Cargando…
Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students?
BACKGROUND: The assessment of patient safety culture refers mainly to surveys exploring the perceptions of health professionals in hospitals. These surveys have less relevance when considering the assessment of the patient safety culture of medical students, especially at university or medical schoo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5043596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0778-y |
_version_ | 1782456783600615424 |
---|---|
author | Chaneliere, M. Jacquet, F. Occelli, P. Touzet, S. Siranyan, V. Colin, C. |
author_facet | Chaneliere, M. Jacquet, F. Occelli, P. Touzet, S. Siranyan, V. Colin, C. |
author_sort | Chaneliere, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The assessment of patient safety culture refers mainly to surveys exploring the perceptions of health professionals in hospitals. These surveys have less relevance when considering the assessment of the patient safety culture of medical students, especially at university or medical school. They are indeed not fully integrated in care units and constitute a heterogeneous population. This work aimed to find appropriate assessment tools of the patient safety culture of medical students. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature. Surveys related to a care unit were excluded. A typology of the patient safety culture of medical students was built from the included surveys. RESULTS: Eighteen surveys were included. In our typology of patient safety culture of medical students (15 dimensions), the number of dimensions explored by survey (n) ranged from 1 to 12, with 6 “specialized” tools (n ≤ 4) and 12 “global” tools (N ≥ 5). These surveys have explored: knowledge about patient safety, acknowledgment of the inevitability of human error, the lack of skills as the main source of errors, the errors reporting systems, disclosure of medical errors to others health professionals or patients, teamwork and patient involvement to improve safety in care. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using Wetzel’s survey for making an overall assessment of the patient safety culture of medical students at university. In a specific purpose—e.g. to assess an educational program on medical error disclosure—the authors recommend to determine which dimensions of patient safety will be taught, to select the best assessment tool. Learning on patient safety should however be considered beyond the university. International translations of tools are required to create databases allowing comparative studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0778-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5043596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50435962016-10-05 Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students? Chaneliere, M. Jacquet, F. Occelli, P. Touzet, S. Siranyan, V. Colin, C. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The assessment of patient safety culture refers mainly to surveys exploring the perceptions of health professionals in hospitals. These surveys have less relevance when considering the assessment of the patient safety culture of medical students, especially at university or medical school. They are indeed not fully integrated in care units and constitute a heterogeneous population. This work aimed to find appropriate assessment tools of the patient safety culture of medical students. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature. Surveys related to a care unit were excluded. A typology of the patient safety culture of medical students was built from the included surveys. RESULTS: Eighteen surveys were included. In our typology of patient safety culture of medical students (15 dimensions), the number of dimensions explored by survey (n) ranged from 1 to 12, with 6 “specialized” tools (n ≤ 4) and 12 “global” tools (N ≥ 5). These surveys have explored: knowledge about patient safety, acknowledgment of the inevitability of human error, the lack of skills as the main source of errors, the errors reporting systems, disclosure of medical errors to others health professionals or patients, teamwork and patient involvement to improve safety in care. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using Wetzel’s survey for making an overall assessment of the patient safety culture of medical students at university. In a specific purpose—e.g. to assess an educational program on medical error disclosure—the authors recommend to determine which dimensions of patient safety will be taught, to select the best assessment tool. Learning on patient safety should however be considered beyond the university. International translations of tools are required to create databases allowing comparative studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0778-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5043596/ /pubmed/27687526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0778-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chaneliere, M. Jacquet, F. Occelli, P. Touzet, S. Siranyan, V. Colin, C. Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students? |
title | Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students? |
title_full | Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students? |
title_fullStr | Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students? |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students? |
title_short | Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students? |
title_sort | assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5043596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0778-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanelierem assessmentofpatientsafetyculturewhattoolsformedicalstudents AT jacquetf assessmentofpatientsafetyculturewhattoolsformedicalstudents AT occellip assessmentofpatientsafetyculturewhattoolsformedicalstudents AT touzets assessmentofpatientsafetyculturewhattoolsformedicalstudents AT siranyanv assessmentofpatientsafetyculturewhattoolsformedicalstudents AT colinc assessmentofpatientsafetyculturewhattoolsformedicalstudents |