Cargando…

In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment

BACKGROUND: Complete removal of old filling material during root canal retreatment is fundamental for predictable cleaning and shaping of canal anatomy. Most of the retreatment methods tested in earlier studies have shown inability to achieve complete removal of root canal filling. Therefore the aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, Mercy, Ahlawat, Jyoti, Malhotra, Amit, Rao, Murali, Sharma, Abhimanyu, Talwar, Sangeeta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703601
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52488
_version_ 1782457166886600704
author Joseph, Mercy
Ahlawat, Jyoti
Malhotra, Amit
Rao, Murali
Sharma, Abhimanyu
Talwar, Sangeeta
author_facet Joseph, Mercy
Ahlawat, Jyoti
Malhotra, Amit
Rao, Murali
Sharma, Abhimanyu
Talwar, Sangeeta
author_sort Joseph, Mercy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complete removal of old filling material during root canal retreatment is fundamental for predictable cleaning and shaping of canal anatomy. Most of the retreatment methods tested in earlier studies have shown inability to achieve complete removal of root canal filling. Therefore the aim of this investigation was to assess the efficacy of three different rotary nickel titanium retreatment systems and Hedstrom files in removing filling material from root canals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty extracted mandibular premolars were decoronated to leave 15 mm root. Specimen were hand instrumented and obturated using gutta percha and AH plus root canal sealer. After storage period of two weeks, roots were retreated with three (Protaper retreatment files, Mtwo retreatment files, NRT GPR) rotary retreatment instrument systems and Hedstroem files. Subsequently, samples were sectioned longitudinally and examined under stereomicroscope. Digital images were recorded and evaluated using Digital Image Analysing Software. The retreatment time was recorded for each tooth using a stopwatch. The area of canal and the residual filling material was recorded in mm2 and the percentage of remaining filling material on canal walls was calculated. Data was analysed using ANOVA test. RESULTS: Significantly less amount of residual filling material was present in protaper and Mtwo instrumented teeth (p < 0.05) compared to NRT GPR and Hedstrom files group. Protaper instruments also required lesser time during removal of filling material followed by Mtwo instruments, NRT GPR files and Hedstrom files. CONCLUSIONS: None of the instruments were able to remove the filling material completely from root canal. Protaper universal retreatment system and Mtwo retreatment files were more efficient and faster compared to NRT GPR fles and Hedstrom files. Key words:Gutta-percha removal, nickel titanium, root canal retreatment, rotary instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5045680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50456802016-10-04 In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment Joseph, Mercy Ahlawat, Jyoti Malhotra, Amit Rao, Murali Sharma, Abhimanyu Talwar, Sangeeta J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Complete removal of old filling material during root canal retreatment is fundamental for predictable cleaning and shaping of canal anatomy. Most of the retreatment methods tested in earlier studies have shown inability to achieve complete removal of root canal filling. Therefore the aim of this investigation was to assess the efficacy of three different rotary nickel titanium retreatment systems and Hedstrom files in removing filling material from root canals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty extracted mandibular premolars were decoronated to leave 15 mm root. Specimen were hand instrumented and obturated using gutta percha and AH plus root canal sealer. After storage period of two weeks, roots were retreated with three (Protaper retreatment files, Mtwo retreatment files, NRT GPR) rotary retreatment instrument systems and Hedstroem files. Subsequently, samples were sectioned longitudinally and examined under stereomicroscope. Digital images were recorded and evaluated using Digital Image Analysing Software. The retreatment time was recorded for each tooth using a stopwatch. The area of canal and the residual filling material was recorded in mm2 and the percentage of remaining filling material on canal walls was calculated. Data was analysed using ANOVA test. RESULTS: Significantly less amount of residual filling material was present in protaper and Mtwo instrumented teeth (p < 0.05) compared to NRT GPR and Hedstrom files group. Protaper instruments also required lesser time during removal of filling material followed by Mtwo instruments, NRT GPR files and Hedstrom files. CONCLUSIONS: None of the instruments were able to remove the filling material completely from root canal. Protaper universal retreatment system and Mtwo retreatment files were more efficient and faster compared to NRT GPR fles and Hedstrom files. Key words:Gutta-percha removal, nickel titanium, root canal retreatment, rotary instruments. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5045680/ /pubmed/27703601 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52488 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Joseph, Mercy
Ahlawat, Jyoti
Malhotra, Amit
Rao, Murali
Sharma, Abhimanyu
Talwar, Sangeeta
In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment
title In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment
title_full In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment
title_fullStr In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment
title_full_unstemmed In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment
title_short In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment
title_sort in vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703601
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52488
work_keys_str_mv AT josephmercy invitroevaluationofefficacyofdifferentrotaryinstrumentsystemsforguttapercharemovalduringrootcanalretreatment
AT ahlawatjyoti invitroevaluationofefficacyofdifferentrotaryinstrumentsystemsforguttapercharemovalduringrootcanalretreatment
AT malhotraamit invitroevaluationofefficacyofdifferentrotaryinstrumentsystemsforguttapercharemovalduringrootcanalretreatment
AT raomurali invitroevaluationofefficacyofdifferentrotaryinstrumentsystemsforguttapercharemovalduringrootcanalretreatment
AT sharmaabhimanyu invitroevaluationofefficacyofdifferentrotaryinstrumentsystemsforguttapercharemovalduringrootcanalretreatment
AT talwarsangeeta invitroevaluationofefficacyofdifferentrotaryinstrumentsystemsforguttapercharemovalduringrootcanalretreatment