Cargando…

A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale

BACKGROUND: Gender bias within medical education is gaining increasing attention. However, valid and reliable measures are needed to adequately address and monitor this issue. This research conducts a psychometric evaluation of a short multidimensional scale that assesses medical students’ awareness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parker, Rhiannon B., Parker, Philip D., Larkin, Theresa, Cockburn, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0774-2
_version_ 1782456441183928320
author Parker, Rhiannon B.
Parker, Philip D.
Larkin, Theresa
Cockburn, Jon
author_facet Parker, Rhiannon B.
Parker, Philip D.
Larkin, Theresa
Cockburn, Jon
author_sort Parker, Rhiannon B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gender bias within medical education is gaining increasing attention. However, valid and reliable measures are needed to adequately address and monitor this issue. This research conducts a psychometric evaluation of a short multidimensional scale that assesses medical students’ awareness of gender bias, beliefs that gender bias should be addressed, and experience of gender bias during medical education. METHODS: Using students from the University of Wollongong, one pilot study and two empirical studies were conducted. The pilot study was used to scope the domain space (n = 28). This initial measure was extended to develop the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale (GBMES). For Study 1 (n = 172), confirmatory factor analysis assessed the construct validity of the three-factor structure (awareness, beliefs, experience) and enabled deletion of redundant items. Study 2 (n = 457) tested the generalizability of the refined scale to a new sample. Combining Study 1 and 2, invariance testing for program of study and gender was explored. The relationship of the GBMES to demographic and gender politics variables was tested. The results were analyzed in R using confirmatory factor analysis and Multiple-Indicator-Multiple-Indicator-Cause models. RESULTS: After analysis of the responses from the original 16-item GBMES (Study 1), a shortened measure of ten items fitted the data well (RMSEA = .063; CFI = .965; TLI = .951; Mean R-square of items = 58.6 %; reliability: .720–.910) and was found to generalize to a new sample in Study 2 (RMSEA = .068; CFI = .952; TLI = .933; Mean R-square of items = 55.9 %; reliability: .711–.892). The GBMES was found to be invariant across studies, gender, and program of study. Female students and those who supported gender equality had greater agreement for each of the factors. Likewise, postgraduate students reported higher scores on experience of gender bias than undergraduate students. CONCLUSION: The GBMES provides a validated short multidimensional measure for use in research and policy. Given its good reliability across different target populations and its concise length, the GBMES has much potential for application in research and education to assess students’ attitudes towards gender bias. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0774-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5041577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50415772016-10-05 A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale Parker, Rhiannon B. Parker, Philip D. Larkin, Theresa Cockburn, Jon BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Gender bias within medical education is gaining increasing attention. However, valid and reliable measures are needed to adequately address and monitor this issue. This research conducts a psychometric evaluation of a short multidimensional scale that assesses medical students’ awareness of gender bias, beliefs that gender bias should be addressed, and experience of gender bias during medical education. METHODS: Using students from the University of Wollongong, one pilot study and two empirical studies were conducted. The pilot study was used to scope the domain space (n = 28). This initial measure was extended to develop the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale (GBMES). For Study 1 (n = 172), confirmatory factor analysis assessed the construct validity of the three-factor structure (awareness, beliefs, experience) and enabled deletion of redundant items. Study 2 (n = 457) tested the generalizability of the refined scale to a new sample. Combining Study 1 and 2, invariance testing for program of study and gender was explored. The relationship of the GBMES to demographic and gender politics variables was tested. The results were analyzed in R using confirmatory factor analysis and Multiple-Indicator-Multiple-Indicator-Cause models. RESULTS: After analysis of the responses from the original 16-item GBMES (Study 1), a shortened measure of ten items fitted the data well (RMSEA = .063; CFI = .965; TLI = .951; Mean R-square of items = 58.6 %; reliability: .720–.910) and was found to generalize to a new sample in Study 2 (RMSEA = .068; CFI = .952; TLI = .933; Mean R-square of items = 55.9 %; reliability: .711–.892). The GBMES was found to be invariant across studies, gender, and program of study. Female students and those who supported gender equality had greater agreement for each of the factors. Likewise, postgraduate students reported higher scores on experience of gender bias than undergraduate students. CONCLUSION: The GBMES provides a validated short multidimensional measure for use in research and policy. Given its good reliability across different target populations and its concise length, the GBMES has much potential for application in research and education to assess students’ attitudes towards gender bias. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0774-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5041577/ /pubmed/27682146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0774-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parker, Rhiannon B.
Parker, Philip D.
Larkin, Theresa
Cockburn, Jon
A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale
title A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale
title_full A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale
title_fullStr A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale
title_full_unstemmed A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale
title_short A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale
title_sort psychometric evaluation of the gender bias in medical education scale
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0774-2
work_keys_str_mv AT parkerrhiannonb apsychometricevaluationofthegenderbiasinmedicaleducationscale
AT parkerphilipd apsychometricevaluationofthegenderbiasinmedicaleducationscale
AT larkintheresa apsychometricevaluationofthegenderbiasinmedicaleducationscale
AT cockburnjon apsychometricevaluationofthegenderbiasinmedicaleducationscale
AT parkerrhiannonb psychometricevaluationofthegenderbiasinmedicaleducationscale
AT parkerphilipd psychometricevaluationofthegenderbiasinmedicaleducationscale
AT larkintheresa psychometricevaluationofthegenderbiasinmedicaleducationscale
AT cockburnjon psychometricevaluationofthegenderbiasinmedicaleducationscale