Cargando…

Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis

Numerous studies have investigated the utility of serum intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (I-FABP) in differentiating acute intestinal ischemia from acute abdomen. However, the results remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the overall accuracy of serum I-FABP in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Da-Li, Cen, Yun-Yun, Li, Shu-Min, Li, Wei-Ming, Lu, Qi-Ping, Xu, Peng-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27681959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34371
_version_ 1782456352150388736
author Sun, Da-Li
Cen, Yun-Yun
Li, Shu-Min
Li, Wei-Ming
Lu, Qi-Ping
Xu, Peng-Yuan
author_facet Sun, Da-Li
Cen, Yun-Yun
Li, Shu-Min
Li, Wei-Ming
Lu, Qi-Ping
Xu, Peng-Yuan
author_sort Sun, Da-Li
collection PubMed
description Numerous studies have investigated the utility of serum intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (I-FABP) in differentiating acute intestinal ischemia from acute abdomen. However, the results remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the overall accuracy of serum I-FABP in the diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia. Publications addressing the accuracy of serum I-FABP in the diagnosis of ischemic bowel diseases were selected from databases. The values of true-positive (TP), true-negative (TN), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) were extracted or calculated for each study. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. The overall diagnostic performance was assessed using a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) and area under curve (AUC). Nine studies that collectively included 1246 patients met the eligible criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, and NLR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72–0.86), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73–0.93), 24 (95% CI: 9–65), 5.5 (95% CI: 2.8–10.8) and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15–0.35), respectively. The AUC was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.89). The meta-analysis carried out in this report suggests that the I-FABP may be a useful diagnostic tool to confirm acute intestinal ischemia in acute abdomen, but better-designed trials are still required to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5041130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50411302016-09-30 Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis Sun, Da-Li Cen, Yun-Yun Li, Shu-Min Li, Wei-Ming Lu, Qi-Ping Xu, Peng-Yuan Sci Rep Article Numerous studies have investigated the utility of serum intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (I-FABP) in differentiating acute intestinal ischemia from acute abdomen. However, the results remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the overall accuracy of serum I-FABP in the diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia. Publications addressing the accuracy of serum I-FABP in the diagnosis of ischemic bowel diseases were selected from databases. The values of true-positive (TP), true-negative (TN), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) were extracted or calculated for each study. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. The overall diagnostic performance was assessed using a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) and area under curve (AUC). Nine studies that collectively included 1246 patients met the eligible criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, and NLR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72–0.86), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73–0.93), 24 (95% CI: 9–65), 5.5 (95% CI: 2.8–10.8) and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15–0.35), respectively. The AUC was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.89). The meta-analysis carried out in this report suggests that the I-FABP may be a useful diagnostic tool to confirm acute intestinal ischemia in acute abdomen, but better-designed trials are still required to confirm our findings. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5041130/ /pubmed/27681959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34371 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Sun, Da-Li
Cen, Yun-Yun
Li, Shu-Min
Li, Wei-Ming
Lu, Qi-Ping
Xu, Peng-Yuan
Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis
title Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27681959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34371
work_keys_str_mv AT sundali accuracyoftheserumintestinalfattyacidbindingproteinfordiagnosisofacuteintestinalischemiaametaanalysis
AT cenyunyun accuracyoftheserumintestinalfattyacidbindingproteinfordiagnosisofacuteintestinalischemiaametaanalysis
AT lishumin accuracyoftheserumintestinalfattyacidbindingproteinfordiagnosisofacuteintestinalischemiaametaanalysis
AT liweiming accuracyoftheserumintestinalfattyacidbindingproteinfordiagnosisofacuteintestinalischemiaametaanalysis
AT luqiping accuracyoftheserumintestinalfattyacidbindingproteinfordiagnosisofacuteintestinalischemiaametaanalysis
AT xupengyuan accuracyoftheserumintestinalfattyacidbindingproteinfordiagnosisofacuteintestinalischemiaametaanalysis