms the basis of our method. This phantom needs to be filled with 2.0 and 20.0 kBq FDG/mL in the background and spheres, respectively. After a PET acquisition of 10 min, a reconstruction has to be performed that results in sphere recovery coefficients (RCs) that are within the specifications as defined by the EANM Research Ltd (EARL). By performing reconstructions based on shorter scan durations, the minimal scan time per bed position (T(min)) needs to be extracted using an image coefficient of variation (COV) of 15 %. At T(min), the RCs should be within EARL specifications as well. Finally, the FDG activity (in MBq) to administer can be described by [Formula: see text] with c a constant that is typically 0.0533 (MBq/kg(2)), w the patient’s body weight (in kg), and t the scan time per bed position that is chosen in a clinical setting (in seconds). We successfully demonstrated this methodology using a state-of-the-art PET/CT scanner. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a practical method that results in a formula describing the FDG activity to administer to individual patients for whole-body PET examinations, taking into account both the EANM guidelines and a quadratic relation between FDG activity and patient’s body weight. This formula is generally applicable to any PET system, using a specified image reconstruction and scan time per bed position. Springer International Publishing 2016-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5040656/ /pubmed/27682837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0158-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Koopman, Daniëlle
van Osch, Jochen A. C.
Jager, Pieter L.
Tenbergen, Carlijn J. A.
Knollema, Siert
Slump, Cornelis H.
van Dalen, Jorn A.
Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines
title Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines
title_full Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines
title_fullStr Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines
title_short Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines
title_sort technical note: how to determine the fdg activity for tumour pet imaging that satisfies european guidelines
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0158-z
work_keys_str_mv AT koopmandanielle technicalnotehowtodeterminethefdgactivityfortumourpetimagingthatsatisfieseuropeanguidelines
AT vanoschjochenac technicalnotehowtodeterminethefdgactivityfortumourpetimagingthatsatisfieseuropeanguidelines
AT jagerpieterl technicalnotehowtodeterminethefdgactivityfortumourpetimagingthatsatisfieseuropeanguidelines
AT tenbergencarlijnja technicalnotehowtodeterminethefdgactivityfortumourpetimagingthatsatisfieseuropeanguidelines
AT knollemasiert technicalnotehowtodeterminethefdgactivityfortumourpetimagingthatsatisfieseuropeanguidelines
AT slumpcornelish technicalnotehowtodeterminethefdgactivityfortumourpetimagingthatsatisfieseuropeanguidelines
AT vandalenjorna technicalnotehowtodeterminethefdgactivityfortumourpetimagingthatsatisfieseuropeanguidelines