Cargando…

Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus

Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a non-destructive imaging technique used for the assessment of composition and structure of articular cartilage and meniscus. Due to structural and compositional differences between these tissues, diffusion and distribution of contrast agents may diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Honkanen, Juuso T. J., Turunen, Mikael J., Freedman, Jonathan D., Saarakkala, Simo, Grinstaff, Mark W., Ylärinne, Janne H., Jurvelin, Jukka S., Töyräs, Juha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1629-z
_version_ 1782456677194268672
author Honkanen, Juuso T. J.
Turunen, Mikael J.
Freedman, Jonathan D.
Saarakkala, Simo
Grinstaff, Mark W.
Ylärinne, Janne H.
Jurvelin, Jukka S.
Töyräs, Juha
author_facet Honkanen, Juuso T. J.
Turunen, Mikael J.
Freedman, Jonathan D.
Saarakkala, Simo
Grinstaff, Mark W.
Ylärinne, Janne H.
Jurvelin, Jukka S.
Töyräs, Juha
author_sort Honkanen, Juuso T. J.
collection PubMed
description Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a non-destructive imaging technique used for the assessment of composition and structure of articular cartilage and meniscus. Due to structural and compositional differences between these tissues, diffusion and distribution of contrast agents may differ in cartilage and meniscus. The aim of this study is to determine the diffusion kinematics of a novel iodine based cationic contrast agent (CA(2+)) in cartilage and meniscus. Cylindrical cartilage and meniscus samples (d = 6 mm, h ≈ 2 mm) were harvested from healthy bovine knee joints (n = 10), immersed in isotonic cationic contrast agent (20 mgI/mL), and imaged using a micro-CT scanner at 26 time points up to 48 h. Subsequently, normalized X-ray attenuation and contrast agent diffusion flux, as well as water, collagen and proteoglycan (PG) contents in the tissues were determined. The contrast agent distributions within cartilage and meniscus were different. In addition, the normalized attenuation and diffusion flux were higher (p < 0.05) in cartilage. Based on these results, diffusion kinematics vary between cartilage and meniscus. These tissue specific variations can affect the interpretation of CECT images and should be considered when cartilage and meniscus are assessed simultaneously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5042996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50429962016-10-14 Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus Honkanen, Juuso T. J. Turunen, Mikael J. Freedman, Jonathan D. Saarakkala, Simo Grinstaff, Mark W. Ylärinne, Janne H. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Töyräs, Juha Ann Biomed Eng Article Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a non-destructive imaging technique used for the assessment of composition and structure of articular cartilage and meniscus. Due to structural and compositional differences between these tissues, diffusion and distribution of contrast agents may differ in cartilage and meniscus. The aim of this study is to determine the diffusion kinematics of a novel iodine based cationic contrast agent (CA(2+)) in cartilage and meniscus. Cylindrical cartilage and meniscus samples (d = 6 mm, h ≈ 2 mm) were harvested from healthy bovine knee joints (n = 10), immersed in isotonic cationic contrast agent (20 mgI/mL), and imaged using a micro-CT scanner at 26 time points up to 48 h. Subsequently, normalized X-ray attenuation and contrast agent diffusion flux, as well as water, collagen and proteoglycan (PG) contents in the tissues were determined. The contrast agent distributions within cartilage and meniscus were different. In addition, the normalized attenuation and diffusion flux were higher (p < 0.05) in cartilage. Based on these results, diffusion kinematics vary between cartilage and meniscus. These tissue specific variations can affect the interpretation of CECT images and should be considered when cartilage and meniscus are assessed simultaneously. Springer US 2016-04-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5042996/ /pubmed/27129372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1629-z Text en © Biomedical Engineering Society 2016
spellingShingle Article
Honkanen, Juuso T. J.
Turunen, Mikael J.
Freedman, Jonathan D.
Saarakkala, Simo
Grinstaff, Mark W.
Ylärinne, Janne H.
Jurvelin, Jukka S.
Töyräs, Juha
Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus
title Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus
title_full Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus
title_fullStr Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus
title_full_unstemmed Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus
title_short Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus
title_sort cationic contrast agent diffusion differs between cartilage and meniscus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5042996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1629-z
work_keys_str_mv AT honkanenjuusotj cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus
AT turunenmikaelj cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus
AT freedmanjonathand cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus
AT saarakkalasimo cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus
AT grinstaffmarkw cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus
AT ylarinnejanneh cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus
AT jurvelinjukkas cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus
AT toyrasjuha cationiccontrastagentdiffusiondiffersbetweencartilageandmeniscus