Cargando…
Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation
Genome transplantation (GT) allows the installation of purified chromosomes into recipient cells, causing the resulting organisms to adopt the genotype and the phenotype conferred by the donor cells. This key process remains a bottleneck in synthetic biology, especially for genome engineering strate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw688 |
_version_ | 1782456424117305344 |
---|---|
author | Labroussaa, Fabien Lebaudy, Anne Baby, Vincent Gourgues, Géraldine Matteau, Dominick Vashee, Sanjay Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal Rodrigue, Sébastien Lartigue, Carole |
author_facet | Labroussaa, Fabien Lebaudy, Anne Baby, Vincent Gourgues, Géraldine Matteau, Dominick Vashee, Sanjay Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal Rodrigue, Sébastien Lartigue, Carole |
author_sort | Labroussaa, Fabien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genome transplantation (GT) allows the installation of purified chromosomes into recipient cells, causing the resulting organisms to adopt the genotype and the phenotype conferred by the donor cells. This key process remains a bottleneck in synthetic biology, especially for genome engineering strategies of intractable and economically important microbial species. So far, this process has only been reported using two closely related bacteria, Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. capri (Mmc) and Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capricolum (Mcap), and the main factors driving the compatibility between a donor genome and a recipient cell are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of the evolutionary distance between donor and recipient species on the efficiency of GT. Using Mcap as the recipient cell, we successfully transplanted the genome of six bacteria belonging to the Spiroplasma phylogenetic group but including species of two distinct genera. Our results demonstrate that GT efficiency is inversely correlated with the phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient bacteria but also suggest that other species-specific barriers to GT exist. This work constitutes an important step toward understanding the cellular factors governing the GT process in order to better define and eventually extend the existing genome compatibility limit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5041484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50414842016-09-30 Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation Labroussaa, Fabien Lebaudy, Anne Baby, Vincent Gourgues, Géraldine Matteau, Dominick Vashee, Sanjay Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal Rodrigue, Sébastien Lartigue, Carole Nucleic Acids Res Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering Genome transplantation (GT) allows the installation of purified chromosomes into recipient cells, causing the resulting organisms to adopt the genotype and the phenotype conferred by the donor cells. This key process remains a bottleneck in synthetic biology, especially for genome engineering strategies of intractable and economically important microbial species. So far, this process has only been reported using two closely related bacteria, Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. capri (Mmc) and Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capricolum (Mcap), and the main factors driving the compatibility between a donor genome and a recipient cell are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of the evolutionary distance between donor and recipient species on the efficiency of GT. Using Mcap as the recipient cell, we successfully transplanted the genome of six bacteria belonging to the Spiroplasma phylogenetic group but including species of two distinct genera. Our results demonstrate that GT efficiency is inversely correlated with the phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient bacteria but also suggest that other species-specific barriers to GT exist. This work constitutes an important step toward understanding the cellular factors governing the GT process in order to better define and eventually extend the existing genome compatibility limit. Oxford University Press 2016-09-30 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5041484/ /pubmed/27488189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw688 Text en © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering Labroussaa, Fabien Lebaudy, Anne Baby, Vincent Gourgues, Géraldine Matteau, Dominick Vashee, Sanjay Sirand-Pugnet, Pascal Rodrigue, Sébastien Lartigue, Carole Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation |
title | Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation |
title_full | Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation |
title_fullStr | Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation |
title_short | Impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation |
title_sort | impact of donor–recipient phylogenetic distance on bacterial genome transplantation |
topic | Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT labroussaafabien impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation AT lebaudyanne impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation AT babyvincent impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation AT gourguesgeraldine impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation AT matteaudominick impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation AT vasheesanjay impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation AT sirandpugnetpascal impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation AT rodriguesebastien impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation AT lartiguecarole impactofdonorrecipientphylogeneticdistanceonbacterialgenometransplantation |