Cargando…
Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus
Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a non-destructive imaging technique used for the assessment of composition and structure of articular cartilage and meniscus. Due to structural and compositional differences between these tissues, diffusion and distribution of contrast agents may diffe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1629-z |
_version_ | 1782456677194268672 |
---|---|
author | Honkanen, Juuso T. J. Turunen, Mikael J. Freedman, Jonathan D. Saarakkala, Simo Grinstaff, Mark W. Ylärinne, Janne H. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Töyräs, Juha |
author_facet | Honkanen, Juuso T. J. Turunen, Mikael J. Freedman, Jonathan D. Saarakkala, Simo Grinstaff, Mark W. Ylärinne, Janne H. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Töyräs, Juha |
author_sort | Honkanen, Juuso T. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a non-destructive imaging technique used for the assessment of composition and structure of articular cartilage and meniscus. Due to structural and compositional differences between these tissues, diffusion and distribution of contrast agents may differ in cartilage and meniscus. The aim of this study is to determine the diffusion kinematics of a novel iodine based cationic contrast agent (CA(2+)) in cartilage and meniscus. Cylindrical cartilage and meniscus samples (d = 6 mm, h ≈ 2 mm) were harvested from healthy bovine knee joints (n = 10), immersed in isotonic cationic contrast agent (20 mgI/mL), and imaged using a micro-CT scanner at 26 time points up to 48 h. Subsequently, normalized X-ray attenuation and contrast agent diffusion flux, as well as water, collagen and proteoglycan (PG) contents in the tissues were determined. The contrast agent distributions within cartilage and meniscus were different. In addition, the normalized attenuation and diffusion flux were higher (p < 0.05) in cartilage. Based on these results, diffusion kinematics vary between cartilage and meniscus. These tissue specific variations can affect the interpretation of CECT images and should be considered when cartilage and meniscus are assessed simultaneously. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5042996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50429962016-10-14 Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus Honkanen, Juuso T. J. Turunen, Mikael J. Freedman, Jonathan D. Saarakkala, Simo Grinstaff, Mark W. Ylärinne, Janne H. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Töyräs, Juha Ann Biomed Eng Article Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a non-destructive imaging technique used for the assessment of composition and structure of articular cartilage and meniscus. Due to structural and compositional differences between these tissues, diffusion and distribution of contrast agents may differ in cartilage and meniscus. The aim of this study is to determine the diffusion kinematics of a novel iodine based cationic contrast agent (CA(2+)) in cartilage and meniscus. Cylindrical cartilage and meniscus samples (d = 6 mm, h ≈ 2 mm) were harvested from healthy bovine knee joints (n = 10), immersed in isotonic cationic contrast agent (20 mgI/mL), and imaged using a micro-CT scanner at 26 time points up to 48 h. Subsequently, normalized X-ray attenuation and contrast agent diffusion flux, as well as water, collagen and proteoglycan (PG) contents in the tissues were determined. The contrast agent distributions within cartilage and meniscus were different. In addition, the normalized attenuation and diffusion flux were higher (p < 0.05) in cartilage. Based on these results, diffusion kinematics vary between cartilage and meniscus. These tissue specific variations can affect the interpretation of CECT images and should be considered when cartilage and meniscus are assessed simultaneously. Springer US 2016-04-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5042996/ /pubmed/27129372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1629-z Text en © Biomedical Engineering Society 2016 |
spellingShingle | Article Honkanen, Juuso T. J. Turunen, Mikael J. Freedman, Jonathan D. Saarakkala, Simo Grinstaff, Mark W. Ylärinne, Janne H. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Töyräs, Juha Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus |
title | Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus |
title_full | Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus |
title_fullStr | Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus |
title_full_unstemmed | Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus |
title_short | Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus |
title_sort | cationic contrast agent diffusion differs between cartilage and meniscus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1629-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT honkanenjuusotj cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus AT turunenmikaelj cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus AT freedmanjonathand cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus AT saarakkalasimo cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus AT grinstaffmarkw cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus AT ylarinnejanneh cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus AT jurvelinjukkas cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus AT toyrasjuha cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus |