Cargando…
The natural selection of bad science
Poor research design and data analysis encourage false-positive findings. Such poor methods persist despite perennial calls for improvement, suggesting that they result from something more than just misunderstanding. The persistence of poor methods results partly from incentives that favour them, le...
Autores principales: | Smaldino, Paul E., McElreath, Richard |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5043322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Replication of the natural selection of bad science
por: Kohrt, Florian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Correction to: ‘The natural selection of bad science’ (2016) by Paul E. Smaldino and Richard McElreath
por: Smaldino, Paul E., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science
por: Smaldino, Paul E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Dynamic social learning in temporally and spatially variable environments
por: Deffner, Dominik, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery
por: McElreath, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2015)