Cargando…
A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany
PURPOSE: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) represents a significant economic healthcare burden, especially the cost of recurrent disease. Fidaxomicin produced significantly lower recurrence rates and higher sustained cure rates in clinical trials. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and budget i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27062378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-016-0894-y |
_version_ | 1782456674901032960 |
---|---|
author | Watt, Maureen McCrea, Charles Johal, Sukhvinder Posnett, John Nazir, Jameel |
author_facet | Watt, Maureen McCrea, Charles Johal, Sukhvinder Posnett, John Nazir, Jameel |
author_sort | Watt, Maureen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) represents a significant economic healthcare burden, especially the cost of recurrent disease. Fidaxomicin produced significantly lower recurrence rates and higher sustained cure rates in clinical trials. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin in Germany in the first-line treatment of patient subgroups with CDI at increased risk of recurrence. METHODS: A semi-Markov model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin from a payer perspective in Germany. The model cycle length was 10 days. The time horizon was 1 year. Model inputs were probability of clinical cure, 30-day probability of recurrence, and 30-day attributable mortality based on evidence from two randomized controlled trials comparing fidaxomicin and vancomycin in patients with CDI. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, cost per bed-day saved, and cost per recurrence avoided. RESULTS: Despite higher drug acquisition costs, fidaxomicin was dominant in the cancer subgroup (less costly and more effective) and cost-effective in the other subgroups, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios vs. vancomycin ranging from €26,900 to €44,500. Hospitalization costs of the first-line treatment of CDI with fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin were lower in every patient subgroup, resulting in budget impacts ranging from −€1325 (in patients ≥65 years) to −€2438 (in cancer patients). Reductions in the cost of treating recurrence with fidaxomicin ranged from −€574.32 per patient in those receiving concomitant antibiotics to −€1500.68 per patient in renally impaired patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patient subgroups with CDI at increased recurrence risk, fidaxomicin was cost-effective vs. vancomycin, and less costly and more effective in patients with cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s15010-016-0894-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5042976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50429762016-10-14 A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany Watt, Maureen McCrea, Charles Johal, Sukhvinder Posnett, John Nazir, Jameel Infection Original Paper PURPOSE: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) represents a significant economic healthcare burden, especially the cost of recurrent disease. Fidaxomicin produced significantly lower recurrence rates and higher sustained cure rates in clinical trials. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin in Germany in the first-line treatment of patient subgroups with CDI at increased risk of recurrence. METHODS: A semi-Markov model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin from a payer perspective in Germany. The model cycle length was 10 days. The time horizon was 1 year. Model inputs were probability of clinical cure, 30-day probability of recurrence, and 30-day attributable mortality based on evidence from two randomized controlled trials comparing fidaxomicin and vancomycin in patients with CDI. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, cost per bed-day saved, and cost per recurrence avoided. RESULTS: Despite higher drug acquisition costs, fidaxomicin was dominant in the cancer subgroup (less costly and more effective) and cost-effective in the other subgroups, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios vs. vancomycin ranging from €26,900 to €44,500. Hospitalization costs of the first-line treatment of CDI with fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin were lower in every patient subgroup, resulting in budget impacts ranging from −€1325 (in patients ≥65 years) to −€2438 (in cancer patients). Reductions in the cost of treating recurrence with fidaxomicin ranged from −€574.32 per patient in those receiving concomitant antibiotics to −€1500.68 per patient in renally impaired patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patient subgroups with CDI at increased recurrence risk, fidaxomicin was cost-effective vs. vancomycin, and less costly and more effective in patients with cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s15010-016-0894-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-09 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5042976/ /pubmed/27062378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-016-0894-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Watt, Maureen McCrea, Charles Johal, Sukhvinder Posnett, John Nazir, Jameel A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany |
title | A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany |
title_full | A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany |
title_fullStr | A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany |
title_short | A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with clostridium difficile infection (cdi) in germany |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27062378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-016-0894-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wattmaureen acosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT mccreacharles acosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT johalsukhvinder acosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT posnettjohn acosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT nazirjameel acosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT wattmaureen costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT mccreacharles costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT johalsukhvinder costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT posnettjohn costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany AT nazirjameel costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysisoffirstlinefidaxomicinforpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiingermany |