Cargando…

Effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the effect of repeated reprocessing of pediatric tracheostomy tubes (TTs) on biofilm formation. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro microbiological study. METHODS: Pediatric, uncuffed, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) TTs from two different manufacturers (Tracoe Mini and Shiley) were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodney, Jennifer, Ojano‐Dirain, Carolyn P., Antonelli, Patrick J., Silva, Rodrigo C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26267243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.25473
_version_ 1782456543792332800
author Rodney, Jennifer
Ojano‐Dirain, Carolyn P.
Antonelli, Patrick J.
Silva, Rodrigo C.
author_facet Rodney, Jennifer
Ojano‐Dirain, Carolyn P.
Antonelli, Patrick J.
Silva, Rodrigo C.
author_sort Rodney, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the effect of repeated reprocessing of pediatric tracheostomy tubes (TTs) on biofilm formation. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro microbiological study. METHODS: Pediatric, uncuffed, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) TTs from two different manufacturers (Tracoe Mini and Shiley) were reprocessed mechanically with household detergent and soaked in sodium hypochlorite (bleach). Two TTs of each brand were reprocessed 0 (control), 10, or 20 times. Twenty 2‐mm coupons were then obtained from each TT, immersed in human mucus, and cultured with either Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biofilm formation was evaluated with bacterial counts. RESULTS: Bacterial counts of S. aureus for both brands were significantly higher on the TTs that were reprocessed 20 times compared to those that were not reprocessed (Tracoe: P = .040, Shiley: P  <  .0001) or those that were reprocessed 10 times (Tracoe: P = .022, Shiley: P = .0002). There was no difference between controls and TTs reprocessed 10 times (Tracoe: P = .76, Shiley: P = .24). P. aeuruginosa counts were not significantly different among the varying numbers of reprocessing cycles for either Tracoe or Shiley TTs (P = .08 and P = .97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated reprocessing of PVC TTs with detergent and bleach paradoxically promotes S. aureus biofilm development, possibly due to degradation of the tube surface that facilitates bacterial attachment. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal technique and limits of reprocessing TTs in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 126:996–999, 2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5042075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50420752016-10-03 Effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation Rodney, Jennifer Ojano‐Dirain, Carolyn P. Antonelli, Patrick J. Silva, Rodrigo C. Laryngoscope Pediatrics OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the effect of repeated reprocessing of pediatric tracheostomy tubes (TTs) on biofilm formation. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro microbiological study. METHODS: Pediatric, uncuffed, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) TTs from two different manufacturers (Tracoe Mini and Shiley) were reprocessed mechanically with household detergent and soaked in sodium hypochlorite (bleach). Two TTs of each brand were reprocessed 0 (control), 10, or 20 times. Twenty 2‐mm coupons were then obtained from each TT, immersed in human mucus, and cultured with either Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biofilm formation was evaluated with bacterial counts. RESULTS: Bacterial counts of S. aureus for both brands were significantly higher on the TTs that were reprocessed 20 times compared to those that were not reprocessed (Tracoe: P = .040, Shiley: P  <  .0001) or those that were reprocessed 10 times (Tracoe: P = .022, Shiley: P = .0002). There was no difference between controls and TTs reprocessed 10 times (Tracoe: P = .76, Shiley: P = .24). P. aeuruginosa counts were not significantly different among the varying numbers of reprocessing cycles for either Tracoe or Shiley TTs (P = .08 and P = .97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated reprocessing of PVC TTs with detergent and bleach paradoxically promotes S. aureus biofilm development, possibly due to degradation of the tube surface that facilitates bacterial attachment. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal technique and limits of reprocessing TTs in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 126:996–999, 2016 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08-12 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5042075/ /pubmed/26267243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.25473 Text en Laryngoscope published by Wiley on behalf of the American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc, “The Triological Society” and American Laryngological Association (the “Owner”). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Rodney, Jennifer
Ojano‐Dirain, Carolyn P.
Antonelli, Patrick J.
Silva, Rodrigo C.
Effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation
title Effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation
title_full Effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation
title_fullStr Effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation
title_short Effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation
title_sort effect of repeated tracheostomy tube reprocessing on biofilm formation
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26267243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.25473
work_keys_str_mv AT rodneyjennifer effectofrepeatedtracheostomytubereprocessingonbiofilmformation
AT ojanodiraincarolynp effectofrepeatedtracheostomytubereprocessingonbiofilmformation
AT antonellipatrickj effectofrepeatedtracheostomytubereprocessingonbiofilmformation
AT silvarodrigoc effectofrepeatedtracheostomytubereprocessingonbiofilmformation