Cargando…

The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Low back pain and pelvic girth pain are common in pregnancy and women commonly utilize complementary manual therapies such as massage, spinal manipulation, chiropractic, and osteopathy to manage their symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematically review was to critically appraise a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Helen, Cramer, Holger, Sundberg, Tobias, Ward, Lesley, Adams, Jon, Moore, Craig, Sibbritt, David, Lauche, Romy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5044890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004723
_version_ 1782457012695597056
author Hall, Helen
Cramer, Holger
Sundberg, Tobias
Ward, Lesley
Adams, Jon
Moore, Craig
Sibbritt, David
Lauche, Romy
author_facet Hall, Helen
Cramer, Holger
Sundberg, Tobias
Ward, Lesley
Adams, Jon
Moore, Craig
Sibbritt, David
Lauche, Romy
author_sort Hall, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain and pelvic girth pain are common in pregnancy and women commonly utilize complementary manual therapies such as massage, spinal manipulation, chiropractic, and osteopathy to manage their symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematically review was to critically appraise and synthesize the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual therapies for managing pregnancy-related low back and pelvic pain. METHODS: Seven databases were searched from their inception until April 2015 for randomized controlled trials. Studies investigating the effectiveness of massage and chiropractic and osteopathic therapies were included. The study population was pregnant women of any age and at any time during the antenatal period. Study selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias were conducted by 2 reviewers independently, using the Cochrane tool. Separate meta-analyses were conducted to compare manual therapies to different control interventions. RESULTS: Out of 348 nonduplicate records, 11 articles reporting on 10 studies on a total of 1198 pregnant women were included in this meta-analysis. The therapeutic interventions predominantly involved massage and osteopathic manipulative therapy. Meta-analyses found positive effects for manual therapy on pain intensity when compared to usual care and relaxation but not when compared to sham interventions. Acceptability did not differ between manual therapy and usual care or sham interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently limited evidence to support the use of complementary manual therapies as an option for managing low back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Considering the lack of effect compared to sham interventions, further high-quality research is needed to determine causal effects, the influence of the therapist on the perceived effectiveness of treatments, and adequate dose–response of complementary manual therapies on low back and pelvic pain outcomes during pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5044890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50448902016-10-06 The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis Hall, Helen Cramer, Holger Sundberg, Tobias Ward, Lesley Adams, Jon Moore, Craig Sibbritt, David Lauche, Romy Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: Low back pain and pelvic girth pain are common in pregnancy and women commonly utilize complementary manual therapies such as massage, spinal manipulation, chiropractic, and osteopathy to manage their symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematically review was to critically appraise and synthesize the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual therapies for managing pregnancy-related low back and pelvic pain. METHODS: Seven databases were searched from their inception until April 2015 for randomized controlled trials. Studies investigating the effectiveness of massage and chiropractic and osteopathic therapies were included. The study population was pregnant women of any age and at any time during the antenatal period. Study selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias were conducted by 2 reviewers independently, using the Cochrane tool. Separate meta-analyses were conducted to compare manual therapies to different control interventions. RESULTS: Out of 348 nonduplicate records, 11 articles reporting on 10 studies on a total of 1198 pregnant women were included in this meta-analysis. The therapeutic interventions predominantly involved massage and osteopathic manipulative therapy. Meta-analyses found positive effects for manual therapy on pain intensity when compared to usual care and relaxation but not when compared to sham interventions. Acceptability did not differ between manual therapy and usual care or sham interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently limited evidence to support the use of complementary manual therapies as an option for managing low back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Considering the lack of effect compared to sham interventions, further high-quality research is needed to determine causal effects, the influence of the therapist on the perceived effectiveness of treatments, and adequate dose–response of complementary manual therapies on low back and pelvic pain outcomes during pregnancy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5044890/ /pubmed/27661020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004723 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Hall, Helen
Cramer, Holger
Sundberg, Tobias
Ward, Lesley
Adams, Jon
Moore, Craig
Sibbritt, David
Lauche, Romy
The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5044890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004723
work_keys_str_mv AT hallhelen theeffectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT cramerholger theeffectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT sundbergtobias theeffectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT wardlesley theeffectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT adamsjon theeffectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT moorecraig theeffectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT sibbrittdavid theeffectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT laucheromy theeffectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT hallhelen effectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT cramerholger effectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT sundbergtobias effectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT wardlesley effectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT adamsjon effectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT moorecraig effectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT sibbrittdavid effectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT laucheromy effectivenessofcomplementarymanualtherapiesforpregnancyrelatedbackandpelvicpainasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis