Cargando…
Realist trials and the testing of context-mechanism-outcome configurations: a response to Van Belle et al.
BACKGROUND: Van Belle et al. argue that our attempt to pursue realist evaluation via a randomised trial will be fruitless because we misunderstand realist ontology (confusing intervention mechanisms with intervention activities and with statistical mediation analyses) and because RCTs cannot compreh...
Autores principales: | Bonell, Chris, Warren, Emily, Fletcher, Adam, Viner, Russell |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1613-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example
por: Jamal, Farah, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Locating and testing the healthy context paradox: examples from the INCLUSIVE trial
por: Melendez-Torres, G. J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Response to Bell et al.
por: Weiner, Orion
Publicado: (2014) -
Realist complex intervention science: Applying realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions
por: Fletcher, Adam, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Correction to: Using qualitative research to explore intervention mechanisms: findings from the trial of the learning together whole-school health intervention
por: Warren, Emily, et al.
Publicado: (2020)