Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of real-time feedback using an audible pulse in renal Doppler ultrasonography was evaluated. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. Written informed consent was provided by all volunteers at enrollment. The 26 healthy volunteers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Min Hee, Lee, Hae Kyung, Choi, Seo-Youn, Yi, Boem Ha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27685667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163953
_version_ 1782456586882514944
author Lee, Min Hee
Lee, Hae Kyung
Choi, Seo-Youn
Yi, Boem Ha
author_facet Lee, Min Hee
Lee, Hae Kyung
Choi, Seo-Youn
Yi, Boem Ha
author_sort Lee, Min Hee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The effectiveness of real-time feedback using an audible pulse in renal Doppler ultrasonography was evaluated. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. Written informed consent was provided by all volunteers at enrollment. The 26 healthy volunteers enrolled in this study underwent Doppler ultrasound of both kidneys using audible and inaudible pulses in randomized order and at 1-week intervals. Doppler waveforms were obtained at the interlobar or arcuate arteries using a 2-mm Doppler gate. Each session was considered complete when reproducible waveforms were obtained for 5 s in three predefined regions of the kidney. The scan times needed to obtain waveforms of the right and left kidneys were recorded separately. Measurements were compared using a paired t-test and a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: The total recorded Doppler sonography scan time for each kidney ranged from 33 to 146 s. The mean scan time was 56.83 s (right, 58.19 s; left, 55.46 s) in the audible session and 72.58 s (right, 72.08 s; left, 73.08 s) in the inaudible session. The scan times were significantly shorter in the audible than inaudible session (p<0.001), whereas the difference in the scan times between the right and left kidneys was not significant. The order of the sessions had no effect on the total scan time. CONCLUSION: Real-time feedback using an audible pulse may encourage patient cooperation during breath-holding and can shorten the time needed to perform Doppler ultrasonography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5042422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50424222016-10-27 The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography Lee, Min Hee Lee, Hae Kyung Choi, Seo-Youn Yi, Boem Ha PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The effectiveness of real-time feedback using an audible pulse in renal Doppler ultrasonography was evaluated. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. Written informed consent was provided by all volunteers at enrollment. The 26 healthy volunteers enrolled in this study underwent Doppler ultrasound of both kidneys using audible and inaudible pulses in randomized order and at 1-week intervals. Doppler waveforms were obtained at the interlobar or arcuate arteries using a 2-mm Doppler gate. Each session was considered complete when reproducible waveforms were obtained for 5 s in three predefined regions of the kidney. The scan times needed to obtain waveforms of the right and left kidneys were recorded separately. Measurements were compared using a paired t-test and a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: The total recorded Doppler sonography scan time for each kidney ranged from 33 to 146 s. The mean scan time was 56.83 s (right, 58.19 s; left, 55.46 s) in the audible session and 72.58 s (right, 72.08 s; left, 73.08 s) in the inaudible session. The scan times were significantly shorter in the audible than inaudible session (p<0.001), whereas the difference in the scan times between the right and left kidneys was not significant. The order of the sessions had no effect on the total scan time. CONCLUSION: Real-time feedback using an audible pulse may encourage patient cooperation during breath-holding and can shorten the time needed to perform Doppler ultrasonography. Public Library of Science 2016-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5042422/ /pubmed/27685667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163953 Text en © 2016 Lee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Min Hee
Lee, Hae Kyung
Choi, Seo-Youn
Yi, Boem Ha
The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography
title The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography
title_full The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography
title_short The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography
title_sort effectiveness of real-time feedback with an audible pulse: a preliminary study in renal doppler ultrasonography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27685667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163953
work_keys_str_mv AT leeminhee theeffectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography
AT leehaekyung theeffectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography
AT choiseoyoun theeffectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography
AT yiboemha theeffectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography
AT leeminhee effectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography
AT leehaekyung effectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography
AT choiseoyoun effectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography
AT yiboemha effectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography