Cargando…

Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of large‐scale studies evaluating the clinical benefit of the Gaviscon Double Action (DA) alginate‐antacid formulation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. AIM: Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled parallel‐group study to evaluate efficac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, J., Yang, C., Zhao, H., Zheng, P., Wilkinson, J., Ng, B., Yuan, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26228097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.13334
_version_ 1782456542866440192
author Sun, J.
Yang, C.
Zhao, H.
Zheng, P.
Wilkinson, J.
Ng, B.
Yuan, Y.
author_facet Sun, J.
Yang, C.
Zhao, H.
Zheng, P.
Wilkinson, J.
Ng, B.
Yuan, Y.
author_sort Sun, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of large‐scale studies evaluating the clinical benefit of the Gaviscon Double Action (DA) alginate‐antacid formulation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. AIM: Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled parallel‐group study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Gaviscon DA in reducing heartburn, regurgitation and dyspepsia symptoms in individuals with mild‐to‐moderate GERD in China. METHODS: Participants with symptomatic GERD (n = 1107) were randomised to receive Gaviscon DA or placebo (two tablets four times daily) for seven consecutive days. The primary endpoint compared the change in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score for the GERD (heartburn + regurgitation) dimension between Gaviscon DA and placebo. Secondary endpoints compared the change in RDQ scores for individual heartburn, regurgitation and dyspepsia dimensions, overall treatment evaluation (OTE) scores and incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Mean RDQ GERD scores: 2.51 for Gaviscon DA and 2.50 for placebo at baseline; 1.25 for Gaviscon DA and 1.46 for placebo post treatment. Gaviscon DA was statistically superior to placebo in reducing GERD and dyspepsia RDQ scores [least‐squares mean (LSM) difference: GERD −0.21, P < 0.0001; dyspepsia −0.18, P = 0.0004], despite a substantial placebo response. The Gaviscon DA group reported more favourable overall treatment responses than the placebo group across all OTE categories (P < 0.0001). Superior relief of GERD symptoms was observed both in those with non‐erosive and those with erosive reflux disease (LSM difference −0.14 [P = 0.038] and −0.29 [P < 0.0001] respectively). Incidence of AEs was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Gaviscon DA tablets provide effective and safe reduction in acid reflux and dyspepsia symptoms in Chinese individuals with mild‐to‐moderate GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01869491
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5042071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50420712016-10-03 Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China Sun, J. Yang, C. Zhao, H. Zheng, P. Wilkinson, J. Ng, B. Yuan, Y. Aliment Pharmacol Ther Randomised Clinical Trials BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of large‐scale studies evaluating the clinical benefit of the Gaviscon Double Action (DA) alginate‐antacid formulation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. AIM: Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled parallel‐group study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Gaviscon DA in reducing heartburn, regurgitation and dyspepsia symptoms in individuals with mild‐to‐moderate GERD in China. METHODS: Participants with symptomatic GERD (n = 1107) were randomised to receive Gaviscon DA or placebo (two tablets four times daily) for seven consecutive days. The primary endpoint compared the change in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score for the GERD (heartburn + regurgitation) dimension between Gaviscon DA and placebo. Secondary endpoints compared the change in RDQ scores for individual heartburn, regurgitation and dyspepsia dimensions, overall treatment evaluation (OTE) scores and incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Mean RDQ GERD scores: 2.51 for Gaviscon DA and 2.50 for placebo at baseline; 1.25 for Gaviscon DA and 1.46 for placebo post treatment. Gaviscon DA was statistically superior to placebo in reducing GERD and dyspepsia RDQ scores [least‐squares mean (LSM) difference: GERD −0.21, P < 0.0001; dyspepsia −0.18, P = 0.0004], despite a substantial placebo response. The Gaviscon DA group reported more favourable overall treatment responses than the placebo group across all OTE categories (P < 0.0001). Superior relief of GERD symptoms was observed both in those with non‐erosive and those with erosive reflux disease (LSM difference −0.14 [P = 0.038] and −0.29 [P < 0.0001] respectively). Incidence of AEs was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Gaviscon DA tablets provide effective and safe reduction in acid reflux and dyspepsia symptoms in Chinese individuals with mild‐to‐moderate GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01869491 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-31 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5042071/ /pubmed/26228097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.13334 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Randomised Clinical Trials
Sun, J.
Yang, C.
Zhao, H.
Zheng, P.
Wilkinson, J.
Ng, B.
Yuan, Y.
Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China
title Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China
title_full Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China
title_fullStr Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China
title_full_unstemmed Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China
title_short Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China
title_sort randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate‐antacid (gaviscon double action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (gerd) in china
topic Randomised Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26228097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.13334
work_keys_str_mv AT sunj randomisedclinicaltrialtheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofanalginateantacidgaviscondoubleactionversusplacebofordecreasinguppergastrointestinalsymptomsinsymptomaticgastroesophagealrefluxdiseasegerdinchina
AT yangc randomisedclinicaltrialtheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofanalginateantacidgaviscondoubleactionversusplacebofordecreasinguppergastrointestinalsymptomsinsymptomaticgastroesophagealrefluxdiseasegerdinchina
AT zhaoh randomisedclinicaltrialtheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofanalginateantacidgaviscondoubleactionversusplacebofordecreasinguppergastrointestinalsymptomsinsymptomaticgastroesophagealrefluxdiseasegerdinchina
AT zhengp randomisedclinicaltrialtheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofanalginateantacidgaviscondoubleactionversusplacebofordecreasinguppergastrointestinalsymptomsinsymptomaticgastroesophagealrefluxdiseasegerdinchina
AT wilkinsonj randomisedclinicaltrialtheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofanalginateantacidgaviscondoubleactionversusplacebofordecreasinguppergastrointestinalsymptomsinsymptomaticgastroesophagealrefluxdiseasegerdinchina
AT ngb randomisedclinicaltrialtheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofanalginateantacidgaviscondoubleactionversusplacebofordecreasinguppergastrointestinalsymptomsinsymptomaticgastroesophagealrefluxdiseasegerdinchina
AT yuany randomisedclinicaltrialtheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofanalginateantacidgaviscondoubleactionversusplacebofordecreasinguppergastrointestinalsymptomsinsymptomaticgastroesophagealrefluxdiseasegerdinchina