Cargando…

Efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation

In the current study, the overall prevalence and the main underlying etiologies of inflammatory low back pain (ILBP) were determined, and the effectiveness of treatment with sulfasalazine was investigated in patients with inflammatory versus mechanical low back pain (LBP). In a prospective study con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moghimi, Jamileh, Rezaei, Ali Asghar, Ghorbani, Raheb, Razavi, Mohammad Reza, Pahlevan, Daryoush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729768
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S111568
_version_ 1782456562570231808
author Moghimi, Jamileh
Rezaei, Ali Asghar
Ghorbani, Raheb
Razavi, Mohammad Reza
Pahlevan, Daryoush
author_facet Moghimi, Jamileh
Rezaei, Ali Asghar
Ghorbani, Raheb
Razavi, Mohammad Reza
Pahlevan, Daryoush
author_sort Moghimi, Jamileh
collection PubMed
description In the current study, the overall prevalence and the main underlying etiologies of inflammatory low back pain (ILBP) were determined, and the effectiveness of treatment with sulfasalazine was investigated in patients with inflammatory versus mechanical low back pain (LBP). In a prospective study conducted from July 2013 until August 2015, 1,779 consecutive patients within the age range of 18–50 years with a primary complaint of LBP referring to the rheumatology clinics were included. The patients were classified into two distinct groups: those suffering from ILBP (n=118) and those having mechanical LBP (n=1,661). Patients were followed-up for assessing the response rate to sulfasalazine with a mean follow-up time of 16 months. Results showed that among the total number of participants, 6.6% suffered from ILBP. The main underlying diagnoses of ILBP were undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy (USpA) (61.0%) and ankylosing spondylitis (24.6%). During the follow-up period, 3.4% of the participants had an appropriate response to only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 57.6% to sulfasalazine, 26.3% to addition of methotrexate to the previous regimen, and 12.7% to biological agents. Multiple logistic regression results showed that the underlying disease had a significant effect on the sulfasalazine response. The odds for response to treatment was 3.53 times higher in USpA patients compared to other patients (odds ratio =3.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.63–7.68, P=0.001). In 69.4% of the participants, the highest response to sulfasalazine was found, which was related to the underlying USpA. This study found that an adequate response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with ILBP was potentially increased by adding sulfasalazine. Thus, the observed response rate was dependent on the nature of underlying spondyloarthropathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5042186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50421862016-10-11 Efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation Moghimi, Jamileh Rezaei, Ali Asghar Ghorbani, Raheb Razavi, Mohammad Reza Pahlevan, Daryoush Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research In the current study, the overall prevalence and the main underlying etiologies of inflammatory low back pain (ILBP) were determined, and the effectiveness of treatment with sulfasalazine was investigated in patients with inflammatory versus mechanical low back pain (LBP). In a prospective study conducted from July 2013 until August 2015, 1,779 consecutive patients within the age range of 18–50 years with a primary complaint of LBP referring to the rheumatology clinics were included. The patients were classified into two distinct groups: those suffering from ILBP (n=118) and those having mechanical LBP (n=1,661). Patients were followed-up for assessing the response rate to sulfasalazine with a mean follow-up time of 16 months. Results showed that among the total number of participants, 6.6% suffered from ILBP. The main underlying diagnoses of ILBP were undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy (USpA) (61.0%) and ankylosing spondylitis (24.6%). During the follow-up period, 3.4% of the participants had an appropriate response to only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 57.6% to sulfasalazine, 26.3% to addition of methotrexate to the previous regimen, and 12.7% to biological agents. Multiple logistic regression results showed that the underlying disease had a significant effect on the sulfasalazine response. The odds for response to treatment was 3.53 times higher in USpA patients compared to other patients (odds ratio =3.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.63–7.68, P=0.001). In 69.4% of the participants, the highest response to sulfasalazine was found, which was related to the underlying USpA. This study found that an adequate response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with ILBP was potentially increased by adding sulfasalazine. Thus, the observed response rate was dependent on the nature of underlying spondyloarthropathy. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5042186/ /pubmed/27729768 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S111568 Text en © 2016 Moghimi et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Moghimi, Jamileh
Rezaei, Ali Asghar
Ghorbani, Raheb
Razavi, Mohammad Reza
Pahlevan, Daryoush
Efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation
title Efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation
title_full Efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation
title_fullStr Efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation
title_short Efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation
title_sort efficacy of an acquainted drug in the treatment of inflammatory low back pain: sulfasalazine under investigation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729768
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S111568
work_keys_str_mv AT moghimijamileh efficacyofanacquainteddruginthetreatmentofinflammatorylowbackpainsulfasalazineunderinvestigation
AT rezaeialiasghar efficacyofanacquainteddruginthetreatmentofinflammatorylowbackpainsulfasalazineunderinvestigation
AT ghorbaniraheb efficacyofanacquainteddruginthetreatmentofinflammatorylowbackpainsulfasalazineunderinvestigation
AT razavimohammadreza efficacyofanacquainteddruginthetreatmentofinflammatorylowbackpainsulfasalazineunderinvestigation
AT pahlevandaryoush efficacyofanacquainteddruginthetreatmentofinflammatorylowbackpainsulfasalazineunderinvestigation