Cargando…

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs

BACKGROUND: Limited resources and expanding expectations push all countries and types of health systems to adopt new approaches in priority setting and resources allocation. Despite best efforts, it is difficult to reconcile all competing interests, and trade-offs are inevitable. This is why multi-c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iskrov, Georgi, Miteva-Katrandzhieva, Tsonka, Stefanov, Rumen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747207
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00214
_version_ 1782456672662323200
author Iskrov, Georgi
Miteva-Katrandzhieva, Tsonka
Stefanov, Rumen
author_facet Iskrov, Georgi
Miteva-Katrandzhieva, Tsonka
Stefanov, Rumen
author_sort Iskrov, Georgi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited resources and expanding expectations push all countries and types of health systems to adopt new approaches in priority setting and resources allocation. Despite best efforts, it is difficult to reconcile all competing interests, and trade-offs are inevitable. This is why multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has played a major role in recent uptake of value-based reimbursement. MCDA framework enables exploration of stakeholders’ preferences, as well as explicit organization of broad range of criteria on which real-world decisions are made. Assessment and appraisal of orphan drugs tend to be one of the most complicated health technology assessment (HTA) tasks. Access to market approved orphan therapies remains an issue. Early constructive dialog among rare disease stakeholders and elaboration of orphan drug-tailored decision support tools could set the scene for ongoing accumulation of evidence, as well as for proper reimbursement decision-making. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to create an MCDA value measurement model to assess and appraise orphan drugs. This was achieved by exploring the preferences on decision criteria’s weights and performance scores through a stakeholder-representative survey and a focus group discussion that were both organized in Bulgaria. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Decision criteria that describe the health technology’s characteristics were unanimously agreed as the most important group of reimbursement considerations. This outcome, combined with the high individual weight of disease severity and disease burden criteria, underlined some of the fundamental principles of health care – equity and fairness. Our study proved that strength of evidence may be a key criterion in orphan drug assessment and appraisal. Evidence is used not only to shape reimbursement decision-making but also to lend legitimacy to policies pursued. The need for real-world data on orphan drugs was largely stressed. Improved knowledge on MCDA feasibility and integration to HTA is of paramount importance, as progress in medicine and innovative health technologies should correspond to patient, health-care system, and societal values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5042964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50429642016-10-14 Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs Iskrov, Georgi Miteva-Katrandzhieva, Tsonka Stefanov, Rumen Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Limited resources and expanding expectations push all countries and types of health systems to adopt new approaches in priority setting and resources allocation. Despite best efforts, it is difficult to reconcile all competing interests, and trade-offs are inevitable. This is why multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has played a major role in recent uptake of value-based reimbursement. MCDA framework enables exploration of stakeholders’ preferences, as well as explicit organization of broad range of criteria on which real-world decisions are made. Assessment and appraisal of orphan drugs tend to be one of the most complicated health technology assessment (HTA) tasks. Access to market approved orphan therapies remains an issue. Early constructive dialog among rare disease stakeholders and elaboration of orphan drug-tailored decision support tools could set the scene for ongoing accumulation of evidence, as well as for proper reimbursement decision-making. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to create an MCDA value measurement model to assess and appraise orphan drugs. This was achieved by exploring the preferences on decision criteria’s weights and performance scores through a stakeholder-representative survey and a focus group discussion that were both organized in Bulgaria. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Decision criteria that describe the health technology’s characteristics were unanimously agreed as the most important group of reimbursement considerations. This outcome, combined with the high individual weight of disease severity and disease burden criteria, underlined some of the fundamental principles of health care – equity and fairness. Our study proved that strength of evidence may be a key criterion in orphan drug assessment and appraisal. Evidence is used not only to shape reimbursement decision-making but also to lend legitimacy to policies pursued. The need for real-world data on orphan drugs was largely stressed. Improved knowledge on MCDA feasibility and integration to HTA is of paramount importance, as progress in medicine and innovative health technologies should correspond to patient, health-care system, and societal values. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5042964/ /pubmed/27747207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00214 Text en Copyright © 2016 Iskrov, Miteva-Katrandzhieva and Stefanov. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Iskrov, Georgi
Miteva-Katrandzhieva, Tsonka
Stefanov, Rumen
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs
title Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs
title_full Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs
title_fullStr Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs
title_short Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs
title_sort multi-criteria decision analysis for assessment and appraisal of orphan drugs
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747207
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00214
work_keys_str_mv AT iskrovgeorgi multicriteriadecisionanalysisforassessmentandappraisaloforphandrugs
AT mitevakatrandzhievatsonka multicriteriadecisionanalysisforassessmentandappraisaloforphandrugs
AT stefanovrumen multicriteriadecisionanalysisforassessmentandappraisaloforphandrugs