Cargando…
Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment
BACKGROUND: Most research on how to enhance response rates in physician surveys has been done using paper surveys. Uncertainties remain regarding how to enhance response rates in Internet-based surveys. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a low-cost nonmonetary incentive and paper mail reminders (f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27637296 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6318 |
_version_ | 1782457131830607872 |
---|---|
author | Cook, David A Wittich, Christopher M Daniels, Wendlyn L West, Colin P Harris, Ann M Beebe, Timothy J |
author_facet | Cook, David A Wittich, Christopher M Daniels, Wendlyn L West, Colin P Harris, Ann M Beebe, Timothy J |
author_sort | Cook, David A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most research on how to enhance response rates in physician surveys has been done using paper surveys. Uncertainties remain regarding how to enhance response rates in Internet-based surveys. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a low-cost nonmonetary incentive and paper mail reminders (formal letter and postcard) on response rates in Internet-based physician surveys. METHODS: We executed a factorial-design randomized experiment while conducting a nationally representative Internet-based physician survey. We invited 3966 physicians (randomly selected from a commercial database of all licensed US physicians) via email to complete an Internet-based survey. We used 2 randomly assigned email messages: one message offered a book upon survey completion, whereas the other did not mention the book but was otherwise identical. All nonrespondents received several email reminders. Some physicians were further assigned at random to receive 1 reminder via paper mail (either a postcard or a letter) or no paper reminder. The primary outcome of this study was the survey response rate. RESULTS: Of the 3966 physicians who were invited, 451 (11.4%) responded to at least one survey question and 336 (8.5%) completed the entire survey. Of those who were offered a book, 345/2973 (11.6%) responded compared with 106/993 (10.7%) who were not offered a book (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.38, P=.42). Regarding the paper mail reminder, 168/1572 (10.7%) letter recipients, 148/1561 (9.5%) postcard recipients, and 69/767 (9.0%) email-only recipients responded (P=.35). The response rate for those receiving letters or postcards was similar (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44, P=.26). CONCLUSIONS: Offering a modest nonmonetary incentive and sending a paper reminder did not improve survey response rate. Further research on how to enhance response rates in Internet-based physician surveys is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5045523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50455232016-10-18 Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment Cook, David A Wittich, Christopher M Daniels, Wendlyn L West, Colin P Harris, Ann M Beebe, Timothy J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Most research on how to enhance response rates in physician surveys has been done using paper surveys. Uncertainties remain regarding how to enhance response rates in Internet-based surveys. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a low-cost nonmonetary incentive and paper mail reminders (formal letter and postcard) on response rates in Internet-based physician surveys. METHODS: We executed a factorial-design randomized experiment while conducting a nationally representative Internet-based physician survey. We invited 3966 physicians (randomly selected from a commercial database of all licensed US physicians) via email to complete an Internet-based survey. We used 2 randomly assigned email messages: one message offered a book upon survey completion, whereas the other did not mention the book but was otherwise identical. All nonrespondents received several email reminders. Some physicians were further assigned at random to receive 1 reminder via paper mail (either a postcard or a letter) or no paper reminder. The primary outcome of this study was the survey response rate. RESULTS: Of the 3966 physicians who were invited, 451 (11.4%) responded to at least one survey question and 336 (8.5%) completed the entire survey. Of those who were offered a book, 345/2973 (11.6%) responded compared with 106/993 (10.7%) who were not offered a book (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.38, P=.42). Regarding the paper mail reminder, 168/1572 (10.7%) letter recipients, 148/1561 (9.5%) postcard recipients, and 69/767 (9.0%) email-only recipients responded (P=.35). The response rate for those receiving letters or postcards was similar (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44, P=.26). CONCLUSIONS: Offering a modest nonmonetary incentive and sending a paper reminder did not improve survey response rate. Further research on how to enhance response rates in Internet-based physician surveys is needed. JMIR Publications 2016-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5045523/ /pubmed/27637296 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6318 Text en ©David A Cook, Christopher M Wittich, Wendlyn L Daniels, Colin P West, Ann M Harris, Timothy J Beebe. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 16.09.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cook, David A Wittich, Christopher M Daniels, Wendlyn L West, Colin P Harris, Ann M Beebe, Timothy J Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment |
title | Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment |
title_full | Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment |
title_fullStr | Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment |
title_short | Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment |
title_sort | incentive and reminder strategies to improve response rate for internet-based physician surveys: a randomized experiment |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27637296 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookdavida incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment AT wittichchristopherm incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment AT danielswendlynl incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment AT westcolinp incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment AT harrisannm incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment AT beebetimothyj incentiveandreminderstrategiestoimproveresponserateforinternetbasedphysiciansurveysarandomizedexperiment |