Cargando…

Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment

BACKGROUND: Most research on how to enhance response rates in physician surveys has been done using paper surveys. Uncertainties remain regarding how to enhance response rates in Internet-based surveys. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a low-cost nonmonetary incentive and paper mail reminders (f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, David A, Wittich, Christopher M, Daniels, Wendlyn L, West, Colin P, Harris, Ann M, Beebe, Timothy J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27637296
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6318
_version_ 1782457131830607872
author Cook, David A
Wittich, Christopher M
Daniels, Wendlyn L
West, Colin P
Harris, Ann M
Beebe, Timothy J
author_facet Cook, David A
Wittich, Christopher M
Daniels, Wendlyn L
West, Colin P
Harris, Ann M
Beebe, Timothy J
author_sort Cook, David A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most research on how to enhance response rates in physician surveys has been done using paper surveys. Uncertainties remain regarding how to enhance response rates in Internet-based surveys. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a low-cost nonmonetary incentive and paper mail reminders (formal letter and postcard) on response rates in Internet-based physician surveys. METHODS: We executed a factorial-design randomized experiment while conducting a nationally representative Internet-based physician survey. We invited 3966 physicians (randomly selected from a commercial database of all licensed US physicians) via email to complete an Internet-based survey. We used 2 randomly assigned email messages: one message offered a book upon survey completion, whereas the other did not mention the book but was otherwise identical. All nonrespondents received several email reminders. Some physicians were further assigned at random to receive 1 reminder via paper mail (either a postcard or a letter) or no paper reminder. The primary outcome of this study was the survey response rate. RESULTS: Of the 3966 physicians who were invited, 451 (11.4%) responded to at least one survey question and 336 (8.5%) completed the entire survey. Of those who were offered a book, 345/2973 (11.6%) responded compared with 106/993 (10.7%) who were not offered a book (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.38, P=.42). Regarding the paper mail reminder, 168/1572 (10.7%) letter recipients, 148/1561 (9.5%) postcard recipients, and 69/767 (9.0%) email-only recipients responded (P=.35). The response rate for those receiving letters or postcards was similar (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44, P=.26). CONCLUSIONS: Offering a modest nonmonetary incentive and sending a paper reminder did not improve survey response rate. Further research on how to enhance response rates in Internet-based physician surveys is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5045523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50455232016-10-18 Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment Cook, David A Wittich, Christopher M Daniels, Wendlyn L West, Colin P Harris, Ann M Beebe, Timothy J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Most research on how to enhance response rates in physician surveys has been done using paper surveys. Uncertainties remain regarding how to enhance response rates in Internet-based surveys. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a low-cost nonmonetary incentive and paper mail reminders (formal letter and postcard) on response rates in Internet-based physician surveys. METHODS: We executed a factorial-design randomized experiment while conducting a nationally representative Internet-based physician survey. We invited 3966 physicians (randomly selected from a commercial database of all licensed US physicians) via email to complete an Internet-based survey. We used 2 randomly assigned email messages: one message offered a book upon survey completion, whereas the other did not mention the book but was otherwise identical. All nonrespondents received several email reminders. Some physicians were further assigned at random to receive 1 reminder via paper mail (either a postcard or a letter) or no paper reminder. The primary outcome of this study was the survey response rate. RESULTS: Of the 3966 physicians who were invited, 451 (11.4%) responded to at least one survey question and 336 (8.5%) completed the entire survey. Of those who were offered a book, 345/2973 (11.6%) responded compared with 106/993 (10.7%) who were not offered a book (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.38, P=.42). Regarding the paper mail reminder, 168/1572 (10.7%) letter recipients, 148/1561 (9.5%) postcard recipients, and 69/767 (9.0%) email-only recipients responded (P=.35). The response rate for those receiving letters or postcards was similar (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44, P=.26). CONCLUSIONS: Offering a modest nonmonetary incentive and sending a paper reminder did not improve survey response rate. Further research on how to enhance response rates in Internet-based physician surveys is needed. JMIR Publications 2016-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5045523/ /pubmed/27637296 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6318 Text en ©David A Cook, Christopher M Wittich, Wendlyn L Daniels, Colin P West, Ann M Harris, Timothy J Beebe. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 16.09.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cook, David A
Wittich, Christopher M
Daniels, Wendlyn L
West, Colin P
Harris, Ann M
Beebe, Timothy J
Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment
title Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment
title_full Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment
title_fullStr Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment
title_short Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment
title_sort incentive and reminder strategies to improve response rate for internet-based physician surveys: a randomized experiment
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27637296
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6318
work_keys_str_mv AT cookdavida incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment
AT wittichchristopherm incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment
AT danielswendlynl incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment
AT westcolinp incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment
AT harrisannm incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment
AT beebetimothyj incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment