Cargando…

Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation

Genome transplantation (GT) allows the installation of purified chromosomes into recipient cells, causing the resulting organisms to adopt the genotype and the phenotype conferred by the donor cells. This key process remains a bottleneck in synthetic biology, especially for genome engineering strate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labroussaa, Fabien, Lebaudy, Anne, Baby, Vincent, Gourgues, Géraldine, Matteau, Dominick, Vashee, Sanjay, Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal, Rodrigue, Sébastien, Lartigue, Carole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw688
_version_ 1782456424117305344
author Labroussaa, Fabien
Lebaudy, Anne
Baby, Vincent
Gourgues, Géraldine
Matteau, Dominick
Vashee, Sanjay
Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal
Rodrigue, Sébastien
Lartigue, Carole
author_facet Labroussaa, Fabien
Lebaudy, Anne
Baby, Vincent
Gourgues, Géraldine
Matteau, Dominick
Vashee, Sanjay
Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal
Rodrigue, Sébastien
Lartigue, Carole
author_sort Labroussaa, Fabien
collection PubMed
description Genome transplantation (GT) allows the installation of purified chromosomes into recipient cells, causing the resulting organisms to adopt the genotype and the phenotype conferred by the donor cells. This key process remains a bottleneck in synthetic biology, especially for genome engineering strategies of intractable and economically important microbial species. So far, this process has only been reported using two closely related bacteria, Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. capri (Mmc) and Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capricolum (Mcap), and the main factors driving the compatibility between a donor genome and a recipient cell are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of the evolutionary distance between donor and recipient species on the efficiency of GT. Using Mcap as the recipient cell, we successfully transplanted the genome of six bacteria belonging to the Spiroplasma phylogenetic group but including species of two distinct genera. Our results demonstrate that GT efficiency is inversely correlated with the phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient bacteria but also suggest that other species-specific barriers to GT exist. This work constitutes an important step toward understanding the cellular factors governing the GT process in order to better define and eventually extend the existing genome compatibility limit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5041484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50414842016-09-30 Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation Labroussaa, Fabien Lebaudy, Anne Baby, Vincent Gourgues, Géraldine Matteau, Dominick Vashee, Sanjay Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal Rodrigue, Sébastien Lartigue, Carole Nucleic Acids Res Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering Genome transplantation (GT) allows the installation of purified chromosomes into recipient cells, causing the resulting organisms to adopt the genotype and the phenotype conferred by the donor cells. This key process remains a bottleneck in synthetic biology, especially for genome engineering strategies of intractable and economically important microbial species. So far, this process has only been reported using two closely related bacteria, Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. capri (Mmc) and Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capricolum (Mcap), and the main factors driving the compatibility between a donor genome and a recipient cell are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of the evolutionary distance between donor and recipient species on the efficiency of GT. Using Mcap as the recipient cell, we successfully transplanted the genome of six bacteria belonging to the Spiroplasma phylogenetic group but including species of two distinct genera. Our results demonstrate that GT efficiency is inversely correlated with the phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient bacteria but also suggest that other species-specific barriers to GT exist. This work constitutes an important step toward understanding the cellular factors governing the GT process in order to better define and eventually extend the existing genome compatibility limit. Oxford University Press 2016-09-30 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5041484/ /pubmed/27488189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw688 Text en © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering
Labroussaa, Fabien
Lebaudy, Anne
Baby, Vincent
Gourgues, Géraldine
Matteau, Dominick
Vashee, Sanjay
Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal
Rodrigue, Sébastien
Lartigue, Carole
Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation
title Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation
title_full Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation
title_fullStr Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation
title_short Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation
title_sort impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation
topic Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw688
work_keys_str_mv AT labroussaafabien impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation
AT lebaudyanne impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation
AT babyvincent impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation
AT gourguesgeraldine impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation
AT matteaudominick impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation
AT vasheesanjay impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation
AT sirandpugnetpascal impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation
AT rodriguesebastien impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation
AT lartiguecarole impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation