Cargando…

Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign

BACKGROUND: Federal and state public health agencies in the United States are increasingly using digital advertising and social media to promote messages from broader multimedia campaigns. However, little evidence exists on population-level campaign awareness and relative cost efficiencies of digita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Kevin C, Shafer, Paul R, Rodes, Robert, Kim, Annice, Hansen, Heather, Patel, Deesha, Coln, Caryn, Beistle, Diane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27627853
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5683
_version_ 1782456304321691648
author Davis, Kevin C
Shafer, Paul R
Rodes, Robert
Kim, Annice
Hansen, Heather
Patel, Deesha
Coln, Caryn
Beistle, Diane
author_facet Davis, Kevin C
Shafer, Paul R
Rodes, Robert
Kim, Annice
Hansen, Heather
Patel, Deesha
Coln, Caryn
Beistle, Diane
author_sort Davis, Kevin C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Federal and state public health agencies in the United States are increasingly using digital advertising and social media to promote messages from broader multimedia campaigns. However, little evidence exists on population-level campaign awareness and relative cost efficiencies of digital advertising in the context of a comprehensive public health education campaign. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the impact of increased doses of digital video and television advertising from the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers (Tips) campaign on overall campaign awareness at the population level. We also compared the relative cost efficiencies across these media platforms. METHODS: We used data from a large national online survey of approximately 15,000 US smokers conducted in 2013 immediately after the conclusion of the 2013 Tips campaign. These data were used to compare the effects of variation in media dose of digital video and television advertising on population-level awareness of the Tips campaign. We implemented higher doses of digital video among selected media markets and randomly selected other markets to receive similar higher doses of television ads. Multivariate logistic regressions estimated the odds of overall campaign awareness via digital or television format as a function of higher-dose media in each market area. All statistical tests used the .05 threshold for statistical significance and the .10 level for marginal nonsignificance. We used adjusted advertising costs for the additional doses of digital and television advertising to compare the cost efficiencies of digital and television advertising on the basis of costs per percentage point of population awareness generated. RESULTS: Higher-dose digital video advertising was associated with 94% increased odds of awareness of any ad online relative to standard-dose markets (P<.001). Higher-dose digital advertising was associated with a marginally nonsignificant increase (46%) in overall campaign awareness regardless of media format (P=.09). Higher-dose television advertising was associated with 81% increased odds of overall ad awareness regardless of media format (P<.001). Increased doses of television advertising were also associated with significantly higher odds of awareness of any ad on television (P<.001) and online (P=.04). The adjusted cost of each additional percentage point of population-level reach generated by higher doses of advertising was approximately US $440,000 for digital advertising and US $1 million for television advertising. CONCLUSIONS: Television advertising generated relatively higher levels of overall campaign awareness. However, digital video was relatively more cost efficient for generating awareness. These results suggest that digital video may be used as a cost-efficient complement to traditional advertising modes (eg, television), but digital video should not replace television given the relatively smaller audience size of digital video viewers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5040867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50408672016-10-18 Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign Davis, Kevin C Shafer, Paul R Rodes, Robert Kim, Annice Hansen, Heather Patel, Deesha Coln, Caryn Beistle, Diane J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Federal and state public health agencies in the United States are increasingly using digital advertising and social media to promote messages from broader multimedia campaigns. However, little evidence exists on population-level campaign awareness and relative cost efficiencies of digital advertising in the context of a comprehensive public health education campaign. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the impact of increased doses of digital video and television advertising from the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers (Tips) campaign on overall campaign awareness at the population level. We also compared the relative cost efficiencies across these media platforms. METHODS: We used data from a large national online survey of approximately 15,000 US smokers conducted in 2013 immediately after the conclusion of the 2013 Tips campaign. These data were used to compare the effects of variation in media dose of digital video and television advertising on population-level awareness of the Tips campaign. We implemented higher doses of digital video among selected media markets and randomly selected other markets to receive similar higher doses of television ads. Multivariate logistic regressions estimated the odds of overall campaign awareness via digital or television format as a function of higher-dose media in each market area. All statistical tests used the .05 threshold for statistical significance and the .10 level for marginal nonsignificance. We used adjusted advertising costs for the additional doses of digital and television advertising to compare the cost efficiencies of digital and television advertising on the basis of costs per percentage point of population awareness generated. RESULTS: Higher-dose digital video advertising was associated with 94% increased odds of awareness of any ad online relative to standard-dose markets (P<.001). Higher-dose digital advertising was associated with a marginally nonsignificant increase (46%) in overall campaign awareness regardless of media format (P=.09). Higher-dose television advertising was associated with 81% increased odds of overall ad awareness regardless of media format (P<.001). Increased doses of television advertising were also associated with significantly higher odds of awareness of any ad on television (P<.001) and online (P=.04). The adjusted cost of each additional percentage point of population-level reach generated by higher doses of advertising was approximately US $440,000 for digital advertising and US $1 million for television advertising. CONCLUSIONS: Television advertising generated relatively higher levels of overall campaign awareness. However, digital video was relatively more cost efficient for generating awareness. These results suggest that digital video may be used as a cost-efficient complement to traditional advertising modes (eg, television), but digital video should not replace television given the relatively smaller audience size of digital video viewers. JMIR Publications 2016-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5040867/ /pubmed/27627853 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5683 Text en ©Kevin C Davis, Paul R Shafer, Robert Rodes, Annice Kim, Heather Hansen, Deesha Patel, Caryn Coln, Diane Beistle. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.09.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Davis, Kevin C
Shafer, Paul R
Rodes, Robert
Kim, Annice
Hansen, Heather
Patel, Deesha
Coln, Caryn
Beistle, Diane
Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign
title Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign
title_full Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign
title_fullStr Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign
title_full_unstemmed Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign
title_short Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign
title_sort does digital video advertising increase population-level reach of multimedia campaigns? evidence from the 2013 tips from former smokers campaign
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27627853
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5683
work_keys_str_mv AT daviskevinc doesdigitalvideoadvertisingincreasepopulationlevelreachofmultimediacampaignsevidencefromthe2013tipsfromformersmokerscampaign
AT shaferpaulr doesdigitalvideoadvertisingincreasepopulationlevelreachofmultimediacampaignsevidencefromthe2013tipsfromformersmokerscampaign
AT rodesrobert doesdigitalvideoadvertisingincreasepopulationlevelreachofmultimediacampaignsevidencefromthe2013tipsfromformersmokerscampaign
AT kimannice doesdigitalvideoadvertisingincreasepopulationlevelreachofmultimediacampaignsevidencefromthe2013tipsfromformersmokerscampaign
AT hansenheather doesdigitalvideoadvertisingincreasepopulationlevelreachofmultimediacampaignsevidencefromthe2013tipsfromformersmokerscampaign
AT pateldeesha doesdigitalvideoadvertisingincreasepopulationlevelreachofmultimediacampaignsevidencefromthe2013tipsfromformersmokerscampaign
AT colncaryn doesdigitalvideoadvertisingincreasepopulationlevelreachofmultimediacampaignsevidencefromthe2013tipsfromformersmokerscampaign
AT beistlediane doesdigitalvideoadvertisingincreasepopulationlevelreachofmultimediacampaignsevidencefromthe2013tipsfromformersmokerscampaign