Cargando…
The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography
PURPOSE: The effectiveness of real-time feedback using an audible pulse in renal Doppler ultrasonography was evaluated. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. Written informed consent was provided by all volunteers at enrollment. The 26 healthy volunteers...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27685667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163953 |
_version_ | 1782456586882514944 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Min Hee Lee, Hae Kyung Choi, Seo-Youn Yi, Boem Ha |
author_facet | Lee, Min Hee Lee, Hae Kyung Choi, Seo-Youn Yi, Boem Ha |
author_sort | Lee, Min Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The effectiveness of real-time feedback using an audible pulse in renal Doppler ultrasonography was evaluated. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. Written informed consent was provided by all volunteers at enrollment. The 26 healthy volunteers enrolled in this study underwent Doppler ultrasound of both kidneys using audible and inaudible pulses in randomized order and at 1-week intervals. Doppler waveforms were obtained at the interlobar or arcuate arteries using a 2-mm Doppler gate. Each session was considered complete when reproducible waveforms were obtained for 5 s in three predefined regions of the kidney. The scan times needed to obtain waveforms of the right and left kidneys were recorded separately. Measurements were compared using a paired t-test and a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: The total recorded Doppler sonography scan time for each kidney ranged from 33 to 146 s. The mean scan time was 56.83 s (right, 58.19 s; left, 55.46 s) in the audible session and 72.58 s (right, 72.08 s; left, 73.08 s) in the inaudible session. The scan times were significantly shorter in the audible than inaudible session (p<0.001), whereas the difference in the scan times between the right and left kidneys was not significant. The order of the sessions had no effect on the total scan time. CONCLUSION: Real-time feedback using an audible pulse may encourage patient cooperation during breath-holding and can shorten the time needed to perform Doppler ultrasonography. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5042422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50424222016-10-27 The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography Lee, Min Hee Lee, Hae Kyung Choi, Seo-Youn Yi, Boem Ha PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The effectiveness of real-time feedback using an audible pulse in renal Doppler ultrasonography was evaluated. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. Written informed consent was provided by all volunteers at enrollment. The 26 healthy volunteers enrolled in this study underwent Doppler ultrasound of both kidneys using audible and inaudible pulses in randomized order and at 1-week intervals. Doppler waveforms were obtained at the interlobar or arcuate arteries using a 2-mm Doppler gate. Each session was considered complete when reproducible waveforms were obtained for 5 s in three predefined regions of the kidney. The scan times needed to obtain waveforms of the right and left kidneys were recorded separately. Measurements were compared using a paired t-test and a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: The total recorded Doppler sonography scan time for each kidney ranged from 33 to 146 s. The mean scan time was 56.83 s (right, 58.19 s; left, 55.46 s) in the audible session and 72.58 s (right, 72.08 s; left, 73.08 s) in the inaudible session. The scan times were significantly shorter in the audible than inaudible session (p<0.001), whereas the difference in the scan times between the right and left kidneys was not significant. The order of the sessions had no effect on the total scan time. CONCLUSION: Real-time feedback using an audible pulse may encourage patient cooperation during breath-holding and can shorten the time needed to perform Doppler ultrasonography. Public Library of Science 2016-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5042422/ /pubmed/27685667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163953 Text en © 2016 Lee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Min Hee Lee, Hae Kyung Choi, Seo-Youn Yi, Boem Ha The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography |
title | The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography |
title_full | The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography |
title_fullStr | The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography |
title_short | The Effectiveness of Real-Time Feedback with an Audible Pulse: A Preliminary Study in Renal Doppler Ultrasonography |
title_sort | effectiveness of real-time feedback with an audible pulse: a preliminary study in renal doppler ultrasonography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27685667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeminhee theeffectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography AT leehaekyung theeffectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography AT choiseoyoun theeffectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography AT yiboemha theeffectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography AT leeminhee effectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography AT leehaekyung effectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography AT choiseoyoun effectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography AT yiboemha effectivenessofrealtimefeedbackwithanaudiblepulseapreliminarystudyinrenaldopplerultrasonography |