Cargando…

Determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions

PURPOSE: To estimate the exchange rates of labile (1)H in citrate and spermine, metabolites present in prostatic secretions, to predict the size of the citrate and spermine CEST effects in vivo. METHODS: CEST z‐spectra were acquired at high‐field [11.7 Tesla (T)] from citrate and spermine solutions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basharat, Meer, deSouza, Nandita M., Parkes, Harold G., Payne, Geoffrey S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26467055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25997
_version_ 1782456561877123072
author Basharat, Meer
deSouza, Nandita M.
Parkes, Harold G.
Payne, Geoffrey S.
author_facet Basharat, Meer
deSouza, Nandita M.
Parkes, Harold G.
Payne, Geoffrey S.
author_sort Basharat, Meer
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To estimate the exchange rates of labile (1)H in citrate and spermine, metabolites present in prostatic secretions, to predict the size of the citrate and spermine CEST effects in vivo. METHODS: CEST z‐spectra were acquired at high‐field [11.7 Tesla (T)] from citrate and spermine solutions at physiological pH (6.5) using saturation power 6 μT. CEST was performed at different temperatures to determine exchange regimes (slow, intermediate or fast). For low pH solutions of spermine, exchange rates were estimated from resonance line width, fitting z‐spectra using the Bloch equations incorporating exchange, and using quantifying exchange using saturation time experiments (QUEST). These rates were extrapolated to physiological pH. RESULTS: Citrate showed little CEST effect at pH 6.5 and temperature (T) = 310 K (maximum 0.001% mM(‐1)), indicating fast exchange, whereas spermine showed greater CEST effects (maximum 0.2% mM(‐1)) indicating intermediate‐to‐fast exchange. Extrapolating data acquired from low pH spermine solutions predicts exchange rates at pH 6.5 and T of 310 K of at least 2 × 10(4)s(‐1). CONCLUSION: Citrate and spermine show minimal CEST effects at 11.7T even using high saturation power. These effects would be much less than 2% at clinical field‐strengths due to relatively faster exchange and would be masked by CEST from proteins. Magn Reson Med 76:742–746, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5042183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50421832016-10-03 Determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions Basharat, Meer deSouza, Nandita M. Parkes, Harold G. Payne, Geoffrey S. Magn Reson Med Spectroscopic Methodology—Note PURPOSE: To estimate the exchange rates of labile (1)H in citrate and spermine, metabolites present in prostatic secretions, to predict the size of the citrate and spermine CEST effects in vivo. METHODS: CEST z‐spectra were acquired at high‐field [11.7 Tesla (T)] from citrate and spermine solutions at physiological pH (6.5) using saturation power 6 μT. CEST was performed at different temperatures to determine exchange regimes (slow, intermediate or fast). For low pH solutions of spermine, exchange rates were estimated from resonance line width, fitting z‐spectra using the Bloch equations incorporating exchange, and using quantifying exchange using saturation time experiments (QUEST). These rates were extrapolated to physiological pH. RESULTS: Citrate showed little CEST effect at pH 6.5 and temperature (T) = 310 K (maximum 0.001% mM(‐1)), indicating fast exchange, whereas spermine showed greater CEST effects (maximum 0.2% mM(‐1)) indicating intermediate‐to‐fast exchange. Extrapolating data acquired from low pH spermine solutions predicts exchange rates at pH 6.5 and T of 310 K of at least 2 × 10(4)s(‐1). CONCLUSION: Citrate and spermine show minimal CEST effects at 11.7T even using high saturation power. These effects would be much less than 2% at clinical field‐strengths due to relatively faster exchange and would be masked by CEST from proteins. Magn Reson Med 76:742–746, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-15 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5042183/ /pubmed/26467055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25997 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Spectroscopic Methodology—Note
Basharat, Meer
deSouza, Nandita M.
Parkes, Harold G.
Payne, Geoffrey S.
Determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions
title Determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions
title_full Determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions
title_fullStr Determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions
title_full_unstemmed Determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions
title_short Determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions
title_sort determining the chemical exchange saturation transfer (cest) behavior of citrate and spermine under in vivo conditions
topic Spectroscopic Methodology—Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26467055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25997
work_keys_str_mv AT basharatmeer determiningthechemicalexchangesaturationtransfercestbehaviorofcitrateandspermineunderinvivoconditions
AT desouzananditam determiningthechemicalexchangesaturationtransfercestbehaviorofcitrateandspermineunderinvivoconditions
AT parkesharoldg determiningthechemicalexchangesaturationtransfercestbehaviorofcitrateandspermineunderinvivoconditions
AT paynegeoffreys determiningthechemicalexchangesaturationtransfercestbehaviorofcitrateandspermineunderinvivoconditions